Home > 106th Congressional Bills > H.R. 170 (eh) To require certain notices in any mailing using a game of chance for the promotion of a product or service, and for other purposes. [Engrossed in House] ...H.R. 170 (eh) To require certain notices in any mailing using a game of chance for the promotion of a product or service, and for other purposes. [Engrossed in House] ...
108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1709
To restore standards to protect the privacy of individually
identifiable health information that were weakened by the August 2002
modifications, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 10, 2003
Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Waxman, and Mr. Dingell)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and
Means, and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To restore standards to protect the privacy of individually
identifiable health information that were weakened by the August 2002
modifications, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Taking Our Health Privacy
(STOHP) Act of 2003''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds as follows:
(1) People in the United States are deeply concerned about
the confidentiality of their health information. According to a
survey conducted by the Princeton Survey Research Associates, 1
in 6 people in the United States has done something out of the
ordinary to keep personal health information confidential,
including withholding information, providing inaccurate
information, or, in some cases, avoiding care entirely.
(2) Pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, commonly referred to as ``HIPAA''
(Public Law 104-191; 110 Stat. 1936 et seq.), the Department of
Health and Human Services issued comprehensive medical privacy
regulations, which were promulgated in final form in December
2000.
(3) These regulations established a sound foundation of
privacy protections by prohibiting the use or disclosure of an
individual's health information unless specifically authorized
by the regulations or by the individual. The regulations also
required health care providers such as physicians and health
clinics, health plans, and health care clearinghouses, which
are responsible for handling transactions such as billing
between health plans and providers, to notify individuals about
privacy practices regarding disclosure of health information.
The regulations also provided individuals with the right to
access and copy their own health records, and the right to
request corrections of their health records, among other
provisions.
(4) The regulations took effect on April 14, 2000, and
required health care providers, health plans (other than small
health plans), and health care clearinghouses to comply not
later than April 14, 2003.
(5) On August 14, 2002, the Department of Health and Human
Services issued modifications to the December 2000 medical
privacy rule that significantly weakened privacy protections.
(6) These modifications eliminated the requirement that
health care providers, health plans, and health care
clearinghouses obtain patient consent before using or
disclosing patient health information for treatment, payment,
or health care operations. This change means that patients'
medical information can be used or disclosed without their
permission for a wide range of purposes, including business
activities that have nothing to do with patient care, such as
the sale or merger of a health maintenance organization (HMO).
This change also permits the use and disclosure of information
in existing medical records even though patients disclosed the
information with the understanding and expectation that it
would not be used or disclosed without their consent. The
elimination of consent compromises the confidentiality that is
the heart of physician-patient relationships and is
indispensable for the delivery of high-quality health care.
(7) The August 2002 modifications also undermined medical
privacy protections by expanding the circumstances under which
patients' information can be shared without their knowledge or
consent to include activities that consumers typically consider
marketing. This change permits pharmacies and other providers
to use consumers' medical information without their permission
to mail them unsolicited drug product recommendations.
Furthermore, providers are not required to disclose fees paid
to them by drug companies for sending such communications nor
provide consumers with the choice to opt out of such future
communications.
(8) The August 2002 modifications further undermined
medical privacy protections by changing the section of the rule
governing public health. The change allows providers to
disclose medical information without patient permission to
entities regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, such as
pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers, for
a broad range of purposes including marketing campaigns. In
contrast, the December 2000 rule allowed nonconsensual
disclosure of patient health information for a limited list of
public health-related activities, such as reporting serious
side effects from a prescription drug to the Food and Drug
Administration.
(9) Reversal of the August 2002 modifications to the
medical privacy rule is integral to any effort to ensure
privacy protections for consumers' personal health information
and preserve access to high-quality health care in the United
States.
(10) Congress should restore core medical privacy
protections of the December 2000 medical privacy rule by--
(A) reinstating the patient consent requirement for
treatment, payment, and health care operations, while
ensuring that the requirement does not impede important
health care activities such as filling pharmaceutical
prescriptions and making physician referrals;
(B) returning to the December 2000 definition of
``marketing'' and thus ensuring that activities
typically considered ``marketing,'' such as drug
companies paying pharmacies to send product
recommendations to patients, fall under the rule's
privacy protections governing marketing activities; and
(C) eliminating the broad ``public health''
loophole created by the August 2002 rule.
SEC. 3. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Act is to restore patient privacy protections
essential for high-quality health care that were undermined by the
August 2002 modifications of the December 2000 medical privacy rule.
SEC. 4. RESTORATION OF PRIVACY PROTECTIONS.
(a) Consent for Uses or Disclosures to Carry Out Treatment,
Payment, or Health Care Operations.--
(1) In general.--The modifications made to section 164.506
of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, by the August 2002
medical privacy rule shall have no force or effect.
(2) Clarification regarding instances when consent is not
required.-- In addition to the circumstances described in the
December 2000 medical privacy rule, and notwithstanding any
provision to the contrary, such section 164.506 shall be
construed and applied so as to permit a health care provider to
use or disclose an individual's protected health information
without obtaining the prior consent of the individual in the
following circumstances:
(A) A health care provider may use or disclose an
individual's protected health information to fill or
dispense a prescription, search for drug interactions
related to that prescription, and determine eligibility
and obtain authorization for payment regarding that
prescription, if the health care provider obtains
written consent from the individual as soon as
practicable.
(B) A health care provider may use or disclose an
individual's protected health information to carry out
treatment of that individual if--
(i) the individual and the health care
provider have not had in-person communication
regarding such treatment;
(ii) obtaining consent would be
impracticable;
(iii) the health care provider determines,
in the exercise of professional judgment, that
the individual's consent is clearly inferred
from the circumstances, such as an order or
referral from another health care provider; and
(iv) the health care provider obtains
written consent from the individual as soon as
practicable.
(b) Marketing.--
(1) In general.--The modifications made by the August 2002
medical privacy rule to the definition of the term
``marketing'' in section 164.501 of title 45, Code of Federal
Regulations, shall have no force or effect.
(2) Treatment of certain communications.--The exception for
oral communications in paragraph (2)(i) of the definition of
the term ``marketing'' in section 164.501 of title 45, Code of
Federal Regulations, as contained in the December 2000 medical
privacy rule, shall have no force or effect.
(3) Authorizations for marketing.--Section 164.508 of title
45, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be construed and applied
so as to require that, if an authorization is required for a
use or disclosure for marketing, the authorization shall be
considered invalid unless it--
(A) uses the term ``marketing'';
(B) states that the purpose of the use or
disclosure involved is marketing;
(C) describes the specific marketing uses and
disclosures authorized, including whether the protected
health information involved--
(i) may be used for purposes internal to
the covered entity;
(ii) may be disclosed to, and used by, a
business associate of the covered entity; and
(iii) may be disclosed to, and used by, any
person or entity other than a business
associate of the covered entity; and
(D) states that the use or disclosure of protected
health information for marketing will directly result
in remuneration to the covered entity from a third
party, in any case in which a covered entity expects,
or reasonably should expect, that such remuneration
will occur.
(c) Public Health.--The modifications made to section
164.512(b)(1)(iii) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, by the
August 2002 medical privacy rule shall have no force or effect.
SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS; EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) In General.--For purposes of this Act:
(1) December 2000 medical privacy rule.--The term
``December 2000 medical privacy rule'' means the final rule on
standards for privacy of individually identifiable health
information published on December 28, 2000, in the Federal
Register (65 Fed. Reg. 82462), including the provisions of
title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, revised or added by such
rule.
(2) August 2002 medical privacy rule.--The term ``August
2002 medical privacy rule'' means the final rule, published on
August 14, 2002, in the Federal Register (67 Fed. Reg. 53182),
that modified the December 2000 medical privacy rule.
(b) Other Terms Defined.--For purposes of this Act:
(1) Business associate; covered entity; health care
provider.--The terms ``business associate'', ``covered
entity'', and ``health care provider'' shall have the meaning
given such terms in section 160.103 of title 45, Code of
Federal Regulations, as contained in the December 2000 medical
privacy rule.
(2) Disclosure; individual, protected health information;
treatment; use.--The terms ``disclosure'', ``individual'',
``protected health information'', ``treatment'', and ``use''
shall have the meaning given such terms in section 164.501 of
title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, as contained in the
December 2000 medical privacy rule.
(c) Effective Date; No Regulations Required.--This Act shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and does not require
the issuance of regulations.
<all>
Pages: 1 Other Popular 106th Congressional Bills Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |