Home > 1994 Unified Agenda > ua14no94 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)...ua14no94 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)...
<DOC>
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS)
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
This statement of regulatory priorities is in two parts. Part I
describes the overall regulatory priorities of the Department. Part II
describes these priorities by agency, in greater detail.
I. Overall Priorities
The Department of Health and Human Services, the ``People's
Department,'' provides direct services or assistance to one of every
five Americans. With emphasis on children, the elderly, disabled
persons, the poor and others who are most vulnerable, HHS is the
Federal Government's principal agency for protecting health and
providing essential human services to Americans. HHS activities are
striking in their variety, ranging from the largest programs in
Government (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) to some of the
smallest. HHS responsibilities encompass a wide spectrum including
improving infant health; providing care for the elderly; gathering
basic national health and welfare statistics; providing job training,
health clinics, and Head Start services; conducting health research at
the National Institutes of Health; and regulating food and drug
products that account for some 25 cents of every dollar spent by
American consumers.
The Department's regulatory priorities reflect our broad strategic
goals. These key goals include:
<bullet> Transforming the welfare system in this country from a system
of dependency to a system of transition to work;
<bullet> Improving and protecting the health of our citizens,
especially the Nation's most vulnerable populations;
<bullet>Investing in the future of our Nation's children and youth;
<bullet> Increasing the independence and self-sufficiency of the
elderly and persons with disabilities; and
<bullet> Improving the management of our programs and delivery of
services to our customers.
Many of our significant regulatory initiatives address one or more of
these Department-wide goals. For example, new Head Start regulations
will not only strengthen the existing program as an investment in our
nation's children, but will also implement the new component for
infants and toddlers through performance standards.
Because of the importance of HHS's regulatory responsibilities, we are
emphasizing the principles of Executive Order 12866 which include
regulating only where required by statute or to meet a compelling
public need, fully considering the costs and benefits of regulatory
alternatives, increasing consultation with affected publics, and
reducing regulatory burden.
HHS is committed to substantial reforms of our existing regulations to
reduce burden on those we regulate while effectively meeting the health
and human services responsibilities of this Department. To focus our
efforts on those items in most need of revisions, we have asked the
public for recommendations through a request published in the Federal
Register on January 20, 1994. We continue to seek recommendations from
the public.
Early consultation with those parties affected by rulemaking is
critical to developing workable regulations. HHS will use a number of
innovative approaches as we work on developing the most effective
strategies for consultation with State and local governments and the
wide variety of other groups and individuals affected by regulations
issued by this Department. One approach that we plan to use for the
first time in the upcoming year is negotiated rulemaking. This process
will bring HHS together with external interests who would be
significantly affected by a new rule to reach consensus through open
discussions on some or all issues under consideration before a rule is
formally published as a notice of proposed rulemaking.
HHS is taking a new approach to our relationship with State, local, and
tribal governments. We are listening to officials of other levels of
government concerned about the imposition of unfunded mandates and
other significant changes on the way they must operate. Pursuant to
Executive Order 12875, ``Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership,''
HHS is committed to avoiding where possible imposition of mandates--
funded, and particularly unfunded--and to consulting with appropriate
levels of government as early as possible in the development of
policies and regulations affecting them.
We are carrying out our decisionmaking and consultation with a full
appreciation of State, local, and tribal governments as our partners in
serving the public. One example of our efforts is the Medicaid
regulation on home and community-based care which was published in July
1994. We worked closely with States to craft less burdensome waiver
requirements that will give States an opportunity to improve and expand
these essential community-based services to provide home care for more
individuals and to avoid unnecessary placement in nursing homes or
other health care institutions.
There are additional samples of regulations meeting both HHS strategic
goals and E.O. 12866 objectives. Under the Mammography Quality
standards Act, the Food and Drug Administration is implementing a major
initiative to upgrade the quality of mammography services. Higher
quality services will help increase the number of women whose cancers
are detected early and contribute directly to improving the health of
women. Other PHS agencies are working on selected regulations that will
also contribute to improving the Nation's health, such as regulations
related to State enforcement of laws against selling tobacco products
to minors.
Reengineering the Social Security Administration's disability insurance
claims process will enable us to dramatically reduce serious backlogs
and provide better service. The current process and procedures have not
changed significantly since the 1950's. Proposed changes would affect
types and locations of personnel in State agencies that serve as agents
for the program, and adjudicative standards.
The Health Care Financing Administration is reviewing existing Medicare
and Medicaid quality standards, known as ``conditions of
participation,'' for health care facilities such as hospitals, home
health agencies, and dialysis facilities to identify opportunities to
reform these standards to emphasize performance, to make them more
customer-centered, and to reduce burden on regulated entities. A number
of other regulations to simplify management of HCFA programs and
increase program integrity guarantees are also under development.
As a final example of the relationship of our regulatory initiatives to
these goals, just this spring our new food labeling standards became
effective, providing the American consumer with clear, useable, and
understandable nutrition information. This empowers the consumer with
the information needed to improve diet and health, and thus reduces his
or her risk of certain diseases, including heart disease and cancer.
II. Agency Plans
Virtually all HHS regulations are issued by a handful of agencies
within the Department. Descriptions of priorities for these are as
follows.
Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA)
HCFA is striving to reduce unnecessary burdens that the Medicare and
Medicaid programs have imposed on beneficiary populations, all levels
of government, and the medical provider community. HCFA is also
extending flexibility to the States where it will foster improved and
less burdensome operations and facilitate State reform activities.
In order to provide the most responsive and effective services
possible, HCFA is conducting rulemakings in an open manner, consulting
with and obtaining early and continuous input from the various levels
of government, as well as representatives of advocacy and provider
organizations. HCFA is working with State and local governments through
a continuous and ongoing consultation process in the development of
Medicaid regulations. For example, regularly scheduled meetings are
held with technical advisory groups that include HCFA and State
Medicaid representatives. Regular meetings and consultations are also
held by the ``Camden Yards Group'' that includes representation from
the State Medicaid Directors' Association, the American Public Welfare
Association, the National Governors' Association, and the Conference of
State Legislators. Under this cooperative structure, HCFA can ensure
maximum flexibility to State Medicaid programs.
Each major Medicaid regulation is being developed with extensive
involvement from this representative structure to assure effectiveness
and economy. Examples include: a proposed rule to clarify for States
the process for making ``findings'' concerning the payment for
inpatient hospital and long-term care facility services; a notice that
will facilitate implementation of the Department's childhood
immunization program; a rule that will make good on the President's
commitment to the National Governors' Association to simplify the home
and community-based services waiver process; and, a rule that will
ensure the effective delivery of services under the early periodic
screening, diagnostic, and treatment (known as EPSDT) program. These
reforms will contribute to improving access and meeting the health
needs of children, particularly disadvantaged and minority children.
In accordance with the combined themes of reducing unnecessary burden,
improving quality of care, and involving input from a full range of
interests, HCFA is developing improved Medicare regulations that will
govern conditions of participation for home health agencies and
hospitals, and conditions of coverage for the payment of end-stage
renal disease. Existing regulations in these areas are unnecessarily
burdensome, outdated, and process oriented. They will be replaced with
more universally applicable provisions that are patient/outcome
oriented and driven by meaningful data to better ensure healthy
outcomes for aged patients and those with disabilities. In developing
these regulations, HCFA has met, and is continuing to meet, with a
variety of provider and consumer representatives.
HCFA is also developing quality assurance regulations for nursing
homes. The agency is considering an enforcement regulation that will
use patient health status measures as benchmarks for determining
whether nursing facilities are in compliance with Medicare and Medicaid
participation requirements. For example, where deficiencies that do not
harm people are involved, the focus will be on corrective measures.
Conversely, for health and safety violations involving potential or
actual harm to residents/patients, punitive measures can be expected,
such as denial of payment, civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from
the Medicare/Medicaid programs. By establishing enforcement remedies
that realistically relate to the effects on patient health and safety,
the rule will encourage facilities to achieve the highest level of
health for the aged and disabled patients in these facilities.
In the area of fiscal responsibility, regulations are being developed
to implement the statutory prohibition against patient referrals by
physicians to health service entities (e.g., clinical laboratories,
home health agencies, physical therapists, etc.) with which the
physician has a financial interest or relationship. These regulations
are significant because they address the concern that such referral
relationships involve a potential for conflict of interest resulting in
unnecessary services for Medicare patients and unnecessary costs to the
Medicare program.
Several of HCFA's reform efforts are particularly supportive of the
President's directive (in Executive Order 12866) to take burden-
reducing regulatory actions, and the Secretary's goal of significantly
improving HHS management and customer service. Indeed, our efforts are
already bearing fruit. For example, in March 1994 HCFA published a
regulation that replaced the requirement for physicians to provide
hospitals annually with a signed acknowledgement concerning penalties
for misrepresenting certain information with a one-time signing
requirement at the time a physician is initially granted hospital
admitting privileges. One major medical association characterized this
change as one that will alleviate the ``hassle factor'' for physicians
and an important step toward restoring mutual trust between the Federal
Government and the medical profession.
Public Health Service (PHS) Including the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)
The PHS agencies (which, other than the Food and Drug Administration,
have minimal regulatory responsibilities) are working on selected
regulatory initiatives that improve individual program areas and
support the Secretary's goals. These include regulations on organ
procurement, State enforcement of laws against selling tobacco products
to minors, reducing potential conflicts of interest in biomedical
research, improving respirators used in the workplace, and increasing
tribal government responsibilities for managing health care programs.
Through the Food and Drug Administration, HHS has undertaken a number
of new regulatory initiatives to speed the development of new drugs to
treat serious diseases, particularly the development of drugs to treat
and prevent HIV infection, one of the nation's highest health
priorities. In support of this goal, FDA funds the National Task Force
on AIDS Drug Development, which was established by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services, and provides further support in terms of
agency expertise in science and medical ethics. FDA has also acted to
encourage labeling of prescription drugs for AIDS and other serious
illnesses with dosing information for pediatric use, so that these
therapies can be readily used to treat children.
Empowerment of the individual to participate in his or her own health
care is also a high priority. FDA is developing regulatory initiatives
to transform drug labeling into a readily understandable source of
information for individuals who are not health professionals, which
would help prevent the substantial waste and harm that occurs when
patients do not understand how to use therapeutic drugs properly. The
agency is completing implementation of the new food labeling at this
time in a pioneering effort to provide consumers with information that
enables them to use food products in a manner consistent with a healthy
life style.
Consistent with the Vice President's recommendation for a new food
safety program to reform regulatory oversight of the nation's food
supply, FDA is working to replace its current oversight strategy with a
cost-effective, state-of-the-art strategy. The agency's proposed new
approach for oversight of seafood is based on the system of Hazard
Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP), and FDA plans to work with
the food industry to explore expanding HACCP to other components of the
food supply.
FDA has embarked on a number of initiatives to improve and focus on
women's health. The agency is moving to implement the Mammography
Quality Standards Act rapidly to facilitate the detection of breast
cancer and is establishing an Office of Women's Health to provide
leadership and monitoring in areas such as the application of the
agency's revised clinical trial guidelines, the development of new
contraceptives and products to protect women against sexually
transmitted diseases, and the safety of cosmetics.
The United States leads the world in development of new technologies,
and FDA has given priority to products of important new technologies,
such as gene and somatic cell therapy and food plants genetically
altered through use of recombinant DNA techniques, striking a balance
between regulation and reliance on the private sector in a manner that
encourages the rapid evolution of these technologies, their continued
adaptation to health-related uses, and the building of public
confidence in them. To help speed important new drugs and medical
devices to patients, the agency has also developed new programs, such
as user fees for drug approvals. In order to facilitate the electronic
submission of marketing applications for such products, FDA plans to
propose steps by which legally binding electronic signatures may be
affixed to such applications, thus validating them. FDA will address
concerns about the integrity of clinical data submitted to support
marketing approval of new therapies by proposing the disclosure by
clinical investigators of potentially biasing financial holdings.
Finally, FDA has undertaken the review of a large number of regulations
for burdensome provisions that can and should be eliminated. As part of
this process, the agency will work to assure that these regulations are
effective, consistent, sensible, and understandable. Regulations that
will come under scrutiny include a major portion of the general
biologics regulations; the blood and blood products regulations; the
regulations governing the investigation and review of new animal drugs;
and the good manufacturing practice regulations for medical devices.
Social Security Administration (SSA)
The Social Security Administration continuously reviews its
regulations to ensure that its policies constitute a properly
integrated program that conforms to the statutes, court decisions,
public needs, and to the principles of economical, efficient, and
effective administration.
SSA has three major initiatives under way. On September 8, 1994,
Commissioner Chater issued an agency Disability Process Redesign Plan.
Decisions on implementation, including the need for regulations, are
not yet final.
SSA is continuing a cooperative project with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) and other government agencies to develop a simplified
wage reporting system. Under the proposed system, Federal and State
agencies would develop an integrated reporting approach whereby
employers would file employment and wage-related information with a
single processing entity. The processing entity would, in turn, be
responsible for providing the data to Federal, State, and local
agencies for which the submitted information was intended. This system
would eliminate redundant wage reports and greatly reduce the
complexity of wage and tax reporting requirements presently imposed
upon employers.
SSA is currently evaluating findings and recommendations made by the
MITRE Corporation to determine the next step toward implementation. The
MITRE Corporation's preliminary economic analysis suggests that
employers could save approximately $1 billion a year under the system's
full implementation. Findings to date indicate that an agreement would
be needed with each participating State to ensure that State needs are
adequately met and to reach agreement on necessary cost-sharing
arrangements.
In addition, SSA is continuing to work with the IRS to coordinate the
timing of when employers are required to file wage and tax reports.
Currently, employers are required to file Form 941 wage reports by the
end of January and Forms W-2/W-3 by the end of February. SSA is
Other Popular 1994 Unified Agenda Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |