Home > 108th Congressional Documents > H.Doc.108-34 BENCHMARKS FOR A SUSTAINABLE PEACE ...H.Doc.108-34 BENCHMARKS FOR A SUSTAINABLE PEACE ...
the KPC has been trained to conduct emergency explosive
ordinance disposal services and is primarily responsible for
UXO deactivation or destruction. The overall result of this
concentrated effort has been a drastic reduction in mine/UXO/
CBU-related casualties although lethal incidents sometimes
still occur. In light of these operating procedures, this
benchmark is essentially accomplished.
e. Elections held in secure environment
Local assemblies and governments have been established in
all of Kosovo's 30 municipalities, including most Serb-
dominated ones in the north. Kosovo municipal elections in 2000
and again in 2002 were in accordance with international
standards as were Kosovo-wide elections in 2001. Overall voter
turnout within Kosovo has been high but with a downward trend.
The absence of significant election-related violence indicates
a general stabilization of the political environment in Kosovo.
UNMIK Police, KPS, and KFOR worked together to help ensure
these first-everdemocratic provincial elections were not marred
by any significant violence. In spring 2002, the Assembly elected a
President and a Prime Minister to head Kosovo's provisional government
which will continue until new elections in 2004. This benchmark is
essentially accomplished.
f. Parallel institutions dissolved and pose no threat to KFOR and/or
UNMIK authority
The fledging Kosovo provisional government is working to
govern the province with less assistance from UNMIK, KFOR, and
the international community (IC). Programs to train government
leaders and bolster efforts at effective administration have
helped the provisional government to assume increased
responsibility and demonstrate increasing effectiveness.
However, the slow pace of legislation to date and remaining
international influence in areas not reserved to UNMIK remain
problematic. Considerably more needs to be done to ensure
effective self-government at both the Kosovo and municipal
levels and to achieve UNMIK benchmarks in the rule of law,
returns, the economy, and other areas. Particularly in North
Mitrovica, and elsewhere throughout Kosovo, UNMIK needs to
implement its plan for decentralization to ensure effective
administration and rights for Serbs and other minorities at the
sub-municipal level. At the same time, Serbian parallel
institutions primarily in the areas of health, education, and
judiciary and law enforcement, need to cease functioning to
allow UNMIK to fully establish their authority under UNSCR
1244. While this is occurring, UNMIK acknowledges the continued
need for Belgrade to supplement the salaries of health care
workers and educators as an incentive for them to remain in
Kosovo.
g. KFOR transfers criminal cases to UNMIK/Kosovo Transitional
Government for investigation, prosecution, and detention; and
sufficient civilian prisons and detention facilities are
established
UNMIK judicial officials and UNMIK CIVPOL and KPS, conduct
all criminal investigations in Kosovo. When KFOR apprehends a
suspect, he/she can be turned over to UNMIK for action under
the Special Representative's ``executive detention'' authority
pending UNMIK (or local) criminal charges being filed. Under
his own authority, the KFOR Commander can confine individuals
on the basis that they pose a threat to a safe and secure
environment. KFOR maintains detention facilities for
individuals at Camp Bondsteel. UNMIK maintains eight detention
facilities Kosovo-wide and one prison near Ishtok in northwest
Kosovo.
h. Adequate court system for criminal cases transferred to UNMIK
Since June 1999, UNMIK has established a Kosovo supreme
court, five district courts, 18 municipal courts, 23 ``minor
offenses courts,'' one ``high court of minor offenses,'' one
commercial court, and 13 prosecutor's offices. While UNMIK has
appointed more than 400 local judges and prosecutors, only 320
are currently working in those positions. Additionally, a total
of 28 international judges and prosecutors are assigned to the
district courts and the supreme court. Trials are conducted in
all five district courts, the supreme court, and lower courts.
Thus, there is an embryonic court system in place; however,
concerns continue over the ability of the criminal courts to
apply the law fairly due to the inexperience of many of the
judges and prosecutors, suspected intimidation, and the
outdated socialist criminal code still applicable in Kosovo.
Judicial training conducted by the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)-run Kosovo Judicial Institute
is beginning to address this problem. Some cases referred by
KFOR to UNMIK are difficult to prosecute due to evidentiary
problems. KFOR soldiers are not trained criminal investigators,
and often the information gathered by KFOR is classified. As a
result, some criminal cases are dismissed by UNMIK due to a
lack of prosecutable evidence. UNMIK and KFOR are working
together to resolve these issues and UNMIK has made many
notable arrests and convictions in 2002. Adequate witness
protection is a problem as well.
i. Core KPS police training is completed and effective
The OSCE administers the Kosovo Police Service School,
which has graduated over 5,200 Kosovar police trainees.
Graduate trainees go on to complete field training and assume
independent patrol responsibilities (with UNMIK police
oversight). The operational control of two police stations has
been turned over to the KPS. Advanced training phases are being
conducted at the KPS School to create specialized capacities,
including training supervisors, criminal investigators,
forensics specialists,traffic officers, and close protection
specialists. The United States is initiating further specialized
training in areas such as civil disorder management and advanced
criminal investigations. Anti-Serb violence has shown an overall
downward trend, although serious periodic incidents continue to mar
progress and freedom of movement remains problematic without KFOR
escort. UNMIK police and KPS have assumed full responsibility in
Pristina, Prizren, Gniljane, and Peja regions and share responsibility
with KFOR in Mitrovica. This benchmark is essentially accomplished
although the KPS requires further expansion, experience, and training.
j. UNMIK and KPS assume primacy for tactical police responsibilities;
and, UNMIK Special Police Unit and KPS are capable to respond
to civil disturbances
UNMIK Police, working with KPS, has assumed full primacy in
Pristine, Prizren, Gjilan, and Peja regions; and shares primacy
with KFOR in Mitrovica, where they have begun to assert more
authority to address the remaining challenge from members of
violent ``bridge gangs.'' UNMIK generally has been able to
handle civil disturbances through the use of its Special Police
Units (SPUs) that react to any civil disturbances throughout
Kosovo. KPS has assumed primary responsibility for patrol
functions. As part of two agreements with KFOR, UNMIK police
have taken on greater responsibility for border functions and
the roving patrols of patrimonial sites, and other
infrastructure sites.
k. Some displaced persons and refugees able to return home safely
Displaced Kosovo Albanians began returning to their homes
in June 1999, concomitant with the entry of NATO forces into
Kosovo. To date, over one million people have returned and
begun rebuilding their lives. By contrast, significant
difficulties remain in the area of minority returns. More than
200,000 Serbs, Roma, and other minorities remain displaced
outside of Kosovo, most in Serbia. While modest progress has
been made to date, and in 2002 returns outpaced departures for
the first time, UNMIK anticipates that there will be a
significant increase in IC-facilitated returns beginning in
spring 2003. Continued KFOR cooperation with UNHCR and UNMIK
will play a key part in making these returns safe and
sustainable. Freedom of movement remains a problem for many
Serbs and Roma who remain in Kosovo, most of whom live in
difficult circumstances in isolated enclaves. Most require KFOR
escort each time they venture out to ensure their safety;
however, for others freedom of movement has improved
significantly and KFOR has removed a number of fixed
checkpoints, particularly in the MNB-E area.
3. Task: Border and boundary issues
Objectives:
<bullet> Monitor international and provincial boundaries.
<bullet> Inhibit traffic of persons or materials supporting
insurgency and illegal goods.
<bullet> Transfer border responsibilities to local
authorities.
Benchmarks:
a. The FRY respects the GSZ and ASZ as stipulated in the MTA and at the
discretion of the KFOR commander
The GSZ and ASZ, 5- and 25-kilometer ``buffer zones''
respectively around Kosovo, were established to prevent
boundary incidents or reentry into Kosovo by FRY security
forces. The FRY has respected the zones from their inception.
Following the change of government in Yugoslavia and a
concomitant improvement in the relationship with NATO and KFOR,
FRY security forces were allowed to reenter the GSZ in the
spring of 2001. Reentry was conducted successfully and in a
professional manner. Similarly, the ASZ was reduced to 10-
kilometers and in Fall 2002 to 5-kilometers. This benchmark is
essentially accomplished.
b. Illegal border crossings inhibited; and UNMIK or indigenous border
service in place to monitor provincial and international border
crossings
Kosovo's boundaries are generally unmarked and in many
areas lie in rough, mountainous terrain. Attempts to demarcate
the Kosovo-Macedonia border under the 2001 FRY-Macedonia Border
Treaty in the near future could be particularly problematic as
inhabitants traditionally have crisscrossed the borders freely.
UNMIK established five official border crossing points,
including the Pristina airport, where UNMIK police control
immigration and collecttariffs. KFOR actively supports UNMIK in
this role, regularly patrolling borders and employing monitoring
technology. Also, a border-crossing section of the KPS has been
established. Net assessment of combined efforts is that illegal border
crossings have been significantly reduced, although much remains to be
done. The installation at the airport and border points of entry of a
positive identification and tracking system remains a high priority.
4. Task: War crimes
Objective:
<bullet> Full cooperation of the international security
presence with the ICTY.
The objective of this benchmark is of an ongoing nature for
the IC, continuing until the work of the ICTY is completed.
ICTY chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte has said publicly on
several occasions that there will be indictments of senior
former KLA figures in Kosovo. UNMIK is investigating possible
prosecutions as well, and at the end of 2002 an UNMIK court
consisting of three international judges convicted and
sentenced five former KLA figures for war crimes against other
Kosovar Albanians.
Benchmark:
a. KFOR assists and supports ICTY
KFOR actively supports the collection of evidence by ICTY,
and provides area security for exhumations. The United States
deployed two FBI forensic investigative teams to Kosovo at a
cost of $5 million, and provided an additional $8.5 million for
ICTY investigative costs associated with Kosovo war crimes. In
November 2002, SACEUR noted that NATO remains committed to
supporting efforts to bring persons indicted for war crimes to
justice and has stated that the physical presence of NATO in
the Balkans is continuing to help deter hostilities. Should the
ICTY issue indictments for Kosovars, KFOR will be called upon
to help manage large and possible violent demonstrations that
will almost certainly result, and might need to assist in the
apprehension and transfer of indicted individuals.
<greek-d>
Other Popular 108th Congressional Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |