Home > 2003 Presidential Documents > pd05my03 The President's Radio Address...pd05my03 The President's Radio Address...
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page i]
Monday, May 5, 2003
[[Page i]]
Weekly Compilation of
Presidential
Documents
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page i-iii]
Pages 491-529
Contents
[[Page ii]]
Addresses to the Nation
Iraq--516
Addresses and Remarks
See also Bill Signings; Meetings With Foreign Leaders
California, remarks to employees of United Defense Industries in
Santa Clara--518
Global HIV/AIDS Initiative--497
Michigan, Operation Iraqi Freedom in Dearborn--493
National Day of Prayer--513
National Teacher of the Year--500
Radio address--493
Bill Signings
Clean Diamond Trade Act, statement--491
Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to
end the Exploitation of Children Today
Act of 2003
Remarks--502
Statement--504
Communications to Congress
Budget amendments, letter transmitting--516
Constitution and Convention of the International Telecommunication
Union, message transmitting amendments--509
International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of
Customs Procedures, message transmitting Protocol of Amendment--
510
Communications to Federal Agencies
Wire Hanger Imports From the People's Republic of China,
memorandum--492
Interviews With the News Media
Exchanges with reporters
Oval Office--504
U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln--514
Meetings With Foreign Leaders
Colombia, President Uribe--504
(Continued on the inside of the back cover.)
Editor's Note: The President was at the Bush Ranch in Crawford, TX, on
May 2, the closing date of this issue. Releases and announcements issued
by the Office of the Press Secretary but not received in time for
inclusion in this issue will be printed next week.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF
------------------------------
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Register, National
Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, the Weekly
Compilation of Presidential Documents contains statements, messages, and
other Presidential materials released by the White House during the
preceding week.
The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is published pursuant to
the authority contained in the Federal Register Act (49 Stat. 500, as
amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the
President (37 FR 23607; 1 CFR Part 10).
Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of
Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers
for $80.00 per year ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign
subscribers for $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of
Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The charge
for a single copy is $3.00 ($3.75 for foreign mailing).
The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is also available on the Internet on the GPO Access service at http://www.gpo.gov/nara/nara003.html.
There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in
the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents.
[[Page iii]]
Contents--Continued
Proclamations
Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month--510
Law Day, U.S.A.--512
Loyalty Day--507
National Day of Prayer--508
Older Americans Month--511
Statements by the President
See also Bill Signings
AIDS relief legislation--515
Death of Edward Gaylord--497
Roadmap for peace in the Middle East--506
Statements by the President--Continued
Senate action on judicial nominations
Confirmation of Jeffrey S. Sutton as a Judge on the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit--499
Filibuster on the nomination of Priscilla Owen to be a Judge on
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit--515
Supplementary Materials
Acts approved by the President--529
Checklist of White House press releases--528
Digest of other White House announcements--524
Nominations submitted to the Senate--526
[[Page 491]]
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 491]
Pages 491-529
Week Ending Friday, May 2, 2003
Statement on Signing the Clean Diamond Trade Act
April 25, 2003
I have today signed into law H.R. 1584, the ``Clean Diamond Trade
Act.'' The Act enables this Nation to implement procedures developed by
more than 50 countries to exclude rough ``conflict diamonds'' from
international trade, while promoting legitimate trade. Conflict diamonds
have been used by rebel groups in Africa to finance their atrocities
committed on civilian populations and their insurrections against
internationally recognized governments. The United States has played a
key role over the past 2 years in forging an international consensus to
curb such damaging trade and has therefore strongly supported the
``Kimberley Process.'' Diamonds also are critical to the economic growth
and development of African and other countries, so preserving their
legitimate trade is an important foreign policy objective.
This Act directs the President to implement regulations to carry out
the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS). Although under this
Act I have discretion to issue regulations consistent with future
changes to the KPCS, under the Constitution, the President cannot be
bound to accept or follow changes that might be made to the KPCS at some
future date absent subsequent legislation. I will construe this Act
accordingly.
Section 15 of the Act provides that the legislation takes effect on
the date the President certifies to the Congress that either of two
specified events has occurred. The first event is that ``an applicable
waiver that has been granted by the World Trade Organization is in
effect.'' The second event is that ``an applicable decision in a
resolution adopted by the United Nations Security Council pursuant to
Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations is in effect.'' Once
the Act takes effect, it ``shall thereafter remain in effect during
those periods in which, as certified by the President to the Congress,
an applicable waiver or decision'' by the World Trade Organization or
the United Nations Security Council, respectively, ``is in effect.''
If section 15 imposed a mandatory duty on the President to certify
to the Congress whether either of the two specified events has occurred
and whether either remains in effect, a serious question would exist as
to whether section 15 unconstitutionally delegated legislative power to
international bodies. In order to avoid this constitutional question, I
will construe the certification process set forth in section 15 as
conferring broad discretion on the President. Specifically, I will
construe section 15 as giving the President broad discretion whether to
certify to the Congress that an applicable waiver or decision is in
effect. Similarly, I will construe section 15 as imposing no obligation
on the President to withdraw an existing certification in response to
any particular event. Rather, I will construe section 15 as giving the
President the discretion to determine when a certification that an
applicable waiver or decision is no longer in effect is warranted.
George W. Bush
The White House,
April 25, 2003.
Note: H.R. 1584, approved April 25, was assigned Public Law No. 108-19.
This item was not received in time for publication in the appropriate
issue.
[[Page 492]]
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 492-493]
Pages 491-529
Week Ending Friday, May 2, 2003
Memorandum on Wire Hanger Imports From the People's Republic of China
April 25, 2003
Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Labor, the
United States Trade Representative
Subject: Presidential Determination on Wire Hanger Imports from the
People's Republic of China
Pursuant to section 421 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2451), I have determined the action I will take with respect to
the affirmative determination of the United States International Trade
Commission (USITC Investigation TA-421-2) regarding imports of certain
steel wire garment hangers from China. After considering all relevant
aspects of the investigation, I have determined that providing import
relief for the U.S. wire hanger industry is not in the national economic
interest of the United States. In particular, I find that import relief
would have an adverse impact on the United States economy clearly
greater than the benefits of such action.
The facts of this case indicate that imposing additional tariffs on
Chinese imports would affect domestic producers unevenly, favoring one
business strategy over another. While most of the producers would likely
realize some income benefits, additional tariffs would disrupt the long-
term adjustment strategy of one major producer, which is based in part
on distribution of imported hangers, and cause that producer to incur
substantial costs.
In addition, most domestic producers, including the petitioners,
have begun to pursue adjustment strategies. While these strategies have
included consolidation, modernization of production facilities, and
expansion into complementary products and services, domestic producers
are also expanding their use of imports. Indeed, a substantial part of
the surge in imports during the most recent period measured was brought
in by domestic producers themselves, including the petitioners.
Moreover, after 6 years of competing with Chinese imports, domestic
producers still account for over 85 percent of the U.S. wire hanger
market. With this dominant share of the market, domestic producers have
the opportunity to adjust to competition from Chinese imports even
without import relief.
Furthermore, there is a strong possibility that if additional
tariffs on Chinese wire hangers were imposed, production would simply
shift to third countries, which could not be subject to section 421's
China-specific restrictions. In that event, import relief would have
little or no benefit for any domestic producer.
Additional tariffs would have an uneven impact on domestic
distributors of wire hangers. For some distributors, the tariffs would
likely lead to some income benefits. However, the tariffs would likely
harm other distributors in light of their business models.
Additional tariffs would also likely have a negative effect on the
thousands of small, family-owned dry-cleaning businesses across the
Other Popular 2003 Presidential Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |