| Home > 106th Congressional Bills > S. 3060 (is) To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong veterans. [Introduced in Senate] ...
S. 3060 (is) To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong veterans. [Introduced in Senate] ...
Calendar No. 161 106th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 305 [Report No. 106-83] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To reform unfair and anticompetitive practices in the professional boxing industry. _______________________________________________________________________ June 21, 1999 Reported with amendments Calendar No. 161 106th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 305 [Report No. 106-83] To reform unfair and anticompetitive practices in the professional boxing industry. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES January 25, 1999 Mr. McCain (for himself, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Abraham) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation June 21, 1999 Reported by Mr. Lott (for Mr. McCain) with amendments [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To reform unfair and anticompetitive practices in the professional boxing industry. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. The Congress makes the following findings: (1) Professional boxing differs from other major, interstate professional sports industries in the United States in that it operates without any private sector association, league, or centralized industry organization to establish uniform and appropriate business practices and ethical standards. This has led to repeated occurrences of disreputable and coercive business practices in the boxing industry, to the detriment of professional boxers nationwide. (2) Professional boxers are vulnerable to exploitative business practices engaged in by certain promoters and sanctioning bodies which dominate the sport. Boxers do not have an established representative group to advocate for their interests and rights in the industry. (3) State officials are the proper regulators of professional boxing events, and must protect the welfare of professional boxers and serve the public interest by closely supervising boxing activity in their jurisdiction. State boxing commissions do not currently receive adequate information to determine whether boxers competing in their jurisdiction are being subjected to contract terms and business practices which may be violative of State regulations, or are onerous and confiscatory. (4) Promoters who engage in illegal, coercive, or unethical business practices can take advantage of the lack of equitable business standards in the sport by holding boxing events in states with weaker regulatory oversight. (5) The sanctioning organizations which have proliferated in the boxing industry have not established credible and objective criteria to rate professional boxers, and operate with virtually no industry or public oversight. Their ratings are susceptible to manipulation, have deprived boxers of fair opportunities for advancement, and have undermined public confidence in the integrity of the sport. (6) Open competition in the professional boxing industry has been significantly interfered with by restrictive and anti- competitive business practices of certain promoters and sanctioning bodies, to the detriment of the athletes and the ticket-buying public. Common practices of promoters and sanctioning organizations represent restraints of interstate trade in the United States. (7) It is necessary and appropriate to establish national contracting reforms to protect professional boxers and prevent exploitative business practices, and to require enhanced financial disclosures to State athletic commissions to improve the public oversight of the sport. (8) Whereas the Congress seeks to improve the integrity and ensure fair practices of the professional boxing industry on a nationwide basis, it deems it appropriate to name this reform in honor of Muhammad Ali, whose career achievements and personal contributions to the sport, and positive impact on our society, are unsurpassed in the history of boxing. SEC. 3. PURPOSES. The purposes of this Act are-- (1) to protect the rights and welfare of professional boxers by preventing certain exploitative, oppressive, and unethical business practices they may be subject to on an interstate basis; (2) to assist State boxing commissions in their efforts to provide more effective public oversight of the sport; and (3) to promoting honorable competition in professional boxing and enhance the overall integrity of the industry. SEC 4. PROTECTING BOXERS FROM EXPLOITATION. The Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amended by-- (1) redesignating section 15 as 16; and (2) inserting after section 14 the following: ``SEC. 15. PROTECTION FROM EXPLOITATION. ``(a) Contract Requirements.-- ``(1) In general.--Any contract between a boxer and a promoter or manager shall-- ``(A) include mutual obligations between the parties; ``(B) specify a minimum number of professional boxing matches per year for the boxer; and ``(C) set forth a specific period of time during which the contract will be in effect, including any provision for extension of that period due to the boxer's temporary inability to compete because of an injury or other cause. ``(2) 1-year limit on coercive promotional rights.-- ``(A) The period of time for which promotional rights to promote a boxer may be granted under a contract between the boxer and a promoter, or between promoters with respect to a boxer, may not be greater than 12 months in length if the boxer is required to grant such rights, or a boxer's promoter is required to grant such rights with respect to a boxer, as a condition precedent to the boxer's participation in a professional boxing match against another boxer who is under contract to the promoter. ``(B) A promoter exercising promotional rights with respect to such boxer during the 12-month period beginning on the day after the last day of the promotional right period described in subparagraph (A) may not secure exclusive promotional rights from the boxer's opponents as a condition of participating in a professional boxing match against the boxer during that period, and any contract to the contrary-- ``(i) shall be considered to be in restraint of trade and contrary to public policy; and ``(ii) unenforceable. ``(C) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as pre-empting any State law concerning interference with contracts. ``(3) Promotional rights under mandatory bout contracts.-- Neither a promoter nor a sanctioning organization may require a boxer, in a contract arising from a professional boxing match that is a mandatory bout under the rules of the sanctioning organization, to grant promotional rights to any promoter for a future professional boxing match. ``(b) Employment As Condition of Promoting, Etc.--No person who is a licensee, manager, matchmaker, or promoter may require a boxer to employ, retain, or provide compensation to any individual or business enterprise (whether operating in corporate form or not) recommended or designated by that person as a condition of-- ``(1) such person's working with the boxer as a licensee, manager, matchmaker, or promoter; ``(2) such person's arranging for the boxer to participate in a professional boxing match; or ``(3) such boxer's participation in a professional boxing match. ``(c) Enforcement.-- ``(1) Promotion agreement.--A provision in a contract between a promoter and a boxer, or between promoters with respect to a boxer, that violates subsection (a) is contrary to public policy and unenforceable at law. ``(2) Employment agreement.--In any action brought against a boxer to recover money (whether as damages or as money owed) for acting as a licensee, manager, matchmaker, or promoter for the boxer, the court, arbitrator, or administrative body before which the action is brought may deny recovery in whole or in part under the contract as contrary to public policy if the employment, retention, or compensation that is the subject of the action was obtained in violation of subsection (b).''. (b) Conflicts of Interest.--Section 9 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 6308) is amended by-- (1) striking ``No member'' and inserting ``(a) Regulatory Personnel.--No member''; and (2) adding at the end thereof the following: ``(b) Firewall Between Promoters and Managers.-- ``(1) In general.--It is unlawful for-- <DELETED> ``(A) a promoter to have a direct or indirect financial interest in the management of a boxer; or</DELETED> <DELETED> ``(B) a manager--</DELETED> ``(A) a boxer's promoter (or a promoter who is required to be licensed under State law) to have a direct or indirect financial interest in that boxer's licensed manager or management company; or ``(B) a licensed manager or management company (or a manager or management company that, under State law, is required to be licensed)-- ``(i) to have a direct or indirect financial interest in the promotion of a boxer; or ``(ii) to be employed by or receive compensation or other benefits from a promoter, except for amounts received as consideration under the manager's contract with the boxer. ``(2) Exception for self-promotion and management.-- Paragraph (1) does not prohibit a boxer from acting as his own promoter or manager.''. SEC. 5. SANCTIONING ORGANIZATION INTEGRITY REFORMS. (a) In General.--The Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), as amended by section 4 of this Act, is amended by-- (1) redesignating section 16, as redesignated by section 4 of this Act, as section 17; and (2) by inserting after section 15 the following: ``SEC. 16. SANCTIONING ORGANIZATIONS. ``(a) Objective Criteria.--A sanctioning organization that sanctions professional boxing matches on an interstate basis shall establish objective and consistent written criteria for the ratings of professional boxers. ``(b) Appeals Process.--A sanctioning organization shall establish and publish an appeals procedure that affords a boxer rated by that organization a reasonable opportunity, without the payment of any fee, to submit information to contest its rating of the boxer. Under the procedure, the sanctioning organization shall, within 14 days after receiving a request from a boxer questioning that organization's rating of the boxer-- ``(1) provide to the boxer a written explanation of the organization's criteria, its rating of the boxer, and the rationale or basis for its rating (including any response to any specific questions submitted by the boxer); and ``(2) submit a copy of its explanation to the President of the Association of Boxing Commissions of the United States and to the boxing commission of the boxer's domiciliary State. ``(c) Notification of Change in Rating.--If a sanctioning organization changes its rating of a boxer who is included, before the change, in the top 10 boxers rated by that organization, or who, as a result of the change is included in the top 10 boxers rated by that organization, then, within 14 days after changing the boxer's rating, the organization shall-- ``(1) mail notice of the change and a written explanation of the reasons for its change in that boxer's rating to the boxer at the boxer's last known address; ``(2) post a copy, within the 14-day period, of the notice and the explanation on its Internet website or homepage, if any, for a period of not less than 30 days; and ``(3) mail a copy of the notice and the explanation to the President of the Association of Boxing Commissions. ``(d) Public Disclosure.-- ``(1) FTC filing.--Not later than January 31st of each year, a sanctioning organization shall submit to the Federal Trade Commission-- ``(A) a complete description of the organization's ratings criteria, policies, and general sanctioning fee schedule; ``(B) the bylaws of the organization; ``(C) the appeals procedure of the organization;
Other Popular 106th Congressional Bills Documents:
|GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information.|
Supreme Court Decisions
104th Congressional Documents
105th Congressional Documents
106th Congressional Documents
107th Congressional Documents
108th Congressional Documents
1994 Presidential Documents