Home > 105th Congressional Bills > S.Res. 19 (is) Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United States opposition to the prison sentence of Tibetan ethnomusicologist Ngawang Choephel by the Government of the People's Republic of China. ...S.Res. 19 (is) Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United States opposition to the prison sentence of Tibetan ethnomusicologist Ngawang Choephel by the Government of the People's Republic of China. ...
105th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 19
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United States opposition
to the prison sentence of Tibetan ethnomusicologist Ngawang Choephel by
the Government of the People's Republic of China.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 21, 1997
Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Helms, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Jeffords, Mr.
Dodd, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry,
Mr. Kohl, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Levin, Mr. Mack,
Mr. Wyden, Mr. Coats, Mr. Inouye, Mr. McCain, Mr. Reed, Mr. Bingaman,
Mr. Biden, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Dorgan) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign
Relations
March 4, 1997
Reported without amendment
March 11, 1997
Considered and agreed to
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United States opposition
to the prison sentence of Tibetan ethnomusicologist Ngawang Choephel by
the Government of the People's Republic of China.
Whereas the Chinese Government sentenced Ngawang Choephel to an 18 year prison
term plus 4 years subsequent deprivation of his political rights on
December 26, 1996, following a secret trial;
Whereas Mr. Choephel is a Tibetan national whose family fled Chinese oppression
to live in exile in India in 1968;
Whereas Mr. Choephel studied ethnomusicology at Middlebury College in Vermont as
a Fulbright Scholar, and at the Tibetan Institute of Performing Arts in
Dharamsala, India;
Whereas Mr. Choephel returned to Tibet in July 1995 to prepare a documentary
film about traditional Tibetan performing arts;
Whereas Mr. Choephel was detained in August 1995 by the Chinese authorities and
held incommunicado for over a year before the Government of the People's
Republic of China admitted to holding him, and finally charged him with
espionage in October 1996;
Whereas there is no evidence that Mr. Choephel's activities in Tibet involved
anything other than purely academic research;
Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of China denies Tibetans their
fundamental human rights, as reported in the State Department's Country
Reports on Human Rights Practices, and by human rights organizations
including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Asia;
Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of China is responsible for the
destruction of much of Tibetan civilization since its invasion of Tibet
in 1949;
Whereas the arrest of a Tibetan scholar, such as Mr. Choephel who worked to
preserve Tibetan culture, reflects the systematic attempt by the
Government of the People's Republic of China to repress cultural
expression in Tibet;
Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of China, through direct and
indirect incentives, has established discriminatory development programs
which have resulted in an overwhelming flow of Chinese immigrants into
Tibet, including those areas incorporated into the Chinese provinces of
Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, and Quinghai, and have excluded Tibetans from
participation in important policy decisions, which further threatens
traditional Tibetan life;
Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of China withholds meaningful
participation in the governance of Tibet from Tibetans and has failed to
abide by its own constitutional guarantee of autonomy for Tibetans;
Whereas the Dalai Lama of Tibet has stated his willingness to enter into
negotiations with the Chinese and has repeatedly accepted the framework
Deng Xiaoping proposed for such negotiations in 1979;
Whereas the United States Government has not developed an effective plan to win
support in international fora, such as the United Nations Commission on
Human Rights, to bring international pressure to bear on the Government
of the People's Republic of China to improve human rights and to
negotiate with the Dalai Lama;
Whereas the Chinese have displayed provocative disregard for American concerns
by arresting and sentencing prominent dissidents around the time that
senior United States Government officials have visited China; and
Whereas United States Government policy seeks to foster negotiations between the
Government of the People's Republic of China and the Dalai Lama, and
presses China to respect Tibet's unique religious, linguistic, and
cultural traditions: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) Ngawang Choephel and other prisoners of conscience in
Tibet, as well as in China, should be released immediately and
unconditionally;
(2) to underscore the gravity of this matter, in all
official meetings with representatives of the Government of the
People's Republic of China, United States officials should
request Mr. Choephel's immediate and unconditional release;
(3) the United States Government should take prompt action
to sponsor and promote a resolution at the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights regarding China and Tibet which
specifically addresses political prisoners and negotiations
with the Dalai Lama;
(4) an exchange program should be established in honor of
Ngawang Choephel, involving students of the Tibetan Institute
of Performing Arts and appropriate educational institutions in
the United States; and,
(5) the United States Government should seek access for
internationally recognized human rights groups to monitor human
rights in Tibet.
<all>
Pages: 1 Other Popular 105th Congressional Bills Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |