| Home > 106th Congressional Bills > H.R. 2084 (eh) Making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. [Engrossed in House] ...
H.R. 2084 (eh) Making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. [Engrossed in House] ...
California San Joaquin buses and bus facilities, Stockton, California San Juan Intermodal access, Puerto Rico San Marcos Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) intermodal project, Texas Sandy buses, Oregon Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit district bus facilities, California Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority buses and bus facilities, California Santa Clarita buses, California Santa Cruz metropolitan bus facilities, California Santa Fe CNG buses, New Mexico Santa Fe paratransit/computer systems, New Mexico Santa Marie organization of transportation helpers minibuses, California Savannah/Chatham Area transit bus transfer centers and buses, Georgia Seattle Sound Transit buses and bus facilities, Washington Seattle, intermodal transportation terminal, Washington SMART buses and bus facilities, Michigan Snohomish County, Community Transit buses, equipment and facilities, Washington Solano Links intercity transit OTR bus purchase, California Somerset County bus facilities and buses, Pennsylvania South Amboy, Regional Intermodal Transportation Initiative, New Jersey South Bend, Urban Intermodal Transportation Facility, Indiana South Carolina statewide bus and bus facility. South Carolina Virtual Transit Enterprise, South Carolina South Dakota statewide bus facilities and buses, South Dakota South Metro Area Rapid Transit (SMART) maintenance facility, Oregon Southeast Missouri transportation service rural, elderly, disabled service, Missouri Springfield Metro/VRE pedestrian link, Virginia Springfield, Union Station, Massachusetts St. Joseph buses and vans, Missouri St. Louis, Bi-state Intermodal Center, Missouri St. Louis Bi-state Metro Link buses Sunset Empire Transit District intermodal transit facility, Oregon Syracuse CNG buses and facilities, New York Tacoma Dome, buses and bus facilities, Washington Tennessee statewide buses and bus facilities, Tennessee Texas statewide small urban and rural buses, Texas Topeka Transit offstreet transit transfer center, Kansas Towamencin Township, Intermodal Bus Transportation Center, Pennsylvania Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) buses, Kentucky Tucson buses, Arizona Twin Cities area metro transit buses and bus facilities, Minnesota Utah Transit Authority buses, Utah Utah Transit Authority, intermodal facilities, Utah Utah Transit Authority/Park City Transit, buses, Utah Utica Union Station, New York Valley bus and bus facilities, Alabama Vancouver Clark County (SEATRAN) bus facilities, Washington Washington County intermodal facilities, Pennsylvania Washington State DOT combined small transit system buses and bus facilities, Washington Washington, D.C. Intermodal Transportation Center, District/Columbia Washoe County transit improvements, Nevada Waterbury, bus facility, Connecticut West Falls Church Metro station improvements, Virginia West Lafayette bus transfer station/terminal (Wabash Landing), Indiana West Virginia Statewide Intermodal Facility and buses, West Virginia Westchester County DOT, articulated buses, New York Westchester County, Bee-Line transit system fareboxes, New York Westchester County, Bee-Line transit system shuttle buses, New York Westminster senior citizen vans, California Westmoreland County, Intermodal Facility, Pennsylvania Whittier intermodal facility and pedestrian overpass, Alaska Wilkes-Barre, Intermodal Facility, Pennsylvania Williamsport bus facility, Pennsylvania Wisconsin statewide bus facilities and buses, Wisconsin Worcester, Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Massachusetts Yuma paratransit buses, Arizona: Provided further, That within the total funds provided for new fixed guideway systems to carry out 49 U.S.C. section 5309, the following projects shall be considered eligible for these funds: Provided further, That the Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration shall, not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act, individually submit to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations the recommended grant funding levels for the respective projects. The following new fixed guideway systems and extensions to existing systems are eligible to receive funding for final design and construction: Alaska or Hawaii ferries; Albuquerque/Greater Albuquerque mass transit project; Atlanta North Line Extension; Austin Capital Metro Northwest/North Central Corridor project; Baltimore Central Light Rail double tracking project; Boston North-South Rail Link; Boston Piers Transitway phase 1; Charlotte North-South corridor transitway project; Chicago Metra commuter rail extensions; Chicago Transit Authority Ravenswood and Douglas branch line projects; Cleveland Euclid Corridor; Dallas Area Rapid Transit North Central LRT extension; Dane County/Madison East-West Corridor; Denver Southeast Corridor project; Denver Southwest LRT project; Fort Lauderdale Tri-Rail commuter rail project; Galveston rail trolley extension project; Houston Regional Bus Plan; Lahaina Harbor, Maui ferries; Las Vegas Corridor/Clark County regional fixed guideway project; Little Rock River Rail project; Long Island Rail Road East Side Access project; Los Angeles Metro Rail--MOS 3 and Eastside/Mid City corridors; MARC expansion programs: Silver Spring intermodal center and Penn-Camden rail connection; Memphis Area Transit Authority medical center extension; Miami East-West Corridor project; Miami North 27th Avenue corridor; New Orleans Airport-CBD commuter rail project; New Orleans Canal Streetcar Spine; New Orleans Desire Streetcar; Newark-Elizabeth rail link project; Norfolk-Virginia Beach Corridor project; Northern Indiana South Shore commuter rail project; Northern New Jersey--Hudson-Bergen LRT project; Orange County Transitway project; Orlando I-4 Central Florida LRT project; Philadelphia Schuykill Valley Metro; Phoenix--Central Phoenix/East Valley Corridor; Pittsburgh Airborne Shuttle System; Pittsburgh North Shore--Central Business District corridor; Pittsburgh State II light rail project; Port McKenzie-Ship Creek, AK ferry project; Portland Westside-Hillsboro Corridor project; Providence-Boston commuter rail; Raleigh-Durham--Research Triangle regional rail; Sacramento South Corridor LRT project; Salt Lake City South LRT Olympics capacity improvements; Salt Lake City South LRT project; Salt Lake City/Airport to University (West-East) light rail project; Salt Lake City-Ogden-Provo commuter rail project; San Bernardino MetroLink extension project; San Diego Mid Coast Corridor; San Diego Mission Valley East LRT extension project; San Diego Oceanside-Escondido passenger rail project; San Francisco BART to Airport extension; San Jose Tasman LRT project; San Juan--Tren Urbano; Seattle Sound Move Link LRT project; Spokane South Valley Corridor light rail project; St. Louis--St. Clair County, Illinois LRT project; Tacoma-Seattle Sounder commuter rail project; Tampa Bay regional rail system; Twin Cities Transitways Corridors projects; and the Washington Metro Blue Line extension--Addison Road. The following new fixed guideway systems and extensions to existing systems are eligible to receive funding for alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering: Atlanta--Lindbergh Station to MARTA West Line feasibility study; Atlanta MARTA South DeKalb comprehensive transit program; Baltimore Central Downtown MIS; Bergen County, NJ/Cross County light rail project; Birmingham, Alabama transit corridor; Boston North Shore Corridor and Blue Line extension to Beverly; Boston Urban Ring project; Bridgeport Intermodal Corridor project, Connecticut; Calais, ME Branch Rail Line regional transit program; Charleston, SC Monobeam corridor project; Cincinnati Northeast/Northern Kentucky rail line project; Colorado--Roaring Fork Valley Rail; Detroit--commuter rail to Detroit metropolitan airport feasibility study; El Paso--Juarez international fixed guideway; Girdwood, Alaska commuter rail project; Harrisburg-Lancaster Capitol Area Transit Corridor 1 commuter rail; Houston Advanced Transit Program; Indianapolis Northeast Downtown Corridor project; Jacksonville fixed guideway corridor; Johnson County, Kansas I-35 commuter rail project; Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee rail extension project; Knoxville to Memphis commuter rail feasibility study; Miami Metrorail Palmetto extension; Montpelier-St. Albans, VT commuter rail study; Nashua, NY-Lowell, MA commuter rail project; New Jersey Trans-Hudson midtown corridor study; New London waterfront access project; New York Second Avenue Subway feasibility study; Old Saybrook--Hartford Rail Extension; Philadelphia SEPTA commuter rail, R-3 connection--Elwyn to Wawa; Philadelphia SEPTA Cross County Metro; Salt Lake City light rail extensions; Santa Fe/El Dorado rail link; Stamford fixed guideway connector; Stockton Altamont Commuter Rail; Virginia Railway Express Woodbridge transit access station improvements project; Washington, D.C. Dulles Corridor extension project; Western Montana regional transportation/commuter rail study; Wilmington, DE downtown transit connector; and the Wilsonville to Washington County, OR connection to Westside. Discretionary Grants (liquidation of contract authorization) (highway trust fund, mass transit account) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for payment of previous obligations incurred in carrying out 49 U.S.C. 5338(b), $1,500,000,000, to remain available until expended and to be derived from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund. Job Access and Reverse Commute Grants For necessary expenses to carry out section 3037 of the Federal Transit Act of 1998, $15,000,000, to remain available until expended: Provided, That no more than $75,000,000 of budget authority shall be available for these purposes. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation is hereby authorized to make such expenditures, within the limits of funds and borrowing authority available to the Corporation, and in accord with law, and to make such contracts and commitments without regard to fiscal year limitations as provided by section 104 of the Government Corporation Control Act, as amended, as may be necessary in carrying out the programs set forth in the Corporation's budget for the current fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance (harbor maintenance trust fund) For necessary expenses for operations and maintenance of those portions of the Saint Lawrence Seaway operated and maintained by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, $11,496,000, to be derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, pursuant to Public Law 99-662. RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION Research and Special Programs For expenses necessary to discharge the functions of the Research and Special Programs Administration, $30,752,000, of which $575,000 shall be derived from the Pipeline Safety Fund, and of which $3,500,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2002: Provided, That up to $1,200,000 in fees collected under 49 U.S.C. 5108(g) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury as offsetting receipts: Provided further, That there may be credited to this appropriation, to be available until expended, funds received from States, counties, municipalities, other public authorities, and private sources for expenses incurred for training, for reports publication and dissemination, and for travel expenses incurred in performance of hazardous materials exemptions and approvals functions. Pipeline Safety (pipeline safety fund) (oil spill liability trust fund) For expenses necessary to conduct the functions of the pipeline safety program, for grants-in-aid to carry out a pipeline safety program, as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 60107, and to discharge the pipeline program responsibilities of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, $36,104,000, of which $4,704,000 shall be derived from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund and shall remain available until September 30, 2002; and of which $30,000,000 shall be derived from the Pipeline Safety Fund, of which $16,500,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2001: Provided, That in addition to amounts made available for the Pipeline Safety Fund, $1,400,000 shall be available for grants to States for the development and establishment of one-call notification systems and public education activities, and shall be derived from amounts previously collected under 49 U.S.C. 60301.
Other Popular 106th Congressional Bills Documents:
|GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information.|
Supreme Court Decisions
104th Congressional Documents
105th Congressional Documents
106th Congressional Documents
107th Congressional Documents
108th Congressional Documents
1994 Presidential Documents