Home > 1997 Presidential Documents > pd07jy97 Statement on the Death of Jimmy Stewart...pd07jy97 Statement on the Death of Jimmy Stewart...
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page i-ii]
Monday, July 7, 1997
Volume 33--Number 27
Pages 991-1023
Contents
[[Page i]]
Weekly Compilation of
Presidential
Documents
[[Page ii]]
Addresses and Remarks
Electronic commerce initiative--1003
Madrid Summit sendoff by veterans--1018
Maryland, Public Service Campaign for Educational Excellence in
Baltimore--1010
Massachusetts
Departure for Boston--992
New England Presidential luncheon in Boston--995
New York City
Democratic National Committee dinner--1000
St. James Theatre--1000
Radio address--991
Tax cut proposal--992
Communications to Congress
Russia, most-favored-nation status, letter transmitting report--1000
Communications to Federal Agencies
Electronic commerce, memorandum--1006
Executive Orders
Adding Members to and Extending the President's Council on
Sustainable Development--998
Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices--998
Interviews With the News Media
Exchange with reporters on the South Lawn--992
Interview with European television journalists--1012
Letters and Messages
Electronic commerce, message to Internet users--1010
Independence Day, message--1011
Proclamations
To Implement the World Trade Organization Ministerial Declaration on
Trade in Information Technology Products and the Agreement on
Distilled Spirits--999
Resignations and Retirements
State Department, Chief of Protocol--1020
Statements by the President
See also Resignations and Retirements
Death of Jimmy Stewart--1012
Electronic commerce memorandum--1006
Supplementary Materials
Acts approved by the President--1023
Checklist of White House press releases--1022
Digest of other White House announcements--1021
Nominations submitted to the Senate--1023
Editor's Note: In order to meet publication and distribution deadlines
during the Fourth of July holiday weekend, the cutoff time for this
issue has been advanced to 5 p.m. on Thursday, July 3, 1997. Documents
released after that time will appear in the next issue.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF
------------------------------
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Register, National
Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, the Weekly
Compilation of Presidential Documents contains statements, messages, and
other Presidential materials released by the White House during the
preceding week.
The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is published pursuant to
the authority contained in the Federal Register Act (49 Stat. 500, as
amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the
President (37 FR 23607; 1 CFR Part 10).
Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of
Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers
for $80.00 per year ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign
subscribers for $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of
Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The charge
for a single copy is $3.00 ($3.75 for foreign mailing).
There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in
the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents.
[[Page 991]]
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 991-992]
Monday, July 7, 1997
Volume 33--Number 27
Pages 991-1023
Week Ending Friday, July 4, 1997
The President's Radio Address
June 28, 1997
Good morning. Today I'm speaking to you from the East Room of the
White House, where I'm joined by hundreds of America's brightest high
school students. These Presidential Scholars are here in our Nation's
Capital to learn how democracy works, and we know we can make it work
much, much better.
I want to talk to you this morning about steps I'm taking to open
the airwaves so voters have the loudest voice in our democracy, and
about responsibility of Congress to clean up the campaign finance
system.
Our democracy is the oldest and most successful in the world, but we
know that there is something wrong with the way we pay for elections.
Our campaign finance laws were last rewritten 23 years ago. For quite a
long while those laws worked well, but they have been overwhelmed by a
flood of money and the changes in the way we communicate with one
another and the cost of communication.
Spending in congressional campaigns has risen sixfold in the last
two decades. That's more than 3 times the rate of inflation. Now both
political parties are locked into an ever-escalating arms race, as they
compete to raise more and more money. There's simply too much money
required for campaigns, it takes too much time to raise, and it raises
too many questions.
In my State of the Union Address, I challenged the Congress to act
to stem the rising tide of campaign money by passing comprehensive,
bipartisan campaign finance reform by July 4th, the date we celebrate
the birth of our democracy. Unfortunately, Congress has made little
progress toward reform since that time, and it's clear that the
legislation will not pass, will not even be voted on by Independence
Day. That's too bad because there has been a significant number of
bipartisan support for the McCain-Feingold bill, which I have also
endorsed.
But now we shouldn't wait for Congress to act, and I'm not waiting.
Within my power as President, I've acted to advance key elements of
reform, and I'll continue to do so. First, I have petitioned the Federal
Election Commission to ban so-called soft money contributions, the large
contributions from corporations, labor unions, and individuals that both
parties raise. Bipartisan lawmakers led by Representatives Chris Shays
and Marty Meehan have asked for the same thing. I am pleased that the
FEC will begin formal proceedings on our request next month.
Second, our Justice Department will fight in the courts to uphold
efforts to limit campaign spending. We know how a spending spiral can
have dangerous consequences, but for two decades, court cases have made
it very hard to enact tough limits. Right now, strong spending limits
passed for elections in Cincinnati, and judicial elections across Ohio
are being challenged. We believe spending limits are constitutional, and
if we need to, we'll make that case to the highest court in the land.
And we're acting to address the single greatest reason for out-of-
control costs, spending on television. In 1972, candidates spent $25
million for political ads; in 1996, $400 million. We're the only major
democracy in the world that does it this way, and it doesn't have to be
this way. We can make our most powerfully effective medium a powerful
force for expanding democracy. Free TV time can help free our democracy
from the grip of big money.
For years I have supported giving candidates free time, and in fact,
Vice President Gore proposed legislation to do that a decade ago when he
was in the United States Senate. Now we're working to make it happen. In
March I called on the Federal Communications Commission to require
broadcasters to give candidates free time as a condition of
[[Page 992]]
receiving a new, lucrative license for high-tech digital TV. That's the
least we can ask of broadcasters, who are given access to the public
airwaves, worth billions of dollars, at no cost, with only the
requirement that they meet a basic public obligation. Today I'm
appointing two distinguished Americans to lead a commission that will
help the FCC decide precisely how free broadcast time can be given to
candidates as part of the broadcasters' public interest obligations.
Les Moonves is the president of CBS Entertainment and one of
America's most prominent and creative broadcasters. And Dr. Norman
Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, is one
of America's best known political scientists and a renowned expert on
campaign finance reform. Their commission will explore the details of
free time for candidates and other public interest obligations, such as
children's broadcasting, which may need to be updated.
All these steps are important, but still they're no substitute for
legislation. Again I say, Congress must act to pass comprehensive
bipartisan legislation. And as I said before, Senators John McCain and
Russ Feingold, joined by Representatives Shays and Meehan, have strong
legislation that would limit spending, end soft money, and give
candidates free time or reduced-rate TV time. I'm pleased to report that
Senators McCain and Feingold have announced they will bring their bill
to a vote later this summer in the Senate. This will be our first chance
to see who's for real on the issue of reform.
Needed change has been filibustered to death in every Congress for a
decade. In my first term, it was filibustered to death each and every
year. Now the same people who filibustered reform before, whose
obstruction gave us the present system, have vowed to do it again. Let's
let the people be heard. Let's not let them get away with it. Every
Senator must realize that a vote for a filibuster is a vote to continue
undue special interests influence, soft money contributions, out-of-
control spending, and continued public skepticism about the way the
political process works.
When it comes to fixing our campaign finance system, let's make this
summer a time not of talk but of action, not of recriminations but of
results. We have a rare chance to restore the trust and earn the
participation of the American people. The way we pay for elections is
broken; it's time to fix it. I ask for your support. And thanks for
listening.
Note: The address was recorded at 6:09 p.m. on June 27 in the East Room
at the White House for broadcast at 10:06 a.m. on June 28.
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 992-995]
Monday, July 7, 1997
Volume 33--Number 27
Pages 991-1023
Week Ending Friday, July 4, 1997
Remarks on Departure for Boston, Massachusetts, and an Exchange With
Reporters
June 30, 1997
Tax Cut Proposal
The President. Ladies and gentlemen, now that the two Houses of
Congress have completed action on their tax plan, I would like to make
some comments and offer my plan for what I think should be done with the
tax portion of the balanced budget agreement.
By way of background, let me point out again, as I have said many
times, I was determined to change the economic policy of the United
States Government when I became President. We abandoned trickle-down and
the big deficits and instead adopted an invest and grow strategy: reduce
the deficit, invest in the education and skills of our people, and make
sure we sold more American goods and services around the world. That has
contributed, along with the ingenuity, hard work, and productivity of
the American people, to the healthiest economy we've had in a
generation.
I want the balanced budget we ultimately pass to continue to
reinforce that strategy and our values. The agreement that we signed
with the Republican and Democratic leaders of Congress reflects the
invest and grow strategy. It is in balance with our values of honoring
work, strengthening families, and offering opportunity. It eliminates
the deficit, it invests in education, it extends health care for more of
our children while securing Medicare for our parents, and it provides
for an affordable tax cut for the American people.
America's families deserve a tax cut, and they deserve one that
reflects their values. It is, after all, the energy and dedication of
[[Page 993]]
Other Popular 1997 Presidential Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |