pd09no98 Statement on Signing the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998...

	Web GovRecords.org

the Palestinian Authority announcing the next move forward in the Middle 
East peace process. And I'm very grateful for the nice things people 
said about the role that I played, but it was my job. It's what you 
hired me to do. And I wanted to do it because of what I know about what 
is going on, my heartbreak over the loss and my hope over the potential 
of the region which is the home to all three of the world's great 
monotheistic religions. But what I want you to know is that if you liked 
that last Friday and it made you feel good about your country, pushing 
for peace, if you supported me, then you were part of that peace 
process.
    And today we announced we had another good quarter of economic 
growth. And I outlined what I was going to try to do to help these 
countries in trouble around the world because they buy our things. We 
live in a world anymore where it is not just our neighbors that have to 
do well, down the block, if we want to do well. Our neighbors around the 
world need to do well.
    If we want to bring opportunity back into the neighborhoods of New 
York City where it hasn't happened yet, we have to have some place that 
would be matched up with us as partners. So if they do well in the 
Caribbean, if they do well in Latin America, if we have closer relations 
with Africa, it actually will help us also to build up our own people, a 
lesson that those who study the Bible will not be surprised turned out 
to be true. But if you liked all that, if you supported me and my 
economic policies, you had a hand in it. It was your prosperity.
    I think of all the things Carl McCall has done as comptroller that 
no comptroller ever did before, all the people he tried to help--loans 
to 300 New York businesses, thousands of new jobs, millions available to 
women- and minority-owned businesses. Nobody ever did that before. In a 
real sense, it wasn't just him doing that. You did that. He's your hired 
hand just like I am. We have nothing that the people of New York and the 
United States don't give us under the constitutions under which we 
labor.
    Mr. Schumer wants to be a Senator. New York has had some great 
Senators. Robert Wagner--so many years ago the whole framework of our 
labor laws protecting the dignity of working people in the workplace--
Herbert Layman; Jacob Javits, a great Republican Senator; Senator 
Moynihan; Robert Kennedy. New York should have a Senator who can be very 
much in the mix of what needs to be done today and tomorrow, all the 
specific things, but also can help to lead the State and the Nation with 
a vision. He's that kind of person. I know him well, and I want you to 
help him.
    And if you think about this election, it's about choices--clear 
choices. And if you vote and if the people you know and love vote, and 
the things you want to have happen, happen, then it's not just those of 
us whom you elect doing it. It's you doing it. It's being Americans in 
the best sense and being rewarded in the highest sense.
    You know, we got some things done, some important things done, at 
the end of this last congressional session, but it's hard for 8 days

[[Page 2199]]

of progress to overcome 8 months of partisanship. And if you look ahead, 
we've got the largest number of children in our schools we've ever had, 
for finally we've got more kids in school than when I was there in the 
baby boom generation, taking a big burden off our generation I might 
add.
    But as a result--and more and more of these children are immigrant 
children. They come from families whose first language is not English. 
And more and more they find themselves in these great big classrooms 
where the teachers can't give them the individual attention they need. 
And we know now that the most important factor in having enduring 
learning gains for children, particularly if they're poor children, is 
to be in a small class in the early grades with a good teacher who can 
individually help them get off to a good start.
    So we said, we want 100,000 teachers in the early grades to take 
class size down to an average of 18 in the early grades. And then we've 
got all these wonderful old school buildings in New York with a lot of 
rooms and floors that aren't usable and that can't be hooked up to 
computers and things. And then we've got, in Florida and California, all 
these kids showing up and no buildings for them to be in. They're out in 
trailers out in the backyard somewhere, sometimes meeting in broom 
closets, literally. So we said we want to build or remodel 5,000 
schools, because if you're going to hire the teachers and you've got the 
kids there anyway, they need someplace to meet. And this Congress said, 
``No. No. No. We don't believe in that.''
    But we believe in that. If we had a little more balance, just a few 
more Democrats, we could get 5,000 more schools for America. That's what 
this issue is.
    One hundred sixty million Americans are in managed care, and we may 
well have more in the future. A lot of seniors want to be in managed 
care programs for Medicare because then they get a prescription drug 
benefit. It's a big issue.
    I have never been opposed to the managed care concept because when I 
became President, the inflation rate in health care costs was 3 times as 
high as the inflation rate in the economy, and it was bankrupting 
businesses and individual senior citizens, and it threatened to consume 
the country. So we had to have a better management of the money we were 
putting into health care.
    But no management system should be allowed to swallow up the purpose 
of the endeavor. And today you've got people--heartbreaking people--who 
were denied the care they should have gotten because insurance company 
bureaucrats or accountants said, ``No, you can't have it.'' You have 
people who get hurt in an accident, and instead of going to the nearest 
hospital emergency room, they're carted halfway across town through a 
bunch of red lights and waiting because that's the one covered in their 
plan.
    You have people in a plan, and their employer changes plans when it 
expires, but the worker may be pregnant or the worker's spouse may be 
undergoing chemotherapy--to be told to change doctors in the middle of 
one of those streams. You ever had anybody in your family on 
chemotherapy? I have. You know, it's a scary thing. And families try to 
pull together, and they want to make light of it. We made a lot of jokes 
in my family when my mother was on chemotherapy. Was she going to lose 
her hair or not? If she did, would the wig look better than her hair? 
You know, you try to make them laugh. But the truth is, you're scared to 
death. And you wonder if the person you love is going to get so sick 
they won't be able to eat anymore.
    And then in the middle of that, if somebody had told us, ``I'm 
sorry. We changed carriers. Now you have to change doctors,'' I don't 
know what I would have done. But it happens. And I could give you a lot 
of other examples.
    So we had this Patients' Bill of Rights. We said, look, we had 43 of 
these HMO's saying, ``Mr. President, you're right.'' We had a national 
commission of all kinds of people recommending this Patients' Bill of 
Rights. And we tried to pass it into law because it's not fair for some 
HMO's to do it and others not, and then the people that aren't behaving 
well to get rewarded by getting more customers who are healthy with 
lower prices.
    So we said, okay, everybody ought to--we're going to have a simple 
bill of rights for every patient. First of all, if your doctor tells you 
you ought to see a specialist, you

[[Page 2200]]

can see one. Secondly, if you get hurt, you ought to go to the nearest 
emergency room. Thirdly, if you're having treatment that's serious, you 
ought to be able to finish it, even if your employer changes health care 
providers. Fourthly, your medical records ought to be kept private and 
not invaded. Finally, in essence, health care decisions ultimately 
should be made by health care professionals and patients, not by 
accountants. That's what we say.
    Now--[applause]--you like that? If we had just a little more balance 
in the Congress, a few more Democrats, we wouldn't get beat on that 
Patients' Bill of Rights. If we had a few more people like Chuck Schumer 
in the House and in the Senate, we could give the American people a 
Patients' Bill of Rights.
    And the same thing is true on Social Security. You've heard all this 
debate about saving Social Security. Well, if you're on Social Security, 
relax, you're okay. What we're talking about is the baby boomers are 
moving to retirement. When they all retire, there will only be two 
people working for every one person drawing Social Security. The Trust 
Fund will be out of money in 2032, and we'll be into the Trust Fund in 
about 20 years. And if we make a few little changes now, modest changes, 
we can change and save this system in ways that we can all live with, 
and Social Security will be there.
    That's why I say, look, we waited 29 years to balance the books. 
I've worked for 6 years on it. And before the ink is even dry, the black 
ink, the leaders in the other party, they want to give it back in a tax 
cut before we save Social Security. Now it may be popular, but it's not 
right. It's not right. It is not right. We owe it to the next generation 
to make sure the baby boom generation can retire in dignity, without 
having to put a whopping tax increase on their children and undermine 
their children's ability to raise their grandchildren.
    You know, I grew up with a bunch of people who were mostly middle 
class folks at home. A lot of them didn't go to college, out there 
working for a living. They could use any kind of tax cut they could get. 
They liked the ones we've provided already for child care and for 
education. And they'd like some more. But I don't know anybody my age 
that is not plagued with the notion that because we're such a large 
generation, our retirement will put unconscionable burdens on our 
children and our grandchildren.
    Now, that's what this whole save Social Security thing is about. The 
pastors here who look after the flock and think about the generation, 
who work all the time at getting all of us, your sheep, to think about 
the long-run and not just what's in front of our nose. This is an issue 
that you can feel deeply. And this election is not an ordinary election 
because this is a generational thing. We have a few more people like 
Congressman Schumer in the Senate and the House--give a little more 
balance to this thing--we can save Social Security for the 21st century.
    So again I say to you, people like Carl McCall and Chuck Schumer, Ed 
Towns, our whole ticket, none of them get there by accident. And when 
they get there and do good things, we're not doing it alone. Every good 
thing I ever did, you had a hand in if you helped me be President. The 
mistakes were my fault. The good stuff you had a hand in. Don't you 
forget about it. And that is true of Carl McCall. That is true of Chuck 
Schumer. That is true of every public official.
    Somebody asked me the other day, how did you ever get those folks to 
agree at the Wye Plantation after 8 days. I said I was determined to be 
the last one standing. [Laughter] We were up for 39 hours. I didn't do 
that in college. [Laughter] I'm too old to do it now. [Laughter] I kept 
thinking of all those Scripture verses, you know, ``Let us not grow 
weary in doing good, for in due season, we shall reap if we do not lose 
heart.''
    I kept thinking, well, ``They who wait upon the Lord will mount up 
with wings--[laughter]--run and not grow weary; walk and faint not.'' I 
almost got to the end of that verse before we got peace the other day. 
[Laughter]
    Now, on Tuesday, the people that we need to be there, a lot of them 
will be tired. A lot of them will be hassled. A lot of them don't make 
much money. A lot of them have enough trouble just figuring out how to 
get the kids to child care or school and get back and forth from work 
and get the kids home

[[Page 2201]]

and ever have everybody in one piece by dinner time. And America is one 
of the countries--still--votes on a work day. It's a real hassle for 
them.
    A lot of them depend on mass transit to get back and forth to work, 
and the voting place is not on the same bus line or the same subway 
route. It's a hassle. Just remember, everybody that doesn't show can't 
gripe Wednesday morning. And everybody that does show is then a part of 
every good thing that flows from their decision if they're in the 
majority.
    I want you to think about how you want to feel Wednesday morning. 
And I want you to think about it. If you felt good during the Middle 
East peace process, if you felt good when John Glenn went up into space, 
if you felt good when I was able to tell you we were going to get 
100,000 new teachers, if you felt good when I talked about those 54 
Federal judges, if you believe in your heart that you have been a part 
of my Presidency--and I tell you you have; I wouldn't be here without 
you--then I ask you this one thing: Realize that this, too, is an 
important election, that it is not an ordinary time; it is, therefore, 
not an ordinary election; that what happens, all these people who will 
win races on Tuesday, will be a direct result, not only of how you vote 
but even more importantly, whether you vote.
    You will come in contact with thousands of people between now and 
then. And when the Scripture said that, we are all admonished to render 
unto Caesar those things which are Caesar's, well I'm not Caesar, and 
we're not a dictatorship or an empire, but you know what the Bible 
means. It's more today. When that Scripture was written all that meant 
was, pay your taxes. Nobody had a vote. Nobody had a vote.
    Today you've got the vote. You can actually be in the driver's seat. 
There is no Caesar without you--[laughter]--unless you sit it out. Our 
adversaries, they think a whole bunch of you will stay home. They know 
it's going to be a hassle. They know it will be an effort.
    But you just remember every good thing that you've felt good about 
in the last 6 years. And you think about how you want to feel Wednesday 
morning. We need to reelect Carl McCall and all America needs to know 
about Carl McCall, not just New York. All America needs to know about 
Carl.
    We need to send Chuck Schumer to the Senate because all America, and 
not just New York, needs that. We need to get that balance back in our 
Congress so we can do some of these things that we can't get done now. 
But it all depends on you. It all depends on you.
    I am more grateful than you will ever know for the friendship and 
the support of the people of New York, to me, to my wife, to my Vice 
President, to our administration; for the friendship and support of the 
African-American community, and especially the clergy. But the thing 
about this kind of work is, you never get to stop. You never get to 
stop.
    In the last week we've had a lot to celebrate. You had your hand on 
John Glenn's shoulder. You had your prayers answered about the continued 
process of peace. You can think about your children's future with 
100,000 more teachers. But there are huge fights out there left to 
fight--huge. And we need you.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 4:45 p.m. in Ballrooms B and C at the 
Ramada Plaza Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to human rights activist 
Rev. Wyatt Tee Walker, Canaan Baptist Church of Christ; James Forbes, 
pastor, Riverside Church; Carl McCall, New York State comptroller and 
U.S. Senate candidate; Bishop Norman Quick, pastor, Childs Memorial 
Temple, Church of God in Christ; civil rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton; 
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu of Israel; and Chairman Yasser Arafat 
of the Palestinian Authority. This item was not received in time for 
publication in the appropriate issue.


<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]


[Page 2201-2202]
 
Monday, November 9, 1998
 
Volume 34--Number 45
Pages 2197-2274
 
Week Ending Friday, November 6, 1998
 
Statement on Signing the Technology Administration Act of 1998

October 30, 1998

    Today I am signing into law H.R. 1274, the ``Technology 
Administration Act of 1998.'' The Act strengthens the technology 
programs of the Department of Commerce to meet the challenges of the 
21st century.
    The Act will enable the Commerce Department's National Institute of 
Standards and Technology (NIST) to better serve the

[[Page 2202]]

Nation's more than 380,000 smaller manufacturers by eliminating the 6-
year sunset provision for Federal co-funding of NIST Manufacturing 
Extension Partnership centers.
    The Act also authorizes NIST to establish a program to help 
elementary and secondary school teachers to convey to their students 
important lessons in measurements, manufacturing, technology transfer, 
and other areas in which NIST researchers possess world-class expertise.
    I am especially pleased to sign this legislation because it includes 
an initiative that I have sought for the past 2 years: expansion of the 
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award to include education and health 
care organizations. The Foundation for the Malcolm Baldrige National 
Quality Award deserves special credit for its work to endow this 
expansion, as does NIST, which manages the program in close cooperation 
with the private sector. Now the Federal Government can do its share to 

Other Popular 1998 Presidential Documents Documents:

Other Documents:

1998 Presidential Documents Records and Documents