Home > 1995 Presidential Documents > pd25se95 Statement on House Action To Reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act...pd25se95 Statement on House Action To Reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act...
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 1-iii]
Monday, September 25, 1995
Volume 31--Number 38
Pages 1569-1667
Contents
[[Page 1]]
Weekly Compilation of
Presidential
Documents
[[Page 2]]
Addresses and Remarks
California
Departure from Santa Monica--1664
Exploratorium in San Francisco--1632
Fundraiser in Los Angeles--1654
Fundraiser in San Francisco--1634
Colorado
Fundraiser in Denver--1623
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged in Denver--1608,
1615
Pueblo Community College in Pueblo--1619
Florida
Community in Jacksonville--1589
Departure from Jacksonville--1592
Fundraiser in North Miami Beach--1604
Senior citizens in North Miami Beach--1594, 1600
Pennsylvania
Community leaders in Philadelphia--1576
Fundraiser in Philadelphia--1578
Radio address--1573
Senior citizen organizations--1569
Communications to Congress
Angola, message reporting--1587
Iran, message reporting--1584
Transportation Department report on highway safety, message
transmitting--1663
Communications to Congress--Continued
UNITA, message transmitting notice--1588
Communications to Federal Agencies--
Lebanon, memorandum on travel--1575
Rwanda and Burundi, memorandum on assistance--1631
Executive Orders
Amendment to Executive Order No. 12425--1572
Amendment to Executive Order No. 12958--1589
Interviews With the News Media
Exchange with reporters in Santa Monica, CA--1664
Interview with Larry King in Culver City, CA--1640
Letters and Messages
Children's Television Act of 1990, letter to the Chair of the
Federal Communications Commission--1589
Rosh Hashana, message--1623
Notices
Continuation of Emergency With Respect to UNITA--1588
(Continued on the inside of the back cover.)
Editor's Note: The President was in San Diego, CA, on September 22, the
closing date of this issue. Releases and announcements issued by the
Office of the Press Secretary but not received in time for inclusion in
this issue will be printed next week.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF
------------------------------
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Register, National
Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, the Weekly
Compilation of Presidential Documents contains statements, messages, and
other Presidential materials released by the White House during the
preceding week.
The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is published pursuant to
the authority contained in the Federal Register Act (49 Stat. 500, as
amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the
President (37 FR 23607; 1 CFR Part 10).
Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of
Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers
for $80.00 per year ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign
subscribers for $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of
Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The charge
for a single copy is $3.00 ($3.75 for foreign mailing).
There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in
the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents.
[[Page iii]]
Contents--Continued
Proclamations
Citizenship Day and Constitution Week--1575
Gold Star Mother's Day--1662
National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week--1663
National Rehabilitation Week--1572
Statements by The President
Bosnia, decision to end airstrikes--1622
Death of Helen McLarty--1583
Statements by The President--Continued
House action to reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act--1608
Supplementary Materials
Acts approved by the President--1667
Checklist of White House press releases--1667
Digest of other White House announcements--1665
Nominations submitted to the Senate--1666
[[Page 1569]]
<DOC>
[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents]
[frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[Page 1569-1572]
Monday, September 25, 1995
Volume 31--Number 38
Pages 1569-1667
Week Ending Friday, September 22, 1995
Remarks to Representatives of Senior Citizens Organizations
September 15, 1995
Thank you very much. I'm delighted to see all of you. I'm glad to
see you with your buttons and your--apparently, with your spirits
intact. That's good. [Laughter]
As all of you know, we're having this huge debate in Washington
today about the future of this country. I want to try to put this
struggle over Medicare and Medicaid into some kind of proper context so
that you can take it not only to the Members of Congress and to your own
members but out to the American people at large.
There is an enormous consensus in our country, with which I agree,
that we ought to pass a budget this time that will bring our books into
balance by a date certain. I agree with that. We got into a bad habit,
this country did, before I showed up here, in the eighties and the early
nineties, of running a permanent deficit, not to invest, to grow the
economy, to create jobs, but just because every year we preferred to
spend more money than we were taking in. And it wasn't good for the
country. We're on the verge of paying more in interest next year than we
pay for defense, for example. And every year we keep doing that, we
spend more and more on interest, and we have less and less to spend on
everything else.
But why do we wish to do that? What are the values implicit in that
choice? We do it because we want to free our children and our
grandchildren from the burden of unnecessary debt. We do it because we
don't want to have a country where the Government is taking all the
money and the money will be free to be borrowed by private businesses to
create jobs and to grow the economy. We do it because we think morally
we'll be a stronger country if we don't just borrow money for the sake
of borrowing it.
But our objectives will be undermined if we forget about the other
obligations we have. That's why I've said, you know, we ought to balance
the budget, but why would we cut education and thereby hurt the economy
and hurt the future of the very children we're trying to help? Why would
we undermine our ability to protect the environment and public health
and thereby erode the very quality of life we say we're strengthening by
balancing the budget?
And the same thing is true here. We have historically recognized
significant obligations to the health care of people who are entitled to
be taken care of through the Medicare program or, through no fault of
their own, have to be given some assistance. It's a part of who we are;
it's a part of what kind of country we are.
And that's what this fight over Medicare and Medicaid is all about.
What are our obligations to each other? How are we going to fulfill
them? This is a compact between the generations, a compact we have
honored now for three decades. It has made America a stronger, better,
more humane place. It has made family life more secure not only for
seniors, not only for Americans with disabilities, but for their family
members, their hard-working family members who knew that they got a
little help so that they could all fulfill their responsibilities. These
are the values I would argue that we want to advance as we try to
balance the budget. We don't want to undermine them. We want to do this
in a way that will bring the American people together, not tear the
American people apart. That is what I am working to do here.
It is truly ironic that this whole Medicare fight is being played
out against the background of the trouble that the Trust Fund is in.
Where did you hear that first? From me, right? And in 1993 and 1994,
when I said the Medicare Trust Fund is in trouble, we have to do
something to lengthen its life, we have to do the responsible thing and
keep
[[Page 1570]]
it strong, and I proposed solutions to keep it strong, some of those who
are for cutting Medicare $270,000 billion today said that I was raising
a red herring, that it wasn't really in trouble, and why were we even
worried about this. How quickly they forget.
But, thanks to the responsible people in the Congress in the last 2
years, we extended the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by 3 years. And
in my balanced budget proposal, we extend the life of the Medicare Trust
Fund by more than a decade from this day forward, making it in better
shape than it's been in 9 of the last 15 years. That is what we have
proposed to do and to do it without imposing new costs on seniors.
Now, the congressional Republicans have outlined their plan to
balance the budget, which includes a $270 billion Medicare cut--3 times
the size of any previous cut--and a $180 billion Medicaid cut. Together
that's nearly half a trillion dollars taken out of the health care
system over the next 7 years. I doubt seriously that the health care
system can afford that. And that, again, affects all of us, not just
people on Medicare, not just people on Medicaid. Almost half a trillion
dollars.
Their plan would increase premiums and other costs for senior
citizens. It would reduce doctor choice. It would force many doctors to
stop serving seniors altogether. It threatens to put rural hospitals and
urban hospitals out of business. Brick by brick, it would dismantle
Medicare as we know it.
Now, here's the point. If all this were necessary, really necessary
to save Medicare, maybe we'd all be willing to do it. But it isn't. And
that is the point that has been missing from all this public debate, the
point I tried so hard to make yesterday, the point you know but, I have
to tell you, most of your fellow Americans, even members of your various
groups who are on Medicare, do not know: The proposed reductions in the
congressional or Republican congressional plan in Medicare spending on
providers do go into the Trust Fund; the proposed increased costs on
seniors do not go into the Trust Fund, as a matter of law.
So all this conversation we have heard about saving the Trust Fund--
give them their due, when they're talking about holding back money from
Part A to the hospitals and the doctors, they're telling the truth; that
will go into the Trust Fund. But the extra cost to seniors, by law, will
not go into the Trust Fund. You know it, and I know it, and everyone in
America should know it. Every nickel that will be taken from the seniors
will go into the General Fund where it will be used to carry out this 7-
year plan, which includes a very large tax cut. So this is a plan to
take more from people on Medicare, three-quarters of whom live on less
than $24,000 a year, and put it into a tax cut, more than half of which
will go to Americans who plainly don't need it.
Now that has to be driven home. That is a fact. And it is a fact I
almost never hear discussed. This is not about saving the Trust Fund. If
we were really about to see the Trust Fund go broke and there were no
other options, we would all be saying, ``Let's get in a room and roll up
our sleeves and figure out what it is we have to do to save the best of
this program,'' wouldn't we? Every one of us would be; none of you would
be here raising sand about that. And you'd also want to say to the
hospitals, ``We want to keep you open,'' to the doctors, ``We want to
keep you going. We don't want to bankrupt anybody. Let's see how we can
have a fair plan of shared sacrifice.''
But by law, the money coming out of the seniors does not go to that
Trust Fund. And it is a grave disservice to the American people not to
just tell everybody that, not to say, ``Hey, we'd like to fix the Trust
Fund, and here's what the providers are going to have to sacrifice.''
Other Popular 1995 Presidential Documents Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |