Home > 1998 Presidential Documents > pd06ap98 Statement on House Action Against Legislation Proposing a Uniform...pd06ap98 Statement on House Action Against Legislation Proposing a Uniform...
State, our hearts, too, are with Westside, and with the grieving
families whose loved ones were killed or injured in that tragic incident
just 4 days ago.
This is the third time in recent months that a quiet town, and our
Nation, have been shaken by the awful specter of students being killed
by other young people at schools. We join the families of Jonesboro and
all America in mourning this terrible loss of young life, life so full
of promise and hope so cruelly cut short.
We mourn the loss of Natalie Brooks, of Paige Ann Herring, of
Stephanie Johnson, of Brittany Varner, and of a heroic teacher, Shannon
Wright, who sacrificed her own life to save a child. These five names
will be etched in our memories forever and linked forever with the names
of Nicole Hadley, Jessica James, and Kayce Steger of Paducah, Kentucky,
and Lydia Kay Dew and Christina Mennefee of Pearl, Mississippi. Our
thoughts and our prayers are with all their families today.
We do not understand what drives children, whether in small towns or
big cities, to pick up guns and take the lives of others. We may never
make sense of the senseless, but we have to try. We have seen a
community come together in grief and compassion for one another, and in
the determination that terrible acts like these must no longer threaten
our Nation's children.
Parents across America should welcome the news reported just this
month by Attorney General Reno and Education Secretary Riley that the
vast majority of our schools are safe and free of violent crime. We've
worked hard to make our schools places of learning, not fear, places
where children can worry about math and science, not guns, drugs, and
gangs. But when a terrible tragedy like this occurs, it reminds us there
is work yet to be done.
I have directed Attorney General Reno to bring together experts on
school violence to analyze these incidents to determine what they have
in common and whether there are further steps we can take to reduce the
likelihood of something so terrible recurring.
Already we've seen the remarkable difference community policing has
made in our Nation's streets. Now we have to apply that same energy and
resolve to our schools to make them safer places for children to learn,
play, and grow. At school there must be full compliance with our policy
of zero tolerance toward guns, and at home there should be no easy
access to weapons that kill.
Protecting our children from school violence is more than a matter
of law or policy; at heart, it is a matter of basic values, of
conscience and community. We must teach our children to respect others.
We must instill in them a deep, abiding sense of right and wrong. And to
children who are troubled,
[[Page 527]]
angry, or alone, we must extend a hand before they destroy the lives of
others and destroy their own in the process.
We have to understand that young children may not fully appreciate
the consequences of actions that are destructive but may be able to be
romanticized at a twisted moment. And we have to make sure that they
don't fall into that trap.
Three towns: Jonesboro, Pearl, Paducah--too many precious lives
lost. The white ribbons that flutter today in my home State of Arkansas
are a poignant and powerful challenge to all of us, a challenge to come
together for the sake of our children and for the future of our Nation.
Thanks for listening.
Note: The address was recorded at 12:52 p.m. on March 27 at the Cape
Grace Hotel in Cape Town, South Africa, for broadcast at 10:06 a.m. on
March 28.
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 527-532]
Monday, April 6, 1998
Volume 34--Number 14
Pages 525-568
Week Ending Friday, April 3, 1998
Remarks in a Roundtable Discussion on the Future of South Africa in
Johannesburg
March 28, 1998
The President. Let me first just thank all of you for taking the
time to come and meet with Hillary and me. We've had a fascinating trip
to Africa and a wonderful 3 days in South Africa, but I didn't want to
leave the country without having the chance to have kind of an informal
conversation with young people that are making the future of this
country. And I want you to say to us whatever you'd like to say, but I'm
especially interested in what you see are the main challenges today,
what you think the United States and others could do to be helpful.
The story of the liberation of South Africa is a fabulous story. As
I said last night in my toast to Mr. Mandela, one of our most eloquent
political leaders in America said that in democracies, campaigns are
conducted in poetry, but government is conducted in prose. And there is
always a lot of hard work that has to be done. And I think it's very
important that your generation maintain its optimism and energy, and
it's important that the rest of us continue to make a constructive
contribution to your efforts.
So I basically just want to listen today and hear what you have to
say. And if you have any questions for us, I'll be glad to answer them,
but I want to learn more about your take on your country and your
future.
Hillary, do you want to say anything?
Hillary Clinton. No, I would be happy just to start.
[At this point, Friendly Twala, a Ministry of Education district
education coordinator specializing in guidance and career orientation,
described his background and experience in mediation and conflict
resolution. Graeme Simpson, director, Center for the Study of Violence
and Reconciliation, described his work and suggested that violent crime
was perhaps the greatest threat to democracy and human rights in South
Africa.]
Mrs. Clinton. Why don't we go around and hear from everybody briefly
first, and then perhaps have a conversation about some of those issues?
[Bongi Mkhabela, Director of Projects and Programs in the office of
Deputy President Thabo Mbeki, stressed the need for integration of youth
issues into national policy and for training of the next generation of
leaders. Vasu Gounden, director, African Center for the Constructive
Resolution of Disputes, suggested sustainable aid and the African Crisis
Response Initiative as discussion topics and praised the Entebbe Summit
communique positions on democracy and civil society. Bongani Linda, arts
manager, Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, described
his work with prisoners and youth and suggested that cultural exchanges
could have a positive impact on youth in communities such as Soweto.
Kumi Naidoo, executive director, South African National NGO Coalition
(SANGOCO), urged that the U.S. Agency for International Development
remain involved in South Africa beyond the transitional period ending in
2002 and provide increased assistance to the nongovernmental sector.
Nicola Galombik, director of educational television, South African
Broadcasting Corporation, emphasized the importance of information and
technology to bridge the cultural and interpersonal divisions of
apartheid by carrying the messages and faces
[[Page 528]]
of all South Africans. Chris Landsberg introduced himself as incoming
head of the foreign policy program at the Center for Policy Studies in
South Africa, and referred to the fact that both he and Mr. Naidso had
studied at Oxford in the United Kingdom.]
The President. There are days when I wish we could all go back.
[Laughter]
[Mr. Landsberg stated that his country faces challenges in addressing
the needs and concerns of a formerly disenfranchised majority while
incorporating minorities in its society; avoiding a disconnect between
elite society and rural society and the poor; generating economic growth
and encouraging democracy in Africa; and encouraging its private sector
to find solutions for social problems. He expressed his hope that
partnership with the United States would have a positive impact.]
The President. Thank you.
Hillary, do you want to say anything?
[Mrs. Clinton agreed that there are challenges to democracies
everywhere, at all stages of their development. She asked about
coordinated efforts in South Africa to try to replace the enthusiasm for
liberation and freedom with a long-term commitment to a stable,
functioning democracy with full participation. A participant described
the new National Development Agency, which provides financing to
grassroots organizations and acts as a policy forum which reports to the
Parliament. Another participant suggested that people who had withdrawn
from public life after the end of apartheid might be brought back into a
struggle to end poverty. He also stated that businesses should offer
more than monetary contributions to nongovernmental organizations.]
The President. Let me ask a question, a followup question that may
seem almost simpleminded to you, but I think the answer--whatever answer
you give will give me some indication about where the conversation
should go. Why has the crime rate gone up so much in the last 4 years?
Anybody can take it.
[A participant suggested the crime levels had previously been under-
reported, but that gangs now offered youth the same type of subcultural
identity as anti-apartheid political parties had, with the added benefit
of wealth potential. He defined the problem as one of identity, culture,
economics, and education, and said the government had to confront its
lack of technical capacity to implement its policy.]
The President. I agree with that. Anybody else want to say anything
about the causes of crime?
[A participant stressed the need for career guidance in schools so that
more people would be prepared for employment, and for more aid to
education from NGO's as well as the government. Another participant
reiterated that crime figures were and still are unreliable and noted
the involvement of international organized crime. A participant then
stated that disadvantaged communities now have heightened expectations,
while unemployment is a major problem, and that crime levels discourage
foreign investment.]
The President. Let me just observe, I don't think it is an
insurmountable problem, and I think it would be certainly not grounds
for withdrawal of foreign investment.
But let me tell you a story about a different society. I went to
Riga, Latvia--Hillary and I did--a few years ago, and the last of the
Russian troops--the former Soviet Union--Russian troops withdrew from
the Baltics. And Riga is the largest northernmost port in the world, I
think. There are about a million people there. So the Baltic States are
finally free of Communist domination after decades. And we sit there,
and we're having this conversation like you and I are. We're having--
these three Baltic Presidents--and I ask them, what would they like me
to do--is to open an FBI office in Riga.
One of the most popular things we did was to open an FBI office in
Moscow. Why? Because they had this totalitarian, control-oriented
society, and when they ripped it away and substituted a democracy for
it, nature abhors a vacuum. And then besides that, there were a lot of
unemployed people who had positions in the apparatus. And they were
dealing with huge amounts of transnational crime, the kind of thing you
talked about earlier.
[[Page 529]]
Same thing happens at the local level; one of you mentioned this.
There is a pretty even distribution of international--and energy and
ambition in this world, whether it's out there on that play yard or in
the wealthiest neighborhood in the United States. And nature abhors a
vacuum. And we found--I'll never forget, once I was in Los Angeles when
the gang problem there was particularly intense several years ago, and
there was a three-page interview with a 17-year-old gang leader. And I
read this; I said, ``My God, this guy is a genius. Why did we lose this
young man? He's a genius.'' And when he was asked, ``Well, what are you
going to do when you're 25,'' he said, ``I don't expect to be alive.''
I think all this goes back to what you were saying at first, those
of you who worked in the NGO community, those of you that are worried
about the institutions of civil society. I think that for so long it was
obvious what the big problem was here, and you had to deal with the big
problem first. I mean, if you hadn't done that, you couldn't go on to
other things. And it was easy to organize the emotions and the energies
and the gifts of people toward that, whether they were young or older.
But then after that, you're left with a freer government, a more open
system, a more open society, but you still don't have all this
infrastructure. And there is no simple
answer, but I think that basically you have to have both more leaders and
more structures.
I think about--for example, in the United States, I just got a
report right before I left here attempting to analyze the reasons for
the big drop in crime in America in the last 5 years. And I may miss the
numbers, but this is roughly accurate, because I read it in a hurry.
Roughly, the people who did this research concluded that about 35
percent of the drop was due to an improving economy: more people had
jobs, and the gains of property crime and the risk of getting caught
were not so important. And a little less than that was due to improved
policing: more police officers and rooting them more closely in the
community, so that they worked with children and with families and with
block leaders to keep things from happening in the first place. And the
rest of it due to a whole amalgam of factors related to keeping mostly
young people out of trouble in the first place, giving them other things
to do.
The best example of structure I've seen since I got up this morning
is all those kids in their uniforms out there singing the song to me
when I got out. But in America we have the Boys Clubs, the Girls Clubs,
the YMCA, and all of those organizations, the scouting movement.
Those of us in government sometimes tend to be very almost
egocentric, and we forget what real people do with their time all day
every day, from the time they get up in the morning until they go to bed
at night. And most real people don't have all that much contact with us.
We fund the schools and the police officers driving around and other
things. So I think that our aid programs and a lot of our partnerships
ought to be focused on helping you develop more leaders and more
structures.
Hillary took me the first day we were in South Africa--we got in in
the middle of the night, and she made me get up early the next day
because she said, ``You've got to go back to this housing project that I
visited that's outside of Cape Town''--about, I don't know, 30
kilometers outside of Cape Town, to meet this woman who was in charge of
this community-based self-help housing project where poor people were
building their own homes. And you have to contribute to the membership
of the organization, so there was a remarkable amount of organization in
this very poor community and a lot of leadership. And I didn't ask
anybody, but I bet there is lower crime.
So my own view is, I look around here and I think, if you believe
that there is an even distribution of talent, intelligence, and ability
in more or less every place, then we have to have more people who have
the chance to go to Oxford and Georgetown, or Witwatersrand or wherever,
and whatever it takes.
You made some very specific suggestions that I thought were good.
I'll see what I can do to help get more
American athletes and entertainers to come here and relate to all sectors
of the society. We agree that the aid programs should be extended, that it
should not be replaced by trade, but instead supplemented for it. I will
see what I can do to
[[Page 530]]
do some more leadership training initiatives. And I'll see what I can do
with the business community. I'm going to dedicate a Ron Brown Commercial
Center here today, and I'll alter my remarks a little bit to reflect the
advice you just gave me.
But I just want to make the point that--I drive down these streets--
I wanted to come to this neighborhood so badly, and I admire you all so
much. But I can only say, when you get discouraged, just remember,
nature abhors a vacuum. There is an equal distribution of intelligence,
energy, leadership, and organizing ability. Bad things will happen when
Other Popular 1998 Presidential Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |