pd09mr98 Proclamation 7071--Women's History Month, 1998...

	Web GovRecords.org

Zev Yaroslavsky, members, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors; and 
California Highway Patrol officers Rick Stovall and Brit Irvine.


<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]


[Page 352-355]
 
Monday, March 9, 1998
 
Volume 34--Number 10
Pages 351-388
 
Week Ending Friday, March 6, 1998
 
Remarks at a Dinner for Senator Barbara Boxer in Los Angeles

February 28, 1998

    Thank you very, very much. First I want to thank all of you for 
being here for Senator Boxer and for your country. Thank you, Senator 
Torricelli, not only for being here and for your leadership on behalf of 
your fellow Democrats in the Senate and some of the people we hope will 
be joining us, but for always being willing to stand up and fight for 
what you believe in and not just standing--[applause]--thank you. The 
longer I stay in Washington, the more I come to appreciate people who 
will stand up and fight. And I thank you, Senator. [Laughter]
    I want to thank Ron and Jan for having us here. I don't believe, if 
I live to be 100, I don't believe I'd ever get tired of coming to this 
magnificent place. I'm sure they would get tired of me coming--
[laughter]--and are doubtless glad that I am term-limited, but I love 
coming here.
    I want to say just a couple of things tonight--and I've already 
eliminated all the

[[Page 353]]

stories I was going to tell because all the entertainers will be 
downgrading me if I tell a joke. Whoopi told me a funny story once, I 
think it's the funniest joke I ever heard, but I certainly can't tell 
that. [Laughter] It's not that bad, it's just too bad for me to tell in 
front of all of you, but it's really funny. [Laughter] If you file by 
the front table on your way out, she'll be glad to--[laughter]. That's 
the best I could do.
    Hillary and Chelsea actually wanted to be here tonight. We love 
Barbara Boxer, and she is now a member of our family, or we are a member 
of her family, or however it works, but anyway, we're all here together. 
And that's one of the reasons I came. But there are a couple of other 
reasons I wanted to talk about.
    I asked, when I came in, I asked Sim to talk to me about the race 
and Barbara to talk to me about the race, and they said one of the 
members of the Republican Party who wishes to oppose Senator Boxer had 
already spent almost $6 million on television ads, and that a lot of 
these television ads are trying to convince the California voters that 
she has not been a good Senator. Now, you be the judge.
    When I introduced the bill in 1993 that reduced the deficit 92 
percent before--before--a single dollar had been taken out from the 
balanced budget bill last year, we didn't have a vote to spare in the 
Senate--not a single one. Al Gore had to vote for it--it was a tie vote. 
And as he says, whenever he votes, we win. [Laughter]
    You know, being President has had all kinds of humbling experiences. 
[Laughter] And I'm sure you all have your top-10 list. But if anybody 
had ever told me 5 years ago I'd wind up being a straight man for Al 
Gore, I never would have believed that. Such are the burdens of office. 
[Laughter]
    Anyway, we didn't have a vote to spare--one vote. California--you 
know what it was like in 1992, 1991, 1993. Barbara Boxer voted yes 
knowing she had a difficult campaign, knowing it would be easier to walk 
away from, knowing that they'd be pounding the drums and saying all kind 
of terrible things. Five years later, we're on the verge of the first 
balanced budget in 30 years. The stock market went from 3,200 to over 
8,000. We've got the lowest unemployment rate in 24 years, the lowest 
crime rate in 24 years, the lowest welfare rolls in 30 years, the lowest 
inflation in 30 years, the highest homeownership in history. I think 
that's a pretty good record.
    I don't believe that $6 million in negative television ads, or $60 
million, or $600 million should be allowed to wipe away that fundamental 
truth. That one vote--that one vote--should get her the support of a 
huge majority of the people of California for reelection to the United 
States Senate. It's that important.
    But that's not all that happened. We also--you heard Senator Boxer 
talking about the decline in the crime rate now--we put more community 
police on the street. We were ridiculed for that bill by people like the 
folks that are advertising against her--ridiculed. Why? Because we also 
said, ``Okay, we'll put more police on the street and put them back on 
the beat, but we think we should take assault weapons off the street and 
we ought to spend some money to give kids something positive to do so 
that they have something to say yes to in life.'' And we were ridiculed. 
They said, ``Oh, this bill will be a failure; it's pork barrel; it's 
terrible''; and besides that, we're ``trying to take everybody's guns 
away from them.'' Well, 5 years later the Brady law has kept over 
300,000 people with criminal records from getting handguns. I don't know 
how many people are alive because of it, but a lot of people. And 
juvenile crime is going down again, and it's going down most in the 
communities where the kids are being dealt with as people and being 
given a positive future. So I think that's enough to justify reelecting 
Senator Boxer.
    And I could give you lots of other examples. I also believe you can 
just see, watch her standing up here--and she has to stand on this box 
that then they have to move away for me. But don't kid yourself, it's 
just a prop. [Laughter] It's designed to disarm the enemy. [Laughter] 
She's a very large person--a very large person. [Laughter]
    Washington is a place where too many people take themselves too 
seriously, where a lot of people profess to be profoundly religious but 
actually worship power, and where having a person who shows up every day

[[Page 354]]

more interested in people and interested in power as an instrument of 
doing good, not as an end in itself, is a very precious commodity. For 
that reason, Barbara Boxer should be reelected to the United States 
Senate.
    And finally let me say, as I said in the State of the Union Address, 
Hillary had this idea that we ought to honor the passing of the century 
and the coming of a new millennium with a set of gifts that she sort 
of--she gave me this idea, she said we ought to call it, ``Remembering 
the Past and Imagining the Future.'' And Barbara Boxer has a good 
imagination, and she thinks about her children and her grandchildren and 
the world we want to leave to them. And when the world is changing as 
fast as it is now, it's really actually rather difficult to predict what 
is going to happen next month. And it's difficult to know with absolute 
precision what's going to happen 30 years from now. But we know what 
challenges we have to face if we want the world to be a positive place 
30 years from now.
    So all those things that Senator Torricelli talked about--the 
efforts that we can now make because we do have a strong economy, 
because we do have budgetary discipline, because things are going well, 
we can now make an effort we need to imagine that future and to make it 
come true. That's what the education and the child care and the health 
care initiative is about; that's what the environmental initiatives are 
about. I don't think people will be making fun of us much longer, when 
we talk about climate change and global warming. You look at what El 
Nino has done this year in America, in southern California; can you 
imagine what can happen to our climate if the average temperature over 
the next 50 years went up another couple of degrees? People ask you what 
global warming is about--it's about that hole in the interstate here. 
It's about mud rushing down and carrying away the lives of innocent 
people. It's about malaria rising to the highest known altitudes on 
other continents and people carrying infections into airports and giving 
it to other people so now there's a phenomenon called ``airport 
malaria.''
    We like to believe that technology and intelligence and everything 
just defies all the laws of gravity and nature; it's just not so. The 
good Lord has a way of bringing us back to Earth, and we must return to 
Earth on this. We've got to meet our responsibilities to future 
generations. We do not have to give up economic prosperity. Every time 
we faced an environmental challenge in this country for the last 30 
years, when we've been working on it seriously, every single time people 
say, well, if you do this you'll hurt the economy; if you do that it 
will cost you jobs; if you do the other thing, you'll set everybody back 
and people won't be able to make a good living. It's been wrong every 
time; it is wrong now. We will find a way to find greater prosperity if 
we honor our obligations not only to preserve but actually to restore 
the planet and reverse this process of climate change that I believe is 
very destructive. And I hope you will support it.
    So there is a lot of stuff to do. We want to establish a medical 
research fund that will double funding for the National Cancer 
Institute, dramatically increase funding for the National Institutes of 
Health, increase overall scientific research spending, establish a space 
station in the sky that I think is very, very important for what happens 
here on Earth. And all of that is great and important, and all these 
issues I hope will be out there. But remember the second half of what 
we're trying to do for the millennium. We're trying to imagine the 
future, but also remember and honor the past.
    And I would just close with this, because it really does matter who 
these Senators are, what they're values are, what kind of memory they 
have, how they look at the world. They have enormous influence. And, 
yes, I want to do all these specific things I said. But all these 
specific things that we should do have to be seen against the background 
of our progress as a nation from the beginning into the future for, I 
hope, as long as human beings exist on this planet.
    That's why we want to preserve the Star-Spangled Banner. Believe it 
or not, we need $13 million to save the flag that led to our national 
anthem. We've got a lot of work to do just to save the Declaration of 
Independence and the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. And it's worth 
doing. There's a house where Abraham Lincoln and his family used

[[Page 355]]

to spend the summer by the Old Soldier's Home in Washington, D.C.--this 
little cabin, it's just about to go to pieces. We ought to save that. 
People pay a big price when they forget where they came from. And here 
in this county, there are parts of your past I hope you will find a way 
to save as a part of celebrating a new millennium.
    But if you go back through American history and you say, what were 
we all about when we started--at least what did we say we believed, and 
where did we fall short, and how do we do better; what was the Civil War 
about, where did we fall short, and how do we do better; when all these 
people quit working on the farm and moved to the cities, and all these 
immigrants came to America around the turn of the century and started 
working in the factories, were we falling short of our ideals, and how 
do we do better? What happened in the Depression; what happened in World 
War II; what happened in the civil rights movement; how did we fall 
short, and how do we do better? You look at all of it, and think about--
just go home tonight and think about this: Why did people come here in 
the first place? They wanted to get away from arbitrary, abusive, 
unaccountable power, to be free--remember the Declaration of 
Independence--to pursue happiness, and to form a more perfect Union so 
their children could do an even better job of being free to pursue 
happiness, to form a more perfect Union. Go back and read it, that's 
what it says.
    Now, did we live that way? Of course not. You had to be a white male 
property owner to have any influence in the beginning. And given my 
family's history, that means that I would have been much better off than 
Whoopi's, because we wouldn't have had any property. No, we weren't 
there. But it was the right idea. Freedom is better than oppression. 
Freedom, what? Not to have a guaranteed outcome, but pursue your own 
dream. And to form a more perfect Union so your children after you will 
do even better--not just materially but spiritually as well. That was 
the idea. You go back and think about every single turning point in the 
whole history of this country, and you will see that we had to ask 
ourselves the same old questions: How can we deepen the meaning of our 
freedom; how can we widen the circle of opportunity; how can we form a 
more perfect Union?
    I've had the chance to say many times now in the last several 
months; I want to say it one more time: The Republican Party represented 
the dominant party in America for deepening the meaning of our freedom, 
broadening the circle of opportunity, and forming a more perfect Union 
from the time Abraham Lincoln laid down his life to save this country 
until Theodore Roosevelt served as President. But from the time of 
Woodrow Wilson through Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman and John 
Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter down to the present day, we 
have not always been right, we Democrats, but we have always been on the 
right side of those three great issues in the 20th century.
    If you think about all of these great challenges we face and you 
listen to the rhetoric and you listen to the arguments that are made, 
strip it all away and take every single issue, and go home tonight and 
look at your kids, think about your grandkids or your nieces and nephews 
or all the people you care about, and ask yourself, ``What should I do 
as a citizen to deepen the meaning of freedom in my country, to widen 
the circle of opportunity so it embraces everybody, to give us a chance 
with all this diversity--this brilliant, blazing, confusing, complex 
diversity--to form a more perfect Union'' there may be more than one 
answer. But surely one answer is electing the people to public office 
like Barbara Boxer.
    Thank you, and God bless you. Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 9:15 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to dinner hosts Ron and Janet Burkle; comedienne 
Whoopi Goldberg; and Sim Farar, finance chair for Senator Boxer's 
reelection campaign committee.

[[Page 356]]




<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]


[Page 356]
 
Monday, March 9, 1998
 
Volume 34--Number 10
Pages 351-388
 
Week Ending Friday, March 6, 1998
 
Letter to Congressional Leaders Transmitting a Report on International 
Agreements

February 27, 1998

Dear Mr. Speaker:  (Dear Mr. Chairman:)

    Pursuant to subsection (b) of the Case- Zablocki Act, (1 U.S.C. 
112b(b)), I hereby transmit a report prepared by the Department of State 
concerning international agreements.
    Sincerely,
                                            William J. Clinton

Note: Identical letters were sent to Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House 
of Representatives, and Jesse Helms, chairman, Senate Committee on 
Foreign Relations. This letter was released by the Office of the Press 
Secretary on March 2.


<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]


[Page 356]
 
Monday, March 9, 1998
 
Volume 34--Number 10
Pages 351-388
 
Week Ending Friday, March 6, 1998
 
Message to the Congress Transmitting a Report on the Trade Agreements 
Program

Other Popular 1998 Presidential Documents Documents:

Other Documents:

1998 Presidential Documents Records and Documents