Home > 106th Congressional Bills > H.Res. 59 (ih) Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States remains committed to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). [Introduced in House] ...H.Res. 59 (ih) Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States remains committed to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). [Introduced in House] ...
H. Res. 59
In the House of Representatives, U.S.,
November 2, 1999.
Whereas for 50 years the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (hereafter in this
preamble referred to as ``NATO'') has served as the preeminent
organization to defend the territories of its member states against all
external threats;
Whereas NATO, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and
the rule of law, has proved an indispensable instrument for forging a
trans-Atlantic community of nations working together to safeguard the
freedom and common heritage of its peoples, and promoting stability in
the North Atlantic area;
Whereas NATO has acted to address new risks emerging from outside the treaty
area in the interests of preserving peace and security in the Euro-
Atlantic area, and maintains a unique collective capability to address
these new challenges which may affect Allied interests and values;
Whereas such challenges to NATO Allied interests and values include the
potential for the re-emergence of a hegemonic power confronting Europe;
rogue states and non-state actors possessing nuclear, biological, or
chemical weapons and their means of delivery; transnational terrorism
and disruption of the flow of vital resources; and conflicts outside the
treaty area stemming from unresolved historical disputes and the actions
of undemocratic governments and sub-state actors who reject the peaceful
settlement of disputes;
Whereas the security of NATO member states is inseparably linked to that of the
whole of Europe, and the consolidation and strengthening of democratic
and free societies on the entire continent, in accordance with the
principles and commitments of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe, is of direct and material concern to the NATO
Alliance and its partners;
Whereas the 50th anniversary NATO summit meeting, held on April 24-25, 1999, in
Washington, D.C., provided an historic opportunity to chart a course for
NATO in the next millennium;
Whereas NATO enhances the security of the United States by providing an
integrated military structure and a framework for consultations on
political and security concerns of any member state;
Whereas NATO remains the embodiment of United States engagement in Europe and
therefore membership in NATO remains a vital national security interest
of the United States;
Whereas the European members of NATO are today developing within the Alliance a
European Security and Defense Identity (ESDI) in order to enhance their
role within the Alliance, while at the same time the European Union (EU)
is seeking to forge among its members a Common Foreign and Security
Policy (CFSP);
Whereas the Berlin decisions of 1996 provided the framework for strengthening
the European pillar in NATO;
Whereas NATO should remain the core security organization of the evolving Euro-
Atlantic architecture in which all states enjoy the same freedom,
cooperation, and security;
Whereas NATO has embarked upon an historic mission to share its benefits and
patterns of consultation and cooperation with other nations in the Euro-
Atlantic area through both enlargement and active partnership;
Whereas the membership of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland has
strengthened NATO's ability to perform the full range of NATO missions
and bolstered its capability to integrate former communist adversary
nations into a community of democracies;
Whereas the organization of NATO national parliamentarians, the NATO
Parliamentary Assembly, serves as a unique transatlantic forum for
generating and maintaining legislative and public support for the
Alliance, and has played a key role in initiating constructive dialogue
between NATO parliamentarians and parliamentarians in Central and
Eastern Europe; and
Whereas NATO Parliamentary Assembly activities, such as the Rose-Roth program to
engage and educate Central and Eastern European parliamentarians, have
played a pioneering role in familiarizing the new democracies with
democratic institutions and a civil society: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (hereafter in
this resolution referred to as ``NATO'') is to be commended for
its pivotal role in preserving trans-Atlantic peace and
stability;
(2) the new NATO strategic concept, adopted by the Allies
at the summit meeting held in Washington, D.C. in April of
1999, articulates a concrete vision for the Alliance in the
21st century, clearly setting out the continued importance of
NATO for the citizens of the Allied nations, and establishing
that defense of shared interests and values is as important for
peace and stability as maintaining a vigorous capability to
carry out collective defense;
(3) the Alliance, while maintaining collective defense as
its core function, should, as a fundamental Alliance task,
identify crisis management operations outside the NATO treaty
area, based on case-by-case consensual Alliance decisions;
(4) the Alliance must recognize and act upon the threat
posed by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
terrorism by intensifying consultations among political and
military leaders, and deploying comprehensive capabilities to
counter these threats to the international community at the
earliest possible date;
(5) the Alliance should make clear commitments to remedy
shortfalls in areas such as logistics, command, control,
communications, intelligence, ground surveillance, readiness,
deployability, mobility, sustainability, survivability,
armaments cooperation, and effective engagement, including
early progress in the NATO force structure review;
(6) the Alliance must ensure equitable sharing of
contributions to the NATO common budgets and overall defense
expenditure and capability-building;
(7) the Alliance should welcome efforts by members of the
European Union (EU) to strengthen their military capabilities
and enhance their role within the Alliance through the European
Security and Defense Identity (ESDI);
(8) the key to a vibrant and more influential ESDI is the
improvement of European military capabilities that will
strengthen the Alliance;
(9) in order to preserve the solidarity and effectiveness
that has been achieved within the Alliance over the last 50
years, it is essential that security arrangements elaborated
under the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)
complement, rather than duplicate NATO efforts and
institutions, and be linked to, rather than decoupled from NATO
structures, and provide for full and active involvement of all
European Allies rather than discriminating against European
Allies that are not members of the EU;
(10) the Alliance should remain prepared to extend
invitations for accession negotiations to any appropriate
European democracy meeting the criteria for NATO membership as
established in the Alliance's 1995 Study on NATO Enlargement
and section 203(d)(3)(A) of the NATO Participation Act of 1994
(22 U.S.C. 1928 note), on the same conditions as applied to the
Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland;
(11) while maintaining its unchallenged right to make its
own decisions, NATO should seek to strengthen its relations
with Russia and Ukraine as essential partners in building long-
term peace in the Euro-Atlantic area; and
(12) the Alliance should fully support the NATO
Parliamentary Assembly's activities in enhancing and
stabilizing parliamentary democracy in the nations of Central
and Eastern Europe, ensuring ratification of appropriate new
NATO members, continuing to deepen cooperation within the
Alliance, and forging democratic links with the new European
democracies.
Attest:
Clerk.
Pages: 1 Other Popular 106th Congressional Bills Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |