| Home > 105th Congressional Documents > T.Doc.105-18 EXTRADITION TREATY WITH ARGENTINA ...
T.Doc.105-18 EXTRADITION TREATY WITH ARGENTINA ...
105th Congress Treaty Doc. SENATE 1st Session 105-17 _______________________________________________________________________ WIPO COPYRIGHT TREATY (WCT) (1996) AND WIPO PERFORMANCES AND PHONOGRAMS TREATY (WPPT) (1996) __________ MESSAGE from THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES transmitting WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION COPYRIGHT TREATY AND THE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCES AND PHONOGRAMS TREATY, DONE AT GENEVA ON DECEMBER 20, 1996, AND SIGNED BY THE UNITED STATES ON APRIL 12, 1997 <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> July 28, 1997.--Treaty was read the first time and, together with the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ---------- The White House, July 28, 1997. To the Senate of the United States: I transmit herewith for Senate advice and consent to ratification the World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty and the World Intellectual Property Organization Performances and Phonograms Treaty, done at Geneva on December 20, 1996, and signed by the United States on April 12, 1997. Also transmitted is the report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaties. These Treaties are in the best interests of the United States. They ensure that international copyright rules will keep pace with technological change, thus affording important protection against piracy for U.S. rightsholders in the areas of music, film, computer software, and information products. The terms of the Treaties are thus consistent with the United States policy of encouraging other countries to provide adequate and effective intellectual property protection. Legislation is required to implement certain provisions of the Treaties. Legislation is also required to ensure that parties to the Treaties are granted, under U.S. copyright law, the rights to which they are entitled under the Treaties. That legislation is being prepared and is expected to be submitted shortly. I recommend, therefore, that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, and give its advice and consent to ratification, subject to a declaration under Article 15(3) of the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty described in the accompanying State Department report. William J. Clinton. LETTER OF SUBMITTAL ---------- Department of State, Washington, July 22, 1997. The President, The White House. The President: I have the honor to submit to you, with a view to their transmission to the Senate for advice and consent to ratification, the World Intellectual Property Organization (``WIPO'') Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, both done at Geneva on December 20, 1996 (hereinafter, ``the Treaties''). These Treaties were adopted under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization to strengthen international standards for the protection of copyright. Each of the Treaties contains provisions that are the same as provisions in the other Treaty, as well as provisions specific to its own subject matter. Provisions common to the treaties The Treaties respond to the challenges of protecting works in the realm of digital technology. In that regard both Treaties oblige parties to ensure that rightsholders have the exclusive right to control on-demand transmissions of works to members of the public (Article 8, Copyright Treaty; Article 14, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). Both Treaties oblige parties to provide adequate legal protection against the circumvention of technologically based security measures, and to apply appropriate and effective remedies against protection- defeating devices or services (Article 11, Copyright Treaty; Article 18, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). Both require the provision of effective remedies against the knowing removal or alteration of electronic rights-management information without authority, and against the related acts of distribution, importation for distribution and communication to the public with knowledge that such information has been removed or altered (Article 12, Copyright Treaty; Article 19, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). Both Treaties oblige parties to adopt the measures necessary to ensure the application of the Treaties and to ensure that enforcement procedures are available under the parties' laws so as to permit effective action against any act of infringement of rights covered by the Treaties, including provision of expeditious remedies to prevent infringements and remedies which constitute a deterrent to further infringements (Article 14, Copyright Treaty; Article 23, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). In addition to these substantive obligations, each Treaty provides that not only WIPO member States, but also the European Community, as well as similar intergovernmental organizations, may become party to the Treaty. Admission of intergovernmental organizations other than the European Community will be subject to a decision by an Assembly created to administer each Treaty. To be eligible, such an organization must declare that it is competent in respect of, and have its own legislation binding on all its member States on, matters covered by the Treaty (Article 17, Copyright Treaty; Article 26, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). Each party that is a State has a vote in the Assembly; intergovernmental organizations do not have an independent vote. However, an intergovernmental organization is permitted to participate in a vote on behalf of its memberStates that are party to the Treaty. There is no allowance for ``split voting''; either an organization votes on behalf of all member State parties, or each member State party votes individually (Article 15(3), Copyright Treaty; Article 24(3), Performances and Phonograms Treaty). In order to ensure that a party to one of the Treaties has recourse in the event of a dispute or non-compliance with treaty obligations by a party that is an intergovernmental organization or a member state of such an organization, each Treaty provides that each contracting party bears all the obligations under the treaty (Article 18, Copyright Treaty; Article 27, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). Each Treaty enters into force three months after thirty instruments of ratification or accession by states have been deposited with the Director General of WIPO. This number makes it impossible for the European Community and its Member States to be in a position to control the Assembly (Article 20, Copyright Treaty; Article 29, Performances and Phonograms Treaty). WIPO Copyright Treaty The WIPO Copyright Treaty provides in Article 1 that it is a special agreement within the meaning of Article 20 of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, revised at Paris, July 24, 1971, as amended (the ``Berne Convention''), to which the United States is a party (Article 1). Article 20 of the Berne Convention provides that the states party to the Berne Convention reserve the right to enter into special agreements among themselves insofar as the special agreements grant to authors more extensive rights than those granted under the Berne Convention. The Copyright Treaty (Article 1(4)) requires that parties comply with the substantive obligations (Articles 1-21 and the Appendix) of the Berne Convention. Like the Berne Convention, the Copyright Treaty provides (Article 3) that parties may not impose formalities on the nationals of other parties as a condition for claiming protection under the Treaty. In Articles 4 and 5, the Copyright Treaty clarifies, along the lines of Article 10 of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights done at Marrakesh, April 15, 1994, (``TRIPS Agreement''), that computer programs are protected as literary works under the Berne Convention, and that original compilations of data (databases) that incorporate copyrightable authorship are also protected. The Copyright Treaty (Article 6) explicitly recognizes a right of distribution for all categories of works (which, under the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement is granted explicitly only for cinematographic works). As does the TRIPS Agreement, the Copyright Treaty (Article 7) provides for an exclusive post-first-sale right of rental for computer programs, cinematographic works and works embodied in phonograms; parties need not implement the rental right in respect of computer programs where the program itself is not the object of rental, and in the case of cinematographic works where rental does not lead to widespread copying impairing the right of reproduction. The Copyright Treaty (Article 8) extends to all categories of works the right of communication to the public (which under the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement is required only to a varying extent for different categories of works), and clarifies that thisright covers making works available to the public by wire or wireless means, through an interactive, on-demand transmission. The Copyright Treaty (Article 9) extends the term of protection of photographic works to 50 years after the death of the author, as is already the case for all other categories of literary works. It does so by stating that parties shall not apply to provisions of Article 7(4) of the Berne Convention, which allows parties to limit the term of protection for such works to a minimum term of twenty-five years from the making of the work. The Copyright Treaty (Article 10) extends the application of the three-step test for exceptions established for the right of reproduction in Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention to all other rights (as in Article 13 of the TRIPS Agreement): limitations or exceptions to all rights may be made in certain special cases that do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the author. The Copyright Treaty (Article 22) does not allow any reservations to the obligations it sets forth. WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty Several important provisions of the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty offer responses to the challenges of digital technology for performances and phonograms in digital form in the Internet and similar electronic networks. The relevant definitions (phonogram, fixation, producer of a phonogram, publication, broadcasting, communication to the public) are broad enough to cover the requirements of digital technology (Article 2). ``Moral rights'' are provided under Article 5 for performers in respect of their live aural performances or performances fixed in phonograms (although these rights cover many kinds of modifications, they may be particularly relevant in the case of digital manipulations of performances fixed in phonograms). In Articles 10 and 14, this Treaty provides an exclusive right for both performers and producers of phonograms to authorize making available their fixed performances and phonograms, respectively, by wire or wireless means, in an interactive, on-demand manner. the Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Article 4) obliges parties to grant national treatment in respect of the rights provided in the Treaty to nationals of other parties, except to the extent that another party makes use of reservations permitted under Article 15(3) of the Treaty. It also requires that protection not be subject to any formalities. Other important provisions of the Treaty are described below. Also noted are differences and similarities with the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations done at Rome, October 26, 1961 (``Rome Convention''), to which the United States is not a party, and the TRIPS Agreement. The Performances and Phonograms Treaty has no direct relationship to the Rome Convention. It includes some of the provisions of the Convention by reference (the provisions on criteria of eligibility for protection and on the possibility to apply reciprocity in respect of the right to remuneration for broadcasting and communication to the public), but there is no obligation to apply the other provisions of the Rome Convention. There is no legal relationship between the Treaty and the TRIPS Agreement. Article 6 of the Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Article 6) provides for the exclusive rights ofperformers to authorize the broadcasting and communication to the public of their unfixed performances, except where the performance is already a broadcast program, and the fixation of their unfixed performances (this generally corresponds to the standards in the Rome Convention and the TRIPS Agreement). This Treaty (Articles 7 and 11) also includes an exclusive right of reproduction for performers in respect of their fixed performances and for producers of phonograms (in harmony with the Rome Convention and the TRIPS Agreement). The Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Articles 8 and 12) provides recognition of a right of distribution (on which there is no provision in the Rome Convention or the TRIPS Agreement) for both performers and producers of phonograms. The Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Articles 9 and 13) includes an exclusive post-first-sale right of rental for both performers and producers of phonograms; such a right is not granted in the Rome Convention, but is granted in the TRIPS Agreement explicitly for producers of phonograms and left to national legislation as far as performers are concerned. The Performances and Phonograms Treaty, furthermore, allows those countries where a system of equitable remuneration was applied on April 15, 1994, to maintain such a system, rather than provide an exclusive right (such a ``grandfathering'' clause is also included in the TRIPS Agreement). The Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Article 15(1)) includes the right to a single equitable remuneration for performers and producers of phonograms for the broadcasting and communication to the public of phonograms published for commercial purposes or reproductions of such phonograms. Such a right is provided in the Rome Convention, but not in the TRIPS Agreement. Article 15(2) allows parties to establish in national legislation that the remuneration shall be claimed from the user by the performer or the producer of a phonogram, or both. Article 15(3) permits any party to declare, in a notification to the Director General of WIPO, that it will apply the provisions of Article 15(1) only in respect of certain uses or will otherwise limit their application or that
Other Popular 105th Congressional Documents Documents:
|GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information.|
Supreme Court Decisions
104th Congressional Documents
105th Congressional Documents
106th Congressional Documents
107th Congressional Documents
108th Congressional Documents
1994 Presidential Documents