Home > 1994 Unified Agenda > ua14no94 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC)...ua14no94 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC)...
<DOC>
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC)
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
I. Regulatory Priorities
The Federal Trade Commission is an independent agency charged with
protecting consumers and businesses from unfair, deceptive, and
anticompetitive practices.
Although the agency pursues its mandate primarily through case-by-case
enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission Act and other statutes,
regulation is an important complement to this law enforcement effort,
particularly with respect to consumer protection matters. Commission
regulations generally are intended to ensure that consumers receive the
information necessary to evaluate competing products and make informed
purchasing decisions.
The Commission's regulatory efforts for 1994 will encompass
consideration of new regulations, modification of existing regulations,
and elimination of unneeded regulations. With respect to new
regulations, the Commission has been directed by Congress in the Energy
Policy Act of 1992 (EPA 92) to establish uniform labeling requirements,
if practicable, for alternative fuels (i.e., automotive fuels other
than gasoline and diesel, such as compressed natural gas, ethanol, and
electricity) and for vehicles that use alternative fuels. The statute
provides generally that the rule must require disclosure of
``appropriate'' cost and benefit information to enable consumers to
make reasonable purchasing choices and comparisons.
The Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on
December 10, 1993 (58 FR 64914), and a notice of proposed rulemaking on
May 9, 1994 (59 FR 24014). This proceeding is expected to generate
considerable interest because of the diverse industries affected by the
rule. In July 1994, the Commission convened a public forum with a
neutral facilitator to obtain additional public participation in the
rulemaking process and to gain the unique perspectives that interaction
among interested parties can provide. EPA 92 requires the Commission to
issue a final rule by May 9, 1995. EPA 92 also requires the Commission
to adopt a rule requiring lamp products to be labeled with the
information necessary to enable a consumer to select the most energy
efficient lamp that meets the consumer's requirements. The Commission
approved this rule on April 25, 1994. In this proceeding, the
Commission held a public forum to stimulate broader public interest and
involvement. A similar forum was held for the alternative fuels
rulemaking.
Also, the Commission recently has been directed by Congress in the
Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act to issue a
rule prohibiting deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts and
practices. The Act specifies that the rule contain a definition of what
constitutes deceptive telemarketing acts and practices, which may
include credit card laundering as well as other acts of assisting or
facilitating deceptive telemarketing. The purpose of the rulemaking is
to provide consumers with protection from telemarketing deception and
abuse. It is anticipated that the Commission will issue a notice of
proposed rulemaking in February 1995. The statute requires the final
rule to be promulgated within 365 days from the date of enactment.
With respect to rule modifications, the Commission plans to seek
comment later this year regarding possible amendments to its Care
Labeling Rule (16 CFR 423 (1994)). This rule requires manufacturers and
importers of textile wearing apparel to attach care labels to garments
(for example, dry clean only). The rule currently requires the
instructions to be in words, but allows symbols to be used in addition
to words. The FTC will seek comments respecting the desirability of
using symbols in lieu of words. Symbols could make care instructions
more understandable to non-English-speaking consumers, and thus not
only better serve a significant minority of American consumers, but
also enhance the prospects of export to and import from Mexico and
Canada, consistent with the goals of the North American Free Trade
Agreement. The Commission issued an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking on June 15, 1994 (59 FR 30733).
The FTC is also committed to eliminating unnecessary rules and
regulations. To this end, the Commission this year is seeking
information regarding the costs and benefits of 11 of its trade
practice rules and voluntary industry guides. (See 59 FR 2955, January
20, 1994.) This assessment is part of the Commission's ongoing program
to review all of its rules and guides every 10 years to determine
whether they should be retained, modified, or repealed. Since the
beginning of this fiscal year, the Commission has repealed three guides
and one rule as a result of this program. (See 59 FR 8527, February 23,
1994, announcing repeal of the Guides for the Greeting Card Industry
Relating to Discriminatory Practices, and repeal of the trade
regulation rule on Discriminatory Practices in Men's and Boy's Tailored
Clothing Industry, 16 CFR parts 244 and 412; and 58 FR 68292, December
27, 1993, announcing repeal of the Guides for Advertising Fallout
Shelters, and Guides on Radiation Monitoring Instruments, 16 CFR parts
229 and 232.)
With regard to both content and process, the FTC's ongoing and proposed
regulatory actions appear compatible with the President's priorities.
Substantively, the actions under consideration seek primarily to inform
and protect consumers and reduce the regulatory burdens on business.
The Commission's efforts this year under EPA 92 also serve to promote
environmental protection and conservation of energy resources.
Additionally, the Commission's ten-year program for reviewing its
existing regulations is in harmony with Section 5(a) of Executive Order
12866 (September 30, 1993; 58 FR 51735), which directs Executive branch
agencies to develop a plan to reevaluate periodically all of their
significant, existing regulations. Procedurally, the Commission also
continues to focus substantial attention on aspects of the regulatory
process that Executive Order 12866 seeks to promote: identifying and
weighing the costs and benefits of proposed actions and possible
alternative actions, and receiving the broadest practicable array of
comments from affected consumers, businesses, and the public at large.
In sum, therefore, the Federal Trade Commission's regulatory actions
are aimed at efficiently and fairly promoting the ability of ``private
markets to protect or improve the health and safety of the public, the
environment, or the well-being of the American people.'' Executive
Order 12866, Sec. I.
II. Regulatory Actions
The regulatory efforts described in this Plan are not ``significant
regulatory actions'' as that term is defined in Executive Order 12866.
The Commission nonetheless includes them because their effects will be
widespread and of substantial practical value to businesses and
consumers, and because they provide examples of the Commission's
anticipated regulatory activities for fiscal year 1995.
_______________________________________________________________________
FTC
___________________________________________________________
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
___________________________________________________________
207. THE CARE LABELING RULE
Legal Authority:
15 USC 41 et seq
CFR Citation:
16 CFR 423
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Care Labeling Rule requires manufacturers and importers of textile
wearing apparel to attach cleaning instructions stating what regular
care is needed for the ordinary use of the product. The Care Labeling
Rule currently requires that care instructions be stated in
``appropriate terms.'' The rule also states that ``any appropriate
symbols may be used on care labels or care instructions, in addition to
the required appropriate terms, so long as the terms fulfill the
requirements of the regulation.'' The rule does not specifically state
that the instructions must be set forth in English. The goal of the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is to establish a trade
zone in which goods can flow freely between Canada, Mexico, and the
United States. Both Canada and Mexico, however, require that garments
containing instructions in English also contain instructions in French
or Spanish, respectively. Thus, textile industry members are concerned
about the length of care labels that contain instructions in three
languages. Although manufacturers could separately label garments for
each of these three countries, this would increase the costs and reduce
the advantages of a large free trade zone. These manufacturers,
therefore, propose to use care symbols in lieu of care language.
Statement of Need:
In addition, environmentalists are interested in reducing the use of
dry cleaning solvents. There is some evidence indicating that some
solvents may be damaging to the environment. The Care Labeling Rule
currently only requires either a washing instruction or a dry cleaning
instruction; it does not require both. Thus, some garments that are
labeled ``dry clean'' may also be washable, and if the rule required
both washing and dry cleaning instructions for these garments, some
members of the public might use dry cleaning solvents less frequently.
The Commission does not know at present the incidence with which
garments that can be both dry cleaned and washed are labeled only with
dry cleaning instructions. The Commission has solicited comment on
whether it would be desirable to allow the use of symbols in lieu of
language on care labels; on whether, and under what circumstances, it
is desirable to require washing instructions as well as dry cleaning
instructions; and in general, on the costs, benefits, and regulatory
and economic impact of an amended Care Labeling Rule.
Summary of the Legal Basis:
No aspect of this action is required by statute or court order. The
Commission has solicited comment on these issues as part of its ongoing
program to review periodically all its rules and guides. Any amendment
of the Care Labeling Rule will be undertaken pursuant to the general
authority granted to the Commission by the Federal Trade Commission
Act, 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. If the Commission decides to amend the rule,
the Commission will determine whether that action must be undertaken
according to the extensive rulemaking procedures mandated by section 18
of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 57a, or whether other procedural approaches
are available and appropriate.
Alternatives:
In considering whether the rule should be modified to permit the use of
symbols in lieu of language, the Commission will consider all existing
systems of symbols for care labeling and will seek comment on the
benefits and burdens associated with each system. In considering
whether the rule should be modified to require a washing instruction in
addition to a dry cleaning instruction, the Commission will solicit
information as to the extent of the impact of the care label on the
incidence of dry cleaning, and the costs and benefits to consumers of
washing rather than dry cleaning certain fabrics. The Commission will
also consider any comments relevant to the rule suggesting alternative
ways of reducing the environmental damage that has been associated with
PCE.
Anticipated Costs and Benefits:
In the notice requesting comment, the Commission requested information
about the costs and benefits of the possible changes to the rule.
Risks:
Perchloroethylene (PCE), the most commonly used dry cleaning solvent,
has been designated as a hazardous air pollutant under Section 112 of
the Clean Air Act and under many State air toxics regulations. On
September 15, 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set
national emission standards for new and existing PCE dry cleaning
facilities. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics has been
working with the dry cleaning industry to reduce human exposure to PCE.
EPA and the dry cleaning industry are also collaborating on a Cleaner
Technologies Substitute Assessment (CTSA) for the industry, and as a
part of this collaboration, EPA has published a summary of a cleaning
process known as Multiprocess Wet Cleaning. This process relies on the
application of heat, steam and natural soaps to clean clothes that are
typically dry cleaned. If the Commission finds that a significant
number of washable garments are labeled only with a ``dry clean''
instruction, changing the rule to require that care instructions state
whether the garment can also be washed might reduce risks to public
health, safety, and the environment, by encouraging dry cleaners to use
multiprocess wet cleaning, and where appropriate, by encouraging
consumers to wash, rather than dry clean, certain garments.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action DFR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
Publication of A59 FR 30733 06/15/94
Comment Period Closes 10/15/94
Commission Determination 01/00/95
Small Entities Affected:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Constance Vecellio
Care Labeling Rule Coordinator
Division of Enforcement
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, DC 20580
202 326-2966
RIN: 3084-AA54
_______________________________________________________________________
FTC
208. LABELING REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND ALTERNATIVE-FUELED
VEHICLES
Legal Authority:
42 USC 13232(a)
CFR Citation:
16 CFR 309
Legal Deadline:
NPRM, Statutory, April 25, 1994. Final, Statutory, May 9, 1995.
Abstract:
Section 406(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (``EPA 92''), Public
Law 102-486, 106 Stat. 2776 (1992), directs the Commission to issue a
rule establishing uniform labeling requirements for alternative fuels
and alternative-fueled vehicles. The Act does not specify what
Other Popular 1994 Unified Agenda Documents:
|
| GovRecords.org presents information on various agencies of the United States Government. Even though all information is believed to be credible and accurate, no guarantees are made on the complete accuracy of our government records archive. Care should be taken to verify the information presented by responsible parties. Please see our reference page for congressional, presidential, and judicial branch contact information. GovRecords.org values visitor privacy. Please see the privacy page for more information. |

![]() |