| Home > 104th Congressional Documents > H.Doc.104-156 EMIGRATION LAWS AND POLICIES OF ROMANIA ...
H.Doc.104-156 EMIGRATION LAWS AND POLICIES OF ROMANIA ...
104th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 104-155 VETO OF H.R. 1530 ---------- MESSAGE from THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES transmitting HIS VETO OF H.R. 1530, THE ``NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996'' <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> January 3, 1996.--Message and accompanying bill ordered to be printed VETO OF H.R. 1530, THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 104th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 104-155 VETO OF H.R. 1530 __________ MESSAGE from THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES transmitting HIS VETO OF H.R. 1530, THE ``NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996'' <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> January 3, 1996.--Message and accompanying bill ordered to be printed To the House of Representatives: I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 1530, the ``National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996.'' H.R. 1530 would unacceptably restrict my ability to carry out this country's national security objectives and substantially interfere with the implementation of key national defense programs. It would also restrict the President's authority in the conduct of foreign affairs and as Commander in Chief, raising serious constitutional concerns. First, the bill requires deployment by 2003 of a costly missile defense system able to defend all 50 States from a long-range missile threat that our Intelligence Community does not foresee in the coming decade. By forcing such an unwarranted deployment decision now, the bill would waste tens of billions of dollars and force us to commit prematurely to a specific technological option. It would also likely require a multiple-site architecture that cannot be accommodated within the terms of the existing ABM Treaty. By setting U.S. policy on a collision course with the ABM Treaty, the bill would jeopardize continued Russian implementation of the START I Treaty as well as Russian ratification of START II--two treaties that will significantly lower the threat to U.S. national security, reducing the number of U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear warheads by two-thirds from Cold War levels. The missile defense provisions would also jeopardize our current efforts to agree on an ABM/TMD (Theater Missile Defense) demarcation with the Russian Federation. Second, the bill imposes restrictions on the President's ability to conduct contingency operations essential to national security. Its restrictions on funding of contingency operations and the requirement to submit a supplemental appropriations request within a time certain in order to continue a contingency operation are unwarranted restrictions on a President's national security and foreign policy prerogatives. Moreover, by requiring a Presidential certification to assign U.S. Armed Forces under United Nations operational or tactical control, the bill infringes on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief. Third, H.R. 1530 contains other objectionable provisions that would adversely affect the ability of the Defense Department to carry out national defense programs or impede the Department's ability to manage its day-to-day operations. For example, the bill includes counterproductive certification requirements for the use of Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) funds and restricts use of funds for individual CTR programs. Other objectionable provisions eliminate funding for the Defense Enterprise Fund; restrict the retirement of U.S. strategic delivery systems; slow the pace of the Defense Department's environmental cleanup efforts; and restrict Defense's ability to execute disaster relief, demining, and military-to-military contact programs. The bill also directs the procurement of specific submarines at specific shipyards although that is not necessary for our military mission to maintain the Nation's industrial base. H.R. 1530 also contains two provisions that would unfairly affect certain service members. One requires medically unwarranted discharge procedures for HIV-positive service members. In addition, I remain very concerned about provisions that would restrict service women and female dependents of military personnel from obtaining privately funded abortions in military facilities overseas, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. In many countries, these U.S. facilities provide the only accessible, safe source for these medical services. Accordingly, I urge the Congress to repeal a similar provision that became law in the ``Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996.'' In returning H.R. 1530 to the Congress, I recognize that it contains a number of important authorities for the Department of Defense, including authority for Defense's military construction program and the improvement of housing facilities for our military personnel and their families. It also contains provisions that would contribute to the effective and efficient management of the Department, including important changes in Federal acquisition law. Finally, H.R. 1530 includes the authorization for an annual military pay raise of 2.4 percent, which I strongly support. The Congress should enact this authorization as soon as possible, in separate legislation that I will be sending up immediately. In the meantime, I will today sign an Executive order raising military pay for the full 2.0 percent currently authorized by the Congress and will sign an additional order raising pay by a further 0.4 percent as soon as the Congress authorizes that increase. I urge the Congress to address the Administration's objections and pass an acceptable National Defense Authorization Act promptly. The Department of Defense must have the full range of authorities that it needs to perform its critical worldwide missions. William J. Clinton. The White House, December 28, 1995. H.R. 1530 One Hundred Fourth Congress of the United States of America, at the First Session, Begun and Held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the Fourth Day of January, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-five An Act To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996''. SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into five divisions as follows: (1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D--Federal Acquisition Reform. (5) Division E--Information Technology Management Reform. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees defined. DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I--PROCUREMENT Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 101. Army. Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 103. Air Force. Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. Sec. 105. Reserve components. Sec. 106. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 107. Chemical demilitarization program. Sec. 108. Defense health programs. Subtitle B--Army Programs Sec. 111. Procurement of OH-58D Armed Kiowa Warrior helicopters. Sec. 112. Repeal of requirements for armored vehicle upgrades. Sec. 113. Multiyear procurement of helicopters. Sec. 114. Report on AH-64D engine upgrades. Sec. 115. Requirement for use of previously authorized multiyear procurement authority for Army small arms procurement. Subtitle C--Navy Programs Sec. 131. Nuclear attack submarines. Sec. 132. Research for advanced submarine technology. Sec. 133. Cost limitation for Seawolf submarine program. Sec. 134. Repeal of prohibition on backfit of Trident submarines. Sec. 135. Arleigh Burke class destroyer program. Sec. 136. Acquisition program for crash attenuating seats. Sec. 137. T-39N trainer aircraft. Sec. 138. Pioneer unmanned aerial vehicle program. Subtitle D--Air Force Programs Sec. 141. B-2 aircraft program. Sec. 142. Procurement of B-2 bombers. Sec. 143. MC-130H aircraft program. Subtitle E--Chemical Demilitarization Program Sec. 151. Repeal of requirement to proceed expeditiously with development of chemical demilitarization cryofracture facility at Tooele Army Depot, Utah. Sec. 152. Destruction of existing stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions. Sec. 153. Administration of chemical demilitarization program. TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 202. Amount for basic research and exploratory development. Sec. 203. Modifications to Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program. Sec. 204. Defense dual use technology initiative. Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 211. Space launch modernization. Sec. 212. Tactical manned reconnaissance. Sec. 213. Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program. Sec. 214. Development of laser program. Sec. 215. Navy mine countermeasures program. Sec. 216. Space-based infrared system. Sec. 217. Defense Nuclear Agency programs. Sec. 218. Counterproliferation support program. Sec. 219. Nonlethal weapons study. Sec. 220. Federally funded research and development centers and university- affiliated research centers. Sec. 221. Joint seismic program and global seismic network. Sec. 222. Hydra-70 rocket product improvement program. Sec. 223. Limitation on obligation of funds until receipt of electronic combat consolidation master plan. Sec. 224. Obligation of certain funds delayed until receipt of report on science and technology rescissions. Sec. 225. Obligation of certain funds delayed until receipt of report on reductions in research, development, test, and evaluation.
Other Popular 104th Congressional Documents Documents:
|GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information.|
Supreme Court Decisions
104th Congressional Documents
105th Congressional Documents
106th Congressional Documents
107th Congressional Documents
108th Congressional Documents
1994 Presidential Documents