Home > 106th Congressional Bills > H.Con.Res. 309 (rfs) Expressing the sense of the Congress with regard to in-school personal safety education programs for children. [Referred in Senate] ...H.Con.Res. 309 (rfs) Expressing the sense of the Congress with regard to in-school personal safety education programs for children. [Referred in Senate] ...
108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 309
Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the improvement of combined
sewer overflow control programs.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 21, 2003
Mr. Meehan (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Castle, Mr. Langevin, Mr.
Bass, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Inslee, Ms. McCarthy
of Missouri, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Kind, and Mr.
Pallone) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the improvement of combined
sewer overflow control programs.
Whereas approximately 772 communities in the United States, concentrated in the
Northeast, Great Lakes region, and Pacific Northwest, have combined
sewer systems;
Whereas combined sewer systems are sewer systems that transport rainwater
runoff, domestic sewage, and industrial waste through a single pipe to
municipal treatment plants;
Whereas combined sewer systems were among the earliest sewer systems built in
the United States;
Whereas combined sewer overflow occurs when the capacity of the collection and
treatment system is exceeded due to high volumes of rainwater or
snowmelt;
Whereas when the capacity of a combined sewer system is exceeded, untreated
rainwater runoff, domestic sewage, and industrial waste is discharged
into surface waters;
Whereas combined sewer overflow can create serious public health and water
quality concerns;
Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency has required communities in which
combined sewer overflow is prevalent to develop long-term control plans
for combined sewer overflow;
Whereas implementation of these long-term control plans can require
extraordinarily large infrastructure investments that may be beyond the
financial means of communities in which combined sewer overflow is
prevalent;
Whereas local government and utility ratepayers are currently burdened with
paying more than 90 percent of all spending on drinking water and
wastewater infrastructure;
Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency estimated in its 2000 Clean Water
Needs Survey Report to Congress that it will cost $50,600,000,000 to
control combined sewer overflow nationwide;
Whereas experts in the wastewater treatment sector consider the Environmental
Protection Agency's figure to be a gross underestimate of required
control costs;
Whereas the Federal Government has recognized that it has an obligation to
assist communities in complying with water pollution control mandates of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
Whereas the construction grants program under that Act assisted States and
communities in modernizing their water and sewer distribution programs;
Whereas the construction grants program under that Act has been replaced by
annual Federal grants to capitalize State water pollution control
revolving loan funds;
Whereas federally capitalized State water pollution control revolving loan funds
have been increasingly used to provide below-market and zero-interest
loans to communities for projects to control combined sewer overflow;
Whereas although federally capitalized State water pollution control revolving
loan funds have assisted efforts to control combined sewer overflow,
many communities cannot afford to repay loans for 100 percent of the
cost of water infrastructure projects;
Whereas Congress has recognized that Federal grants are a necessary component of
helping communities afford combined sewer overflow control;
Whereas Congress has provided ``earmarked'' funding for infrastructure to
control combined sewer overflow for specific communities in annual
appropriations Acts, accompanied by a 45 percent local cost-share
requirement;
Whereas recognizing that ``earmarked'' funding for infrastructure to control
combined sewer overflow in annual appropriations Acts did not fully meet
the enormous needs of communites in which combined sewer overflow is
prevalent, in 2000 Congress passed amendments to the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act authorizing the Environmental Protection Agency to
provide $750,000,000 in grants in each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003 to
these communities, either directly or through States, for planning,
design, and construction of combined sewer overflow treatment;
Whereas the combined sewer overflow grant program authorized in 2000 assigns
financially distressed communities priority for direct grants;
Whereas the new combined sewer overflow grant program was not funded in either
fiscal year 2002 or 2003; and
Whereas the new combined sewer overflow grant program's authorization expires
after fiscal year 2003: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That Congress--
(1) should commit and provide substantially increased
Federal funding and resources for combined sewer overflow
control, which commitment must include a significant grant
component;
(2) should increase Federal funding for combined sewer
overflow control to levels sufficient to cover at least 80
percent of the costs of such control incurred by financially
distressed communities, particularly those located in urban
areas;
(3) should provide the Environmental Protection Agency with
additional resources to improve nationwide tracking of progress
in combined sewer overflow control programs; and
(4) should expressly authorize the Army Corps of Engineers
to assist communities with assessment and design work
associated with upgrades of combined sewer systems.
<all>
Pages: 1 Other Popular 106th Congressional Bills Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |