Home > 104th Congressional Documents > T.Doc.104-19 INVESTMENT TREATY WITH ALBANIA ...

T.Doc.104-19 INVESTMENT TREATY WITH ALBANIA ...


Google
 
Web GovRecords.org





   104th Congress 1st            SENATE              Treaty Doc.
         Session
                                                        104-18
_______________________________________________________________________



 
TREATY WITH THE PHILIPPINES ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

 THE TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND 
   THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ON MUTUAL LEGAL 
 ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS, SIGNED AT MANILA ON NOVEMBER 13, 1994

<GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>


 September 5, 1995.--Treaty was read the first time and, together with 
the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 
          and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate
                         LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

                              ----------                              

                                The White House, September 5, 1995.
To the Senate of the United States:
    With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the 
Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between 
the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of the Republic of the Philippines on Mutual Legal 
Assistance in Criminal Matters, signed at Manila on November 
13, 1994. I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, 
the report to the Department of State with respect to the 
Treaty.
    The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal 
assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in 
order to counter criminal activity more effectively. The Treaty 
will enhance our ability to investigate and prosecute a wide 
variety of crimes, including drug trafficking and terrorism 
offenses. The Treaty is self-executing.
    The Treaty provides for a broad range of cooperation in 
criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty 
includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; 
providing documents, records, and items of evidence; serving 
documents; locating or identifying persons or items; 
transferring persons in custody for testimony or other 
purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; 
assisting in proceedings related to forfeiture of assets, 
restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of 
assistance not prohibited by the laws of the Requested States.
    I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable 
consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to 
ratification.

                                                William J. Clinton.
                          LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

                              ----------                              

                                       Department of State,
                                        Washington, August 2, 1995.
The President,
The White House.
    I have the honor to submit to you the Treaty Between the 
Government of the United States of America and the Government 
of the Republic of the Philippines on Mutual Legal Assistance 
in Criminal Matters (the ``Treaty''), signed at Manila on 
November 13, 1994. I recommend that the Treaty be transmitted 
to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification.
    The Treaty covers mutual legal assistance in criminal 
matters. In recent years, similar bilateral treaties have 
entered into force with Argentina, the Bahamas, Canada, Italy, 
Jamaica, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, 
Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom (concerning the Cayman 
Islands), and Uruguay. Other similar treaties with Belgium, 
Colombia, and Panama have been signed by the United States and 
have received Senate advice and consent (but have not yet 
entered into force). In addition, treaties with the United 
Kingdom, South Korea, and Nigeria have been transmitted to the 
Senate, where they await Senate consideration. The Treaty with 
the Philippines contains many provisions similar to those in 
other recent treaties. It will enhance our ability to 
investigate and prosecute a variety of offenses, including drug 
trafficking and terrorism offenses of particular interest to 
the U.S. law enforcement community. The Treaty is designed to 
be self-executing and will not require implementing 
legislation.
    Article 1 sets forth a non-exhaustive list of the major 
types of assistance provided under the Treaty, including taking 
the testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, 
records and items of evidence; serving documents; locating or 
identifying persons or items; transferring persons in custody 
for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for 
searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to 
forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and 
rendering any other form of assistance not prohibited by the 
laws of the Requested State. The scope of the Treaty includes 
not only criminal offenses, but also proceedings related to 
criminal matters, which may be civil or administrative in 
nature.
    Article 1 states that assistance shall be provided without 
regard to whether the conduct involved would constitute an 
offense under the laws of the Requested State. This paragraph 
is important because United States and Philippine criminal law 
differ significantly and a requirement of dual criminality 
(which is a standard aspect of extradition treaties but which 
we prefer not to include in mutual legal assistance treaties) 
would have limited the areas in which assistance is available.
    Article 1 states explicitly that it is not intended to 
create rights in private parties to obtain, suppress, or 
exclude any evidence, or to impede the execution of a request.
    Article 2 provides for the establishment of Central 
Authorities and defines Central Authorities for purposes of the 
Treaty. For the United States, Central Authority is the 
Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney 
General. For the Republic of the Philippines, the Central 
Authority is the Secretary of Justice or a person designated by 
the Secretary of Justice. The article provides that the Central 
Authorities shall communicate directly with one another, or 
through diplomatic channels, for the purposes of the Treaty.
    Article 3 sets forth the limited circumstances under which 
a Requested State's Central Authority may deny assistance under 
the Treaty. A request may be denied if it relates to a 
political offense or to a military offense that would not be a 
crime under ordinary criminal law. In addition, a request may 
be denied if its execution would prejudice the security or 
similar essential interests of the Requested State, or if it is 
not made in conformity with the Treaty.
    Before denying assistance under Article 3, the Central 
Authority of the Requested State is required to consult with 
its counterpart in the Requesting State to consider whether 
assistance can be given subject to such conditions as it deems 
necessary. If the Requesting State accepts assistance subject 
to these conditions, it is required to comply with the 
conditions. If the Central Authority of the Requested State 
denies assistance, it is required to inform the Central 
Authority of the Requesting State of the reasons for the 
denial.
    Article 4 prescribes the form and content of written 
requests under the Treaty, specifying in detail the information 
required in each request. The article permits other forms of 
request in emergency situations but requires written 
confirmation within ten days thereafter unless the Central 
Authority of the Requested State agrees otherwise. All requests 
and supporting documents are to be submitted in English unless 
otherwise agreed.
    Article 5 requires the Central Authority of the Requested 
State to execute the request promptly or to transmit it to the 
authority having jurisdiction to do so. It provides that the 
competent authorities of the Requested State shall do 
everything in their power to execute a request, and that courts 
or other competent authorities of the Requested State shall 
have authority to issue subpoenas or other orders necessary to 
execute the request. The Central Authority of the Requested 
State must make all arrangements for and meet the costs of 
representation of the Requesting State in any proceedings 
arising out of an assistance request.
    Requests are to be executed in accordance with the laws of 
the Requested State except to the extent that the Treaty 
provides otherwise. However, the method of execution specified 
in the request is to be followed except insofar as it is 
prohibited by the laws of the Requested State. If the Central 
Authority of the Requested State determines that execution of 
the request would interfere with an ongoing investigation, 
prosecution, or proceeding, it may postpone execution or, after 
consulting with the Central Authority of the Requesting State, 
impose conditions on execution. If the Requesting State accepts 
assistance subject to conditions, it shall comply with them.
    Article 5 further requires the Requested State, if asked to 
do so, to use its best efforts to keep confidential a request 
and its contents, and to inform the Requesting State's Central 
Authority if the request cannot be executed without breaching 
confidentiality. This provides the Requesting State an 
opportunity to decide whether to pursue the request or to 
withdraw it in order to maintain confidentiality.
    The article requires the Requested State's Central 
Authority to respond to reasonable inquiries by the Requesting 
State's Central Authority regarding the status of the execution 
of a particular request; to report promptly to the Requesting 
State's Central Authority the outcome of its execution; and, if 
the request is denied, to inform the Requesting State's Central 
Authority in writing of the reasons for the denial.
    Article 6 apportions between the two States the costs 
incurred in executing a request. It provides that the Requested 
State shall pay all costs, except for the following items to be 
paid by the Requesting State: fees of expert witnesses, costs 
of translation, interpretation, and transcription, and 
allowances and expenses related to travel of persons pursuant 
to Articles 10 and 11.
    Article 7 requires the Requesting State to comply with any 
request by the Central Authority of the Requested State that 
information or evidence obtained under the Treaty not be used 
for proceedings other than those described in the request 
without its prior consent. Further, if the Requested State's 
Central Authority asks that information or evidence furnished 
be kept confidential or be used in accordance with specified 
conditions, the Requesting State must use its best efforts to 
comply with the conditions. Once information is made public in 
the Requesting State in accordance with either of these 
provisions, no further limitations on use apply. Nothing in the 
article prevents the use or disclosure of information to the 
extent that there is an obligation to do so under the 
Constitution of the Requesting State in a criminal prosecution. 
The Requesting State is obliged to notify the Requested State 
in advance of any such proposed use or disclosure.
    Article 8 provides that a person in the Requested State 
from whom evidence is requested pursuant to the Treaty shall be 
compelled, if necessary, to appear and testify or produce 
evidence. The article requires the Central Authority of the 
Requested State, upon request, to furnish information in 
advance about the date and place of the taking of testimony or 
evidence.
    Article 8 requires the Requested State to permit the 
presence of persons specified in the request (such as the 
accused, counsel for the accused, or other interested persons) 
and, to the extent allowed by its laws, to permit them to 
question the person giving the testimony or evidence. In the 
event that a person whose testimony or evidence is being taken 
asserts a claim of immunity, incapacity, or privilege under the 
laws of the Requesting State, Article 8 provides that the 
testimony or evidence shall be taken and the claim made known 
to the Central Authority of the Requesting State for resolution 
by its authorities.
    Finally, in order to ensure admissibility in evidence in 
the Requesting State, Article 8 provides a mechanism for 
authenticating evidence that is produced pursuant to or that is 
the subject of testimony taken in the Requested State.
    Article 9 requires that the Requested State provide the 
Requesting State with copies of publicly available records in 
the possession of government departments or agencies. The 
Requested State may further provide copies of records or 
information in the possession of a government department or 
agency, but not publicly available, to the extent and under the 
same conditions as it would provide them to its own law 
enforcement or judicial authorities. The Requested State has 
the discretion to deny such requests entirely or in part. 
Article 9 also provides that no further authentication shall be 
necessary for admissibility into evidence in the Requesting 
State of official records where the official in charge of 
maintaining them authenticates the records through the use of 
Form B appended to this Treaty.
    Article 10 provides a mechanism for the Requesting State to 
invite the voluntary appearance in its territory of a person 
located in the Requested State. The Requesting State shall 
indicate the extent to which the expenses will be paid.
    The Central Authority of the Requesting State has 
discretion to determine that a person appearing in the 
Requesting State shall not be subject to service of process or 
be detained or subjected to any restriction of personal liberty 
by reason of any acts or convictions that preceded his 
departure from the Requested State. Any safe conduct provided 
for by this article ceases seven days after the Central 
Authority of the Requesting State has notified the Central 
Authority of the Requested State that the person's presence is 
no longer required, or if the person has left the Requesting 
State and voluntarily returned to it. An extension of up to 
fifteen days for good cause may be granted by the Requesting 
State's Central Authority in its discretion.
    Article 11 provides for transfer of a person in custody in 
the Requested State to the Requesting State for purposes of 
assistance under the Treaty (for example, a witness 
incarcerated in the Requested State may be transferred to the 
Requesting State to have his deposition taken in the presence 
of the defendant), provided that the person in question and the 
Central Authority of the Requested State agree. The article 
also provides for voluntary transfer of a person in the custody 
of the Requesting State to the Requested State for purposes of 
assistance under the Treaty (for example, a defendant in the 
Requesting State may be transferred for purposes of attending a 
witness deposition in the Requested State), if the person 
consents and if the Central Authorities of both States agree.
    Article 11 establishes both the express authority and the 
obligation of the receiving State to maintain the person 
transferred in custody unless otherwise authorized by the 
sending State. The return of the person transferred is subject 
to terms and conditions agreed to by the Central Authorities, 
and the sending State is not required to initiate extradition 
proceedings for return of the person transferred. The person 
transferred receives credit for time served in the custody of 
the receiving State.
    Article 12 requires the Requested State to use its best 
efforts to ascertain the location or identity of persons or 
items specified in a request.
    Article 13 obligates the Requested State to use its best 
efforts to effect service of any document relating, in whole or 
in part, to a request under the Treaty. A request for the 

Pages: 1 2 Next >>

Other Popular 104th Congressional Documents Documents:

1 H.Doc.104-35 H.R. 872 ...
2 S.Doc.104-2 AUTHORITY AND RULES OF SENATE COMMITTEES, 1995-96 ...
3 H.Doc.104-198 VETO OF H.R. 1833 ...
4 H.Doc.104-34 ``MIDDLE-CLASS BILL OF RIGHTS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 1995'' ...
5 H.Doc.104-33 PROPOSED LEGISLATION: ``WORKING WAGE INCREASE ACT OF 1995'' ...
6 H.Doc.104-260 REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT'S EIGHTH SPECIAL IMPOUNDMENT MESSAGE FOR ...
7 H.Doc.104-150 VETO OF H.R. 1058 ...
8 H.Doc.104-228 THE 1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FEDERAL OLD-AGE ...
9 H.Doc.104-227 THE 1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FEDERAL ...
10 H.Doc.104-118 DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO ANGOLA ...
11 H.Doc.104-229 BUDGET AUTHORITY TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY ...
12 H.Doc.104-178 REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ...
13 H.Doc.104-168 STATE OF THE UNION MESSAGE ...
14 H.Doc.104-226 THE 1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FEDERAL ...
15 H.Doc.104-203 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE ...
16 H.Doc.104-171 MAKING AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS ...
17 H.Doc.104-116 TOTAL INDEPENDENCE OF ANGOLA (``UNITA'') ...
18 T.Doc.104-17 CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF PLANTS ...
19 H.Doc.104-108 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ...
20 H.Doc.104-72 PROPOSED LEGISLATION: ``THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1995'' ...
21 H.Doc.104-157 CONTINUATION OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO LIBYA ...
22 H.Doc.104-102 MAKING AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS ...
23 H.Doc.104-252 CUMULATIVE REPORT ON RESCISSIONS AND DEFERRALS, AUGUST 1, 1996 ...
24 H.Doc.104-65 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ...
25 H.Doc.104-197 VETO OF H.R. 1561 ...
26 H.Doc.104-194 REQUEST TO MAKE AVAILABLE APPROPRIATIONS ...
27 H.Doc.104-50 UPDATE OF EVENTS IN HAITI (OPERATION ``UPHOLD DEMOCRACY'') ...
28 S.Doc.104-12 SENATE ELECTION LAW GUIDEBOOK 1996 ...
29 T.Doc.104-35 INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON SERVING CRIMINAL SENTENCES ABROAD ...
30 T.Doc.104-1 TREATY WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN ...


Other Documents:

104th Congressional Documents Records and Documents

GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information.
House Rules:

104th House Rules
105th House Rules
106th House Rules

Congressional Bills:

104th Congressional Bills
105th Congressional Bills
106th Congressional Bills
107th Congressional Bills
108th Congressional Bills

Supreme Court Decisions

Supreme Court Decisions

Additional

1995 Privacy Act Documents
1997 Privacy Act Documents
1994 Unified Agenda
2004 Unified Agenda

Congressional Documents:

104th Congressional Documents
105th Congressional Documents
106th Congressional Documents
107th Congressional Documents
108th Congressional Documents

Congressional Directory:

105th Congressional Directory
106th Congressional Directory
107th Congressional Directory
108th Congressional Directory

Public Laws:

104th Congressional Public Laws
105th Congressional Public Laws
106th Congressional Public Laws
107th Congressional Public Laws
108th Congressional Public Laws

Presidential Records

1994 Presidential Documents
1995 Presidential Documents
1996 Presidential Documents
1997 Presidential Documents
1998 Presidential Documents
1999 Presidential Documents
2000 Presidential Documents
2001 Presidential Documents
2002 Presidential Documents
2003 Presidential Documents
2004 Presidential Documents

Home Executive Judicial Legislative Additional Reference About Privacy