pd10jn02 Telephone Remarks to Race for the Cure Participants...

	Web GovRecords.org

to the ground to save somebody else's life.
    You see, it's that sense of serving something greater than yourself 
that we all can do--that we all can do--by showing compassion and 
decency and love. And as a result, we will show the world the true 
strength of America. We're going to keep the peace by being strong 
militarily and by doing our job, and we will win the war by being a 
compassionate, decent, honorable nation.
    It is such an honor--such an honor--to be the President of such a 
grand country. Thanks for giving me the chance.
    May God bless you all. May God bless America.

Note: The President spoke at 11:50 a.m. at the Statehouse Convention 
Center. In his remarks, he referred to Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas.


<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]
                         

[Page 953-956]
 
Pages 943-975
 
Week Ending Friday, June 7, 2002
 
Remarks in a Discussion on Welfare Reform in Little Rock, Arkansas

June 3, 2002

    The President. Mike, thank you very much. I'm real fond of your 
Governor. I've known him for a long time. As he said, thankfully I took 
the hot dog out of my hand before I shook his hand. You were probably 
the guy yelling, ``More pitching,'' though. [Laughter]
    But it's great to be here with Mike in a State that--whose Governor 
works hard to find innovative ways to help people. And we're going to 
spend some time today talking about how best to help people go from 
welfare to independence and dignity. That's what we're really here to 
talk about.
    Before I do though, I do want to say that I am working hard to 
secure the country. My vision is for a country that is not only more 
secure but also a country that is better. And so we're going to talk 
about the ``better'' part, how best to help people. I picked--the first 
way to start is to pick a good Cabinet. I've really done that. I'm 
surrounded by great people on not only the foreign policy side, on the 
national security side of my administration, but also on the domestic 
side.
    Tommy Thompson was a Governor, a friend of Mike and mine, Governor 
of Wisconsin, and did a terrific job of heralding education reforms and 
welfare reforms in his State. So I figured if a person could do a good 
job of helping people find work in Wisconsin, why not bring him to the 
Federal level? Not only is he successful as a Governor, but he also 
understands that Governors need flexibility and authority in order to 
meet the goals that we all want. And so Tommy is a person who trusts the 
people of Arkansas to figure out the best way to take care of the people 
of Arkansas. And he's doing a great job as the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services. So I appreciate you being here, Tommy.
    I want to thank your two United States Senators for traveling with 
me today, Tim Hutchinson and Blanche Lincoln. I appreciate you all 
coming. Congressman Boozman is here as well. I want to thank him for 
being here. The Lieutenant Governor--there's the Lieutenant Governor; 
I'm glad that Governor Rockefeller is here. I want to thank the mayor 
for being here as well--and other elected officials. I appreciate you 
coming to hear this discussion, because it's an important discussion for 
Arkansas.
    I want to thank Mark Evans. There's a lot of stories that I've 
already learned in one brief car ride about Pastor Evans. They're all 
good, by the way. [Laughter] Instead of building a house of worship, the 
first thing he's going to do is build a place to help people, a welfare-
to-work training center. I thought that was--and in the meantime, I 
guess you'll have your services here.
    Well, that's really important. See, I like to remind people that 
governments can pass out money. What government cannot do is put love in 
people's heart or hope in people's lives. And one of the things I feel 
most passionate about is how to capture this great strength of the 
country and help church and synagogue and mosque interface with people 
in need. The best welfare programs at many places are really found 
inside--inside houses of worship. And that's what's happening here. It's 
interesting, we're having this discussion on how to move people from 
welfare to work in a house of worship, and we're going to hear from 
three brave ladies here in a second about how this--this church, in this 
case, is helping--or two of the ladies--

[[Page 954]]

helped them find dignity in their lives and hope for their families.
    I want to talk a little while before we turn it over to the people 
that matter a heck of a lot more than me and Tommy--for that matter, 
Huckabee--[laughter]--and that is the heroines of welfare reform. But 
first, the law that was passed in 1996 has been a great success. Senator 
Hutchinson, as a matter of fact, was on the conference committee that 
was a part of writing this law. It's been a huge success in America.
    It's important for Americans to understand, when they hear the talk 
about welfare reform, that the '96 law has made a significant difference 
in millions of people's lives. As a matter of fact, Tommy's releasing a 
report today, and he can elaborate on that a little later, that details 
the successes of welfare reform: 5.4 million people fewer--fewer people 
in poverty in 2000 than in '96. A lot of it had to do with the Nation 
making a concerted effort to move people from welfare to work. And so 
when we talk about the reauthorization, which means we've got to extend 
it somehow in Congress, it's important for the Congress to recognize 
that this has been an incredibly successful piece of social policy.
    Secondly, part of the reason why it's worked so well is because of 
work--that there is a work requirement. In order to make sure that we 
continue with good welfare law and good social policy, we should not 
weaken the work requirement in welfare. We ought to set high standards 
and aim for those standards. Anything that weakens the work requirement 
in a welfare reauthorization bill hurts the people we're trying to help. 
And it's important to remember that.
    One of the interesting things--you'll hear people say, ``Well, there 
needs to be more money.'' Of course, that's always an argument in 
Washington, and I'm aware of that argument. The budget that we submitted 
up there has got $17 billion. It's the same level that has been in place 
in the past. But what's interesting is that the caseload has declined by 
50 percent. That's part of the success of the '96 law. So if you've got 
the same money with half the number of cases, we doubled the amount of 
money available to all people. And that's important for the Congress and 
the appropriators to understand, that if you keep the funding level the 
same and the caseload is half, you've got twice the amount of money to 
help.
    Thirdly, that it's also important to say that part of the work 
requirement is, you've got to work 40 hours a week. In other words, work 
is work. We can play like it's not work, but that doesn't help people 
we're trying to help. The play-like world is the world that these ladies 
struggled to get out of. They wanted the real world of dignity and work 
and to be able to raise their families. And so when I asked Congress to 
say 40-hour workweek, we mean that.
    Now, I recognize some people need extra help. There needs to be some 
extra education or some extra job training, and so part of the 40-hour 
workweek can go to job training. As a matter of fact, 16 hours of the 
40, if need be, should be set aside for job training or education 
purposes. And that's in the bill I've submitted and passed the House of 
Representatives.
    And finally, it's very important that we give States maximum 
flexibility. The problem with Washington is, oftentimes Washington 
thinks on behalf of people just because some in Washington think that 
the only place where smart people live is in Washington. That's not 
really the case. [Laughter] There's a couple smart ones up there, but 
not all the brains in America are in Washington, DC. Therefore, we ought 
to trust the local folks. We ought to trust the Governors more. As a 
former Governor--and Tommy's a former Governor--we understand that the 
more flexibility in the welfare law or the education law, for that 
matter, the more likely it is we're going to achieve important social 
goals and social objectives.
    And so the bill I've submitted that passed the House is a bill 
that's got adequate funding. It's got the need to--it's got high 
standards, and that's what we want. If you lower the bar and lower the 
standards, you're not going to get the results you want in society. We 
believe that people can achieve.
    And the final ingredient that needs to happen is, is that we need to 
get the Faith-Based Initiative out of the United States Senate, too. 
It's an initiative that recognizes that--that while on the one hand we 
don't want

[[Page 955]]

the church being the state, or the state being the church, we shouldn't 
discriminate against programs that come out of faith-based institutions, 
all aimed at helping people help themselves.
    Listen, some of the best drug treatment programs and alcohol 
treatment programs are programs that first help change a person's heart, 
so they can make better choices in their lives. And so I'm--I've come to 
this house to herald the programs, to call upon a good law, for 
starters, out of Congress--out of the Senate, so we can get it to the 
Senate and the House, and get it to my desk, and give these Governors 
time to plan to help people.
    But I also come here because I recognize that some of the greatest 
social programs in the country come out of houses of worship of all 
faiths--of all faiths. And so Pastor Greg, I want to thank you for your 
leadership. I want to thank you for helping to live the adage--you want 
to love a neighbor like you'd like to be loved yourself. And I 
appreciate a man who not only preaches but a man who does.
    Thanks for giving us a chance to be here.

[The discussion began.]

    The President. You did great. Thank you very much. I appreciate you, 
Vivian. Probably would be helpful if some of the dads paid their child 
support, don't you think?
    Participant. Yes.
    The President. Pastor, you've done great. I appreciate it. Thanks.
    Thank you, ladies, for sharing your stories. There's millions of 
stories like yours, single moms who struggle to get ahead. By the way, 
being a single mom is the toughest job in America. It's the toughest 
job.
    And so long as there's pockets of hopelessness, this country must 
act--it must act. Anytime we find somebody who hurts, we've got to love 
them. I tell people, if you want to fight evil, the evil done to 
America, you do some good.
    And the other interesting thing about what you all have done is, 
your example serves to help save somebody else's life. And I want to 
thank you for that and thank you for sharing with us and the country 
your great stories. You did really well, very good job by all three of 
you.
    I want Tommy to say a few words. Tommy is in charge of getting the 
law through the Senate, getting the differences between the House and 
the Senate reconciled and on my desk and then making sure it's 
implemented in the right spirit. But Tommy, do you mind saying a couple 
of things?

[At this point, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson 
made brief remarks.]

    The President. Pastor, there's a couple of other things in the bill 
that might interest the people here. One of the things that we try to 
promote in the bill is family, and we set aside money for grant programs 
to States to encourage families to stay together. Now I recognize, not 
all families are going to stay together. But the more families we save, 
the more likely it is a child is going to have a good chance of making 
it here in the country.
    And so there's a strong initiative in there to promote families, to 
help people who are about to get married to understand the consequences 
of marriage, and then to help people who are married who know they need 
to save their marriage, help them save that marriage. The family is an 
important part of the future. And that money, as far as I'm concerned, 
should be available for programs that work. We ought to be asking the 
question, what works, and get out of the process-oriented world that we 
sometimes find ourselves in Government. And I know that, Pastor Evans, 
you've got a family initiative in your church, and I want to thank you 
for that.
    The other thing--the other part of the bill that obviously gets a 
lot of heat, but it's one that I think makes a lot of sense, is that we 
promote abstinence as well. We can argue the merits of it--whether or 
not it would be a part of the bill, but I tell you this: If you're 
interested in what works, it works 100 percent of the time. [Laughter]
    So the bill is comprehensive in that sense, and it's all aimed at 
helping people--it's--that and this education reform. Listen, I want 
your kids to go to college, and I want your kids to get the best 
education possible. And we've passed a pretty good bill out of 
Washington. It really does empower the State of

[[Page 956]]

Arkansas more than ever before. And it says, every child can learn. I 
mean, it starts with this premise, every child--it doesn't matter how 
your children are raised, what the mom does for a living--every child 
can learn.
    It also sets high standards. And see, I'm the kind of fellow who 
believes in raising that bar. I believe in the best. I don't want 
mediocrity. I want excellence in everything we do. And so I'm confident 
that the bill that is being debated up there now, combined with the 
education bill, it's really going to make America a much more hopeful 
place for every single citizen, not just a few of us, not just a group 
of us, but every citizen. And that's really what we're aiming for.

Note: The discussion began at 1:05 p.m. at The Church at Rock Creek. In 
his remarks, the President referred to Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, 
who introduced the President; Lt. Gov. Win Rockefeller of Arkansas; Mark 
Evans, senior pastor, and Greg Kirksey, pastor, The Church at Rock 
Creek; and Mayor Jim Dailey of Little Rock. The discussion participants 
were Spring Davidson, Jeanette Cain, and Vivian Webb.


<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
 [frwais.access.gpo.gov]
                         

[Page 956-958]
 
Pages 943-975
 
Week Ending Friday, June 7, 2002
 
Exchange With Reporters at Fort Meade, Maryland

June 4, 2002

Intelligence Prior to September 11

    The President. How are we doing?
    Q. Not bad, sir. I wanted to ask you, yesterday you said in Little 
Rock that a better job could have been--a better job needs to be done to 
prevent terrorism. Does that mean, in hindsight--which, obviously, is 
20/20--a better job could have been done?
    The President. Well, I think there's no question that the FBI, for 
example, did not have as its primary mission a prevention of an attack, 
and now it does. In other words, the FBI was a fine law enforcement 
agency, chasing down white collar criminals and people that were 
committing crimes in America. And that's good, and that's still an 
important function of the FBI. But now the focus is on--the primary 
focus is on preventing a further attack. So the mission has changed, and 
that's a positive change.
    In terms of whether or not the FBI and the CIA were communicating 
properly, I think it is clear that they weren't, and that they--now 
we've addressed that issue. The CIA and the FBI are now in close 
communications; there's better sharing of intelligence. And one of the 
things that is essential to win this war is to have the best 
intelligence possible and, when we get the best intelligence, to be able 
to share it throughout our Government.
    And as you've seen the reforms that both Director Tenet and Bob 
Mueller have put in place, a lot of those reforms had to do with how 
able--the two are able to talk to each other. And it's a very positive 
reform.
    Q. If the reform had been put in place beforehand, if the FBI had 
been----
    The President. Well, it's hard--it's hard--I haven't seen any 
evidence----
    Q. ----could the attacks have been stopped?
    The President. I've seen no evidence to date that said this country 

Other Popular 2002 Presidential Documents Documents:

Other Documents:

2002 Presidential Documents Records and Documents