Home > 1995 Presidential Documents > pd07au95 Message to the Congress on Iraq...pd07au95 Message to the Congress on Iraq...
message will be simple: Fend for yourselves. Many people just won't be
able to do it.
As I said before, we often take for granted the security that comes
from Medicare. But according to a new study by the Department of Health
and Human Services, the congressional majority would push 500,000--a
half a million--older Americans into poverty by increasing the cost of
health care. And these cuts would force their families to make choices
between generations that no family should have to make.
We do need to protect Medicare from going bankrupt, but we don't
have to bankrupt older Americans to do it. None of the cuts driving
families into poverty would go into the trust fund. They would simply
pay for a huge tax cut for people who don't really need it. That's
unnecessary, and it's wrong. Medicare is too important to all families
to become a piggy bank for tax cuts for just a few. It's especially
important today because so many families are working harder and earning
the same or less than they did 10 years ago.
For all Americans, Medicare must remain a source of certainty and
security. For our parents, but also for our children, I pledge to do my
part to keep Medicare strong.
Thanks for listening.
Note: The President spoke at 10:06 a.m. from the Oval Office at the
White House.
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 1337-1342]
Monday, August 7, 1995
Volume 31--Number 31
Pages 1335-1381
Week Ending Friday, August 4, 1995
Question-and-Answer Session With Senior Citizens on Medicare
July 29, 1995
The President. Yes, Sarah [Sarah McClendon, McClendon News Service].
Q. What's your strategy? What's going to be the Democrats' strategy?
We can't live with this present condition, like this, we can't do it,
people are dying every day because they don't have preventive health
care. And what's going to be the strategy of the Democrats to overcome
this?
The President. Well, first of all, we're going to try to win as many
of the fights as we can as they come up. You know, yesterday we won a
really important victory in the House of Representatives where, really,
the first time since the new majority took over, over 50 Republicans
bolted and voted to protect the environment, a very important issue in
States like Florida and other States around the country. The House had a
bill before it that would literally strip the Federal Government of its
power to protect the environment. So that--and 50 Republicans joined
with almost all the Democrats and said, no, we're not going to do that.
So I think that we've got a chance now, a real chance to build a
sensible, common-sense, common ground majority. And that's what we're
going to try to do. I don't know that these Medicare cuts can pass the
Congress. And I'm certainly going to do what I can to defeat them.
That's our first strategy.
The second thing, to follow up on what you said, is that we believe
that if we're going to slow the rate of growth in Medicare spending
dramatically, without imposing great new costs on seniors and making the
system work, we ought to take a little of that money we're going to save
and put it into preventive care, to try to help people take care of
their parents or their grandparents outside of institutions, outside of
nursing home care. I think it would save money over the long run. It
wouldn't cost a lot of money to start, and we'd sure find out over the
next 2 or 3 years.
And in my budget, we do--we take some of that money to put into home
health care. We've put some of that money into respite care for people
with Alzheimer's. We do some other things with it, and we'll be able to
monitor over the next 2 or 3 years whether it saves money or not. I
think it will, and it doesn't have anything to do with stabilizing the
trust fund. So that's our strategy.
And I'm encouraged by yesterday's vote on the environment that there
may be some Republicans willing to brave the pressure, the enormous
pressure they've been under to toe the line, to do what's right for
America. So I'm encouraged.
Q. Mr. President----
[[Page 1338]]
Q. Larry, let's go do the discussion first and then we'll----
The President. Larry, what were you going to say?
Q. I'm sorry.
The President. I want to hear from all of you first, and then we'll
take the press questions.
[At this point, Mayor Norman Abramowitz of Tamarac, FL, asked the
President to continue the fight to protect Medicare and Medicaid and
asked if he would address the concerns of the younger generation and
their desire for change.]
The President. Well, you tell--first of all, tell them I won't give
up the fight. We've just begun the fight. But I think, to be fair, the
young people of our country are worried about their own future. And it's
an amazing time in our country. We've got--just since I've been
President, we've brought the deficit down, we've got 7 million new jobs,
we've got a record high stock market, we've got a record number of new
businesses. But a lot of people, including a lot of young people, are
working harder for less. They feel more and more powerless. And so a lot
of them think, well, maybe the answer is to turn against everything
we've done in the past, turn against programs like Medicare, turn
against the elderly, walk away from everything that's been done.
And the problem with that is, all they will do is make themselves
and their parents and their own future worse. We have to properly
analyze what's the matter, and we have to get the kind of change we
want. We do need to raise incomes as well as create jobs, just like we
need to stabilize the Medicare trust fund. People are living longer and
longer, so there are more people drawing Medicare. And the older you
are, on balance, the more you use the health care system. So the cost
per person goes up as people get over 80, let's say. But the answer is
to fix it in a way that won't break it and that won't bankrupt the
seniors of this country.
And I think it's--you know, I'm glad you mentioned Medicaid. A lot
of people think Medicaid is exclusively a program for young, poor people
on welfare. And two-thirds of Medicaid money goes to the elderly and
disabled. That's what funds the parents of middle class America who have
to go into nursing homes, for example. And if you look at the nature of
the Medicaid cuts, we're going to see a lot of middle class Americans
who will no longer be able to afford to send their kids to college
because they'll be paying for their parents in nursing homes if they can
afford to do that.
So, the answer--I think you ought to tell these young people, we are
in a period of change. And we have to change our Government policies to
be prepared for the 21st century. But the answer is to enable everybody
to make the most of their own lives, not to pit one generation against
another or one group of Americans against another. That is a dead loser
for this country. That is a really foolish thing to do. It helps a lot
of politicians win elections when they can pit people against one
another, but it doesn't help the country much. And we have never
progressed doing it. You look back in the whole history of America, we
have never taken one step forward by pitting one group of Americans
against another one, and we never will.
[A participant described a recent illness she suffered and explained
that she had been very concerned that Medicare would not cover the
expenses. She stated that she was fortunate that she had daughters to
help provide care for her but that the average older person cannot
afford the expense of a serious illness and the nursing care required.]
The President. But you know, your story illustrates a point that the
mayor just made. I mean, first of all, for about 10 years now, the
elderly in our country have had a lower poverty rate than very young
people. And that's a wonderful thing. And two things did it, the cost of
living on Social Security and Medicare. That's what did it.
Now, if we put another half a million older Americans in poverty
with this program, is that going to lift any little children out of
poverty? No. Is that going to help that young worker? No. All you're
going to do is take more money out of the incomes of middle class
working people who are working harder for less.
So the answer is to raise their incomes and increase their security.
The answer is not to
[[Page 1339]]
make this swap. And who would get the benefit of this, this tax cut? I
want to emphasize again, this money is not necessary to fix the Medicare
trust fund. They don't have to make this much savings.
And an enormous amount of this huge tax cut is going to people who
don't even need it, and many of them, frankly, don't want it. Many of
them do not want it. I've had a lot of upper income people tell me that
they do not want--they want to balance the budget, take care of
Medicare, invest in education, get this country going. So I--this is a
battle we have to win.
Yes ma'am. Go ahead.
[A participant described a letter the President sent her about
Medicare.]
The President. Bless you.
Q. And I know you want it because you wouldn't have done it. You
wouldn't have done this today. You didn't have to sit here.
The President. Thank you.
Go ahead.
[A participant stated that if Medicare and Medicaid were cut, a great
number of disabled and elderly people would fall below the poverty
line.]
Hillary Clinton. One of the concerns we have--and I think one of the
reasons the President wanted to do this, to go back to Sarah's question,
is there's a lot of misinformation out there. And I think, Mayor, that's
what some of the young people are responding to. And we're now seeing
ads being run that are trying to scare people and trying to say that,
you know, if we don't do what the majority in Congress wants to do, then
there won't be any Medicare. A lot of real scare tactics. And I think we
have to get the information out to people.
For example, there's a difference, as you know, between Part A and
Part B of Medicare. And what the President has proposed in his budget
will improve the trust fund. But the beneficiary cuts and the additional
costs that the majority in Congress want older people to have to pay out
of their own pockets have nothing to do with the trust fund.
The President. ----nothing to do with the trust fund.
Mrs. Clinton. See, this is one of those shell games. Remember when
you'd walk down the street and you'd see how fast people could do all
that, and I never could figure it out--well, it's going on again. But
it's going on in a much more serious way, trying to really keep the
balls moving so fast that they think that they'll fool people, and not
just fool older people but fool the children and grandchildren, so that
people will think, well, all they're trying to do is to fix the Medicare
trust fund, and so if people have to pay more--not remembering that 75
percent of the people on Medicare make less than $25,000 a year--so
where are they going to get the $2,000, the $5,000 to pay more? And it
has nothing to do with the Part B cuts, with the Part A trust fund.
So that's one thing that we have to keep explaining to people. And I
think the truth, as is often the case, is one of our most effective
arguments.
The President. A lot of people, like a lot of young people, don't
know. They'll see these ads, and they think, well, they're trying to fix
the trust fund. But I just want to remind--look, we need to do a little
history here. When--1993, when I gave the State of the Union Address and
I became President, I said, look, we've got to fix the trust fund. In
1994, I said, we have to fix the trust fund. When I presented health
care reform, I said, we have to fix the trust fund. A lot of these same
people, now, who are alarmed about the trust fund said, ``There's no
real problem, there's no health care crisis, what's he talking about?''
Then when a report comes out this year and it shows we've actually
improved things for the trust fund but we still have to fix it, they
say, ``Oh, we have to fix the trust fund, and that's why we need to load
all these costs on the seniors.'' But the costs--I want to say again
what the First Lady said--the costs being loaded on the individual
seniors do not go against the trust fund. They're being used to finance
an excessively large tax cut and to balance the budget at the arbitrary
date of 7 years.
And, you know, it is just not fair. I have never seen a time when
the seniors of this country were not willing to bear their fair share,
were not willing to make their own
[[Page 1340]]
contributions. You know as well as I do, modest changes have been made
in Medicare and Social Security over the years. That's not what this is
about. This is about just what Mr. Flemming said; it's about taking the
heart out of this program, to drastically change the way the
Government's priorities are. And it is wrong. And you and your children,
your grandchildren, in some cases your great-grandchildren, you've got
to stand up against it.
[A participant stated that she resented claims that the President and
the Vice President are scaring older people.]
The President. I'm not trying to scare anybody. But I am trying to
arouse----
Q. I'm defending you----
The President. I am trying to arouse the citizens of this country.
I've seen scare tactics. I've had them used against me and what I was
trying to do. I saw a couple hundred million dollars worth of scare
tactics last year when I was trying to secure your health care future.
So I know all about scare tactics. I'm not trying to scare you, but I
think it's wrong for people to go around with this little plan to mess
with your Medicare and try to keep the details of it secret until the
11th hour, then pop it through and have it all gone. And I think we need
to--this is like a covey of quail. We need to flush it--[laughter]--get
it out there and see what's going on here.
Go ahead, what were you going to say, ma'am?
[A participant said that she was concerned that Medicare cuts could
affect the number of older women who get mammograms.]
Mrs. Clinton. Well, I'm glad you raised that because we've got the
experts back there who run this program, and we know that one of the
barriers to older women getting regular mammograms is cost. And if we
make the cost of Medicare even more expensive for older people in
general, but particularly women, then the preventive health care that
they need--which will save us all money if people take care of
themselves and get those tests--will be lost as well.
And I want to say one other thing because I think this is part of
the--sort of the scare tactics as well that are being used. A lot of
people say, ``Well, families should take care of each other, and
families should be there for each other, and the Government shouldn't do
it.'' The majority leader has said, you know, he doesn't want any part
of Medicare; it shouldn't be a program in any free country, and
everybody should take care of themselves.
Well, I think everybody in this room certainly and most people I
know around the country do everything they can to help their parents.
Your daughters came to take care of you, and you're grateful that they
could. And we will continue to do that, financially, emotionally, in
every way we can. But there are two, I think, realities we have to look
at. There are a lot of older people who don't have those children and
those grandchildren. There are a lot of older people who have outlived
their children, who don't live anywhere near their children or their
grandchildren, who are in no position to be able to get any help. What
we are going to do with them, particularly all these older women who are
on their own?
And the second thing is that because a lot of young people are
struggling very hard for themselves I have no doubt they would make the
sacrifice if they had to, but with the cost of medical care, my
goodness, we will drive more young people into poverty if they have to
spend all of their assets to try to help take care of their parents and
their grandparents. That's why what we're talking about here is
something that doesn't just affect older Americans. It affects every
single American, no matter what our age. And I hope that people will
understand that more.
[A participant suggested that the President needs to be very clear about
Other Popular 1995 Presidential Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |