Home > 1994 Unified Agenda > ua14no94 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL)...ua14no94 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL)...
<DOC>
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)
The Department of Justice is not a major regulatory agency, and carries
out its vital investigative, prosecutorial, and other law enforcement
activities principally through means other than the regulatory process.
Even so, the Department does have significant responsibilities for
implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act and other civil rights
laws through regulations as well as immigration laws, including the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the Immigration Act of
1990. The Department's key regulatory goals and initiatives are set
forth in detail below.
The Department has worked actively to implement the general regulatory
principles of Executive Order 12866. Relatively few of the Department's
rules are ``significant regulatory actions'' requiring review by the
Office of Management and Budget under the Executive Order. Accordingly,
the reorientation of the OMB review process to focus on significant
rules has required the Department to increase its own efforts to ensure
that all of its regulations are carefully reviewed for consistency with
the Administration's regulatory principles, including the large
majority of rules that are not reviewed directly by OMB as
``significant regulatory actions.''
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
Pursuant to Section 4(c) of Executive Order 12866, the Department of
Justice provides the following statement of regulatory priorities,
focusing in particular on eight regulatory initiatives in the three
areas of civil rights, immigration, and asset forfeiture.
In addition to the specific initiatives set forth below, several other
components of the Department carry out important responsibilities
through the regulatory process. Although their regulatory efforts are
not singled out for specific attention in this Regulatory Plan, those
components carry out key roles in implementing the Department's law
enforcement priorities. In particular, the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is responsible for controlling abuse of narcotics
and dangerous drugs by restricting the aggregate supply of those drugs.
DEA accomplishes its objectives through coordination with State, local,
and other Federal officials in drug enforcement activities; development
and maintenance of drug intelligence systems; regulation of legitimate
controlled substances; and enforcement coordination and intelligence-
gathering activities with foreign government agencies. DEA is presently
developing regulations to implement the provisions of the Domestic
Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993, which imposes registration
requirements upon manufacturers, distributors, importers and exporters
of List I chemicals (formerly known as precursor chemicals).
Civil Rights
The Department and its Civil Rights Division are deeply committed to a
rigorous and revitalized approach to the enforcement of this nation's
civil rights laws. In keeping with that commitment, the Division will
be reviewing, updating, and improving its civil rights regulations,
which are the Division's basic enforcement tools. As priorities for the
coming year, the Division will be focusing on regulations implementing
title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and title IX of the Education
Amendments Act of 1972, which are intended to serve as models for other
Federal agencies. The Division also is completing the initial ADA
rulemaking cycle by amending its regulations under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) to incorporate revised standards applicable to
new building and facilities used by State and local governments. The
Department's Regulatory Plan has four civil rights initiatives.
All agencies, with the Department's encouragement and support, need to
begin the process of updating their title VI regulations, which may now
be two decades old. The Department's goal will be the creation of a
model, state-of-the-art, title VI rule. This will actually involve two
closely related initiatives, one to be used within the Department for
programs and activities receiving financial assistance from the
Department, and the other for use throughout the Federal Government
pursuant to the Department's responsibility to promote coordination of
title VI enforcement by all agencies. The Department's model rule is
intended to include the most effective enforcement procedures from
current regulations and will also contain language to implement the
definition of ``program or activity'' added by the Civil Rights
Restoration Act of 1987 (CRRA), Public Law No. 100-259.
The Division will also be publishing a revised proposed regulation,
implementing title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which
forbids discrimination on the basis of sex in educational activities
receiving Federal financial assistance. The rule will incorporate
statutory amendments to title IX (made by the Civil Rights Restoration
Act of 1987) and controlling judicial precedents. The final title IX
regulation is intended to serve also as a model for other Federal
agencies to promote effective compliance.
The Department is also planning to make revisions in its regulations
implementing title II of the ADA (and conforming changes to title III)
in order to incorporate the revised accessibility design guidelines
developed by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (the Access Board). Subtitle A of title II of the ADA protects
qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the
basis of disability in the services, programs, or activities of all
State and local governments. Title III of the ADA protects qualified
individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of
disability by public accommodations and in commercial facilities. The
Access Board's new guidelines for State and local buildings and
facilities are the subject of a related, pending rulemaking proceeding,
and have been subject to considerable scrutiny through the Board's
regulatory process. The Department of Justice, which is required by
statute to promulgate regulations that do not go below the Access
Board's minimum guidelines, will incorporate them into the Department's
title II rule.
These amendments to the ADA regulations are an important step forward
in fulfilling the promise of the ADA in ushering in a new era of
opportunity and dignity for the many millions of Americans with
disabilities. These regulations, which will apply to new construction
and to alterations of State and local buildings and facilities, will
open doors that have shut out people with disabilities in the past.
Immigration
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) is responsible for
facilitating the entry of persons legally admissible as visitors or as
immigrants to the United States, for preventing unlawful entry or
receipt of immigration benefits by those who are not entitled to
receive them, and for apprehending or removing those aliens who enter
or remain illegally in the United States. Though many of the
Administration's goals for more effective immigration process require
either new statutory authority or increased resources, the regulatory
process is a vital aspect of carrying out the goals of the immigration
laws.
Certainly, one of the regulatory challenges facing the Department of
Justice is to improve the effectiveness of those regulatory efforts.
Commissioner Meissner established three fundamental goals at the time
of her confirmation: to increase the professionalization of the
Service, to provide immigration control with compassion, and to build
the Service's role in immigration policy leadership and communication.
The regulatory priorities for the Service follow those priorities,
though other desired improvements will require legislative action.
Three INS initiatives are included in this Regulatory Plan.
The principal policy and program delivery regulations which will be
presented this year address areas of vulnerability in the immigration
system. They are also structured to facilitate the proper use of the
system by deserving persons. The principal regulation will provide
much-needed reforms for the asylum system. After a thorough review of
the delivery of asylum determinations, the Department this spring
published proposed revisions to asylum regulations which will allow the
timely adjudication of cases while instituting safeguards against abuse
of the U.S. asylum system. The key priority is the adoption of these
asylum reforms in final form. Another regulation will reduce the number
of documents which are used to verify immigration status for purposes
of employment in order to facilitate employer's compliance with the
Act.
The Service has also proposed a number of enhancements to its
organizational structure for management of the functions it performs.
There is now an approved reorganization which will be implemented this
year. Regulations establishing that structure and delegations of
authority will be published.
Finally, the Service is presently implementing a number of changes to
its fee schedules for various applications. (This rule is not included
in the Regulatory Plan because it will be published in the very near
future.) The Service is in a continuous improvement program for the
delivery of those services it delivers to the public, and the fee
structure for those services. Regulations will be promulgated in the
future to increase the effectiveness of service delivery as we move to
further automation of business functions in both the benefit and
enforcement arenas. In particular, the Service will address service to
States and localities, information exchange and facilitation of
procedures for the public.
Asset Forfeiture
The Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture has one initiative listed in
this Regulatory Plan, to revise and consolidate the Department's
regulations on remission and mitigation of asset forfeiture. The rule
is one part of the Department's set of administrative and legislative
initiatives to improve the asset forfeiture program. Further, by
replacing numerous sets of agency-specific regulations, this action
will reduce the volume of petition regulations, enhance consistency in
the petitions process, and facilitate understanding and use of the
petitions process by the public.
_______________________________________________________________________
DOJ--Civil Rights Division (CRT)
___________________________________________________________
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
___________________________________________________________
87. NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED
PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES--IMPLEMENTATION OF TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION
AMENDMENTS OF 1972
Legal Authority:
20 USC 1682
CFR Citation:
28 CFR 42 subpart J (New)
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department's proposed regulation implements the requirements of
title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of an individual's sex in
federally assisted educational programs. On June 17, 1980, the
Department published a proposed title IX regulation that was never
issued in final form. As a result of interim legislation and judicial
opinions, it is necessary to revise our prior proposed regulation
before a final regulation can be issued.
Statement of Need:
There is an urgent need to issue this regulation. First, the Department
is obligated to issue a title IX regulation since it funds many
educational programs. Second, because the Department's regulation will
incorporate legislative amendments and controlling precedents to date,
it can be expected that other agencies will rely on it in revising
their own, outdated, regulations.
Alternatives:
Because title IX requires an agency (such as the Department of Justice)
that funds educational programs to issue implementing regulations,
issuance of a title IX regulation is mandatory. With respect to the
contents of the title IX regulation, the Department will consider all
comments received during the public comment period before issuing a
final regulation.
Anticipated Costs and Benefits:
In order to carry out this Administration's commitment to equal
educational opportunity for women, it is essential that the Department
of Justice issue its own regulation implementing title IX. The failure
of previous administrations to direct that this regulation be issued
means that the Department has no regulation in place to guide the
Department in granting financial assistance to educational programs or
in investigating complaints of sex discrimination in funded programs.
In providing Federal financial assistance to educational programs, the
Department has been subject to the requirements of title IX since it
was enacted in 1972. Therefore, promulgating this regulation should not
impose any new costs upon recipients of Federal financial assistance.
Risks:
Without a regulation that incorporates legislative amendments and
controlling judicial precedents in place, the Department risks
violating title IX. Furthermore, if this regulatory activity is not
undertaken, there are substantial risks: (1) that individuals who are
granted protection from discrimination on the basis of sex will find
that their rights are not protected to the extent intended by
legislative amendments and controlling judicial decisions, and (2) that
Federal program funds will be expended in a discriminatory manner.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action DFR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/94
NPRM Comment Period End 01/00/95
Small Entities Affected:
Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected:
State, Local
Additional Information:
AGENCY CONTACT CONT: TTD (202) 514-0383.
Agency Contact:
Merrily A. Friedlander
Acting Chief
Coordination and Review Section
Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
P.O. Box 66118
Washington, DC 20035-6118
202 307-2222
RIN: 1190-AA28
_______________________________________________________________________
DOJ--CRT
88. <bullet> AMENDMENT TO NONDISCRIMINATION IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED
PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES--IMPLEMENTATION OF TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS
ACT OF 1964
Legal Authority:
42 USC 2000d to 2000d-4
CFR Citation:
Other Popular 1994 Unified Agenda Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |